Assessment of Immigrant Students’ Listening Comprehension in Their First Languages (L1) Russian and Turkish in Grade 9 : Test Construction and Validation

dc.contributor.authorEdele, Aileen
dc.contributor.authorSchotte, Kristin
dc.contributor.authorStanat, Petra
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-26T09:41:17Z
dc.date.available2019-06-26T09:41:17Z
dc.date.issued2016-04-02eng
dc.description.abstractIn large-scale studies, immigrant students’ first-language (L1) proficiency is typically measured with subjective instruments, such as self-reports, rather than with objective tests. The National Educational Panel Study (NEPS) addresses this methodological limitation by testing the L1 proficiency of the two largest immigrant groups in Germany, namely students whose families have immigrated to Germany from the area of the Former Soviet Union or Turkey. Listening comprehension tests in Russian and Turkish were developed for this purpose. The current paper describes the general framework and requirements for testing first-language proficiency within the NEPS and describes the construction of the L1 tests for 9th-Grade students. Subsequently, the paper reports on analyses of measurement equivalence indicating that the Russian and Turkish tests assess the same construct (configural equivalence). The ability scores and their correlations with other variables are, however, not directly comparable. Analyses of construct validity confirm the unidimensional structure expected for the test. In addition, the L1 test scores correlate with other indicators of L1 proficiency as well as with factors regarded as crucial for L1 acquisition, such as exposure to L1, in the expected way (convergent validity), and they are not substantially related to measures of general cognitive abilities (discriminant validity). We conclude that the listening comprehension tests developed in the NEPS are valid measures of L1 proficiency.eng
dc.description.versionpublishedeng
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/978-3-658-11994-2_25eng
dc.identifier.urihttps://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/46125
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.subjectItem Difficulty, Immigrant Student, Immigrant Generation, General Cognitive Ability, Narrative Texteng
dc.subject.ddc300eng
dc.titleAssessment of Immigrant Students’ Listening Comprehension in Their First Languages (L1) Russian and Turkish in Grade 9 : Test Construction and Validationeng
dc.typeINCOLLECTIONeng
dspace.entity.typePublication
kops.citation.bibtex
@incollection{Edele2016-04-02Asses-46125,
  year={2016},
  doi={10.1007/978-3-658-11994-2_25},
  title={Assessment of Immigrant Students’ Listening Comprehension in Their First Languages (L1) Russian and Turkish in Grade 9 : Test Construction and Validation},
  isbn={978-3-658-11992-8},
  publisher={Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden},
  address={Wiesbaden, Germany},
  booktitle={Methodological Issues of Longitudinal Surveys : The Example of the National Educational Panel Study},
  pages={441--463},
  editor={Blossfeld, Hans-Peter and von Maurice, Jutta and Bayer, Michael and Skopek, Jan},
  author={Edele, Aileen and Schotte, Kristin and Stanat, Petra}
}
kops.citation.iso690EDELE, Aileen, Kristin SCHOTTE, Petra STANAT, 2016. Assessment of Immigrant Students’ Listening Comprehension in Their First Languages (L1) Russian and Turkish in Grade 9 : Test Construction and Validation. In: BLOSSFELD, Hans-Peter, ed., Jutta VON MAURICE, ed., Michael BAYER, ed., Jan SKOPEK, ed.. Methodological Issues of Longitudinal Surveys : The Example of the National Educational Panel Study. Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, 2016, pp. 441-463. ISBN 978-3-658-11992-8. Available under: doi: 10.1007/978-3-658-11994-2_25deu
kops.citation.iso690EDELE, Aileen, Kristin SCHOTTE, Petra STANAT, 2016. Assessment of Immigrant Students’ Listening Comprehension in Their First Languages (L1) Russian and Turkish in Grade 9 : Test Construction and Validation. In: BLOSSFELD, Hans-Peter, ed., Jutta VON MAURICE, ed., Michael BAYER, ed., Jan SKOPEK, ed.. Methodological Issues of Longitudinal Surveys : The Example of the National Educational Panel Study. Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, 2016, pp. 441-463. ISBN 978-3-658-11992-8. Available under: doi: 10.1007/978-3-658-11994-2_25eng
kops.citation.rdf
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/46125">
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2019-06-26T09:41:17Z</dc:date>
    <dc:contributor>Edele, Aileen</dc:contributor>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">In large-scale studies, immigrant students’ first-language (L1) proficiency is typically measured with subjective instruments, such as self-reports, rather than with objective tests. The National Educational Panel Study (NEPS) addresses this methodological limitation by testing the L1 proficiency of the two largest immigrant groups in Germany, namely students whose families have immigrated to Germany from the area of the Former Soviet Union or Turkey. Listening comprehension tests in Russian and Turkish were developed for this purpose. The current paper describes the general framework and requirements for testing first-language proficiency within the NEPS and describes the construction of the L1 tests for 9th-Grade students. Subsequently, the paper reports on analyses of measurement equivalence indicating that the Russian and Turkish tests assess the same construct (configural equivalence). The ability scores and their correlations with other variables are, however, not directly comparable. Analyses of construct validity confirm the unidimensional structure expected for the test. In addition, the L1 test scores correlate with other indicators of L1 proficiency as well as with factors regarded as crucial for L1 acquisition, such as exposure to L1, in the expected way (convergent validity), and they are not substantially related to measures of general cognitive abilities (discriminant validity). We conclude that the listening comprehension tests developed in the NEPS are valid measures of L1 proficiency.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dc:contributor>Schotte, Kristin</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Stanat, Petra</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/31"/>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dcterms:issued>2016-04-02</dcterms:issued>
    <dc:creator>Stanat, Petra</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:title>Assessment of Immigrant Students’ Listening Comprehension in Their First Languages (L1) Russian and Turkish in Grade 9 : Test Construction and Validation</dcterms:title>
    <dc:creator>Edele, Aileen</dc:creator>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/46125"/>
    <dc:creator>Schotte, Kristin</dc:creator>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/31"/>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2019-06-26T09:41:17Z</dcterms:available>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
kops.flag.knbibliographyfalse
kops.sourcefieldBLOSSFELD, Hans-Peter, ed., Jutta VON MAURICE, ed., Michael BAYER, ed., Jan SKOPEK, ed.. <i>Methodological Issues of Longitudinal Surveys : The Example of the National Educational Panel Study</i>. Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, 2016, pp. 441-463. ISBN 978-3-658-11992-8. Available under: doi: 10.1007/978-3-658-11994-2_25deu
kops.sourcefield.plainBLOSSFELD, Hans-Peter, ed., Jutta VON MAURICE, ed., Michael BAYER, ed., Jan SKOPEK, ed.. Methodological Issues of Longitudinal Surveys : The Example of the National Educational Panel Study. Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, 2016, pp. 441-463. ISBN 978-3-658-11992-8. Available under: doi: 10.1007/978-3-658-11994-2_25deu
kops.sourcefield.plainBLOSSFELD, Hans-Peter, ed., Jutta VON MAURICE, ed., Michael BAYER, ed., Jan SKOPEK, ed.. Methodological Issues of Longitudinal Surveys : The Example of the National Educational Panel Study. Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, 2016, pp. 441-463. ISBN 978-3-658-11992-8. Available under: doi: 10.1007/978-3-658-11994-2_25eng
relation.isAuthorOfPublication3714c886-7ae8-4fbd-8bd8-469daa514270
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery3714c886-7ae8-4fbd-8bd8-469daa514270
source.bibliographicInfo.fromPage441eng
source.bibliographicInfo.toPage463eng
source.contributor.editorBlossfeld, Hans-Peter
source.contributor.editorvon Maurice, Jutta
source.contributor.editorBayer, Michael
source.contributor.editorSkopek, Jan
source.identifier.isbn978-3-658-11992-8eng
source.publisherSpringer Fachmedien Wiesbadeneng
source.publisher.locationWiesbaden, Germanyeng
source.titleMethodological Issues of Longitudinal Surveys : The Example of the National Educational Panel Studyeng

Dateien