Datensatz:

Data from: Bat species comparisons based on external morphology: a test of traditional versus geometric morphometric approaches

Lade...
Vorschaubild

Datum der Erstveröffentlichung

2016

Autor:innen

Benítez, Hugo A.
Borissov, Ivailo M.

Andere Beitragende

Repositorium der Erstveröffentlichung

DRYAD

Version des Datensatzes

Angaben zur Forschungsförderung

Projekt

Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Bewerten Sie die FAIRness der Forschungsdaten
Fuji Logo

Gesperrt bis

Titel in einer weiteren Sprache

Publikationsstatus
Published

Zusammenfassung

External morphology is commonly used to identify bats as well as to investigate flight and foraging behavior, typically relying on simple length and area measures or ratios. However, geometric morphometrics is increasingly used in the biological sciences to analyse variation in shape and discriminate among species and populations. Here we compare the ability of traditional versus geometric morphometric methods in discriminating between closely related bat species – in this case European horseshoe bats (Rhinolophidae, Chiroptera) – based on morphology of the wing, body and tail. In addition to comparing morphometric methods, we used geometric morphometrics to detect interspecies differences as shape changes. Geometric morphometrics yielded improved species discrimination relative to traditional methods. The predicted shape for the variation along the between group principal components revealed that the largest differences between species lay in the extent to which the wing reaches in the direction of the head. This strong trend in interspecific shape variation is associated with size, which we interpret as an evolutionary allometry pattern.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache

Fachgebiet (DDC)
570 Biowissenschaften, Biologie

Schlagwörter

centroid size, evolutionary allometry, Geometric morphometric, length measures, ratios, residuals, Rhinolophidae, Rhinolophus blasii, Rhinolophus euryale, Rhinolophus ferrumequinum, Rhinolophus hipposideros, Rhinolophus mehelyi, traditional morphometric

Zugehörige Publikationen in KOPS

Item type: Publikation , Zeitschriftenartikel
Bat Species Comparisons Based on External Morphology : A Test of Traditional versus Geometric Morphometric Approaches
(2015) Schmieder, Daniela A.; Benîtez, Hugo A.; Borissov, Ivailo M.; Fruciano, Carmelo
Erschienen in: PLoS ONE. 2015, 10(5), e0127043. eISSN 1932-6203. Verfügbar unter: doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127043
Link zu zugehöriger Publikation
Link zu zugehörigem Datensatz

Zitieren

ISO 690SCHMIEDER, Daniela A., Hugo A. BENÍTEZ, Ivailo M. BORISSOV, Carmelo FRUCIANO, 2016. Data from: Bat species comparisons based on external morphology: a test of traditional versus geometric morphometric approaches
BibTex
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/76776">
    <dcterms:title>Data from: Bat species comparisons based on external morphology: a test of traditional versus geometric morphometric approaches</dcterms:title>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dcterms:abstract>External morphology is commonly used to identify bats as well as to investigate flight and foraging behavior, typically relying on simple length and area measures or ratios. However, geometric morphometrics is increasingly used in the biological sciences to analyse variation in shape and discriminate among species and populations. Here we compare the ability of traditional versus geometric morphometric methods in discriminating between closely related bat species – in this case European horseshoe bats (Rhinolophidae, Chiroptera) – based on morphology of the wing, body and tail. In addition to comparing morphometric methods, we used geometric morphometrics to detect interspecies differences as shape changes. Geometric morphometrics yielded improved species discrimination relative to traditional methods. The predicted shape for the variation along the between group principal components revealed that the largest differences between species lay in the extent to which the wing reaches in the direction of the head. This strong trend in interspecific shape variation is associated with size, which we interpret as an evolutionary allometry pattern.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dc:contributor>Fruciano, Carmelo</dc:contributor>
    <dc:rights>Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal</dc:rights>
    <dc:creator>Fruciano, Carmelo</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Benítez, Hugo A.</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Borissov, Ivailo M.</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:created rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2015-05-05T18:00:31Z</dcterms:created>
    <dcterms:issued>2016</dcterms:issued>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2026-03-27T13:11:21Z</dc:date>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/71914"/>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/71914"/>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/76776"/>
    <dc:creator>Schmieder, Daniela A.</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Borissov, Ivailo M.</dc:creator>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dc:creator>Benítez, Hugo A.</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/legalcode"/>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2026-03-27T13:11:21Z</dcterms:available>
    <dc:contributor>Schmieder, Daniela A.</dc:contributor>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
URL (Link zu den Daten)

Prüfdatum der URL

Kommentar zur Publikation

Universitätsbibliographie
Nein
Diese Publikation teilen
social media icon
social media icon