Publikation: Bat Species Comparisons Based on External Morphology : A Test of Traditional versus Geometric Morphometric Approaches
Dateien
Datum
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
URI (zitierfähiger Link)
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Link zur Lizenz
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Publikationsstatus
Erschienen in
Zusammenfassung
External morphology is commonly used to identify bats as well as to investigate flight and foraging behavior, typically relying on simple length and area measures or ratios. However, geometric morphometrics is increasingly used in the biological sciences to analyse variation in shape and discriminate among species and populations. Here we compare the ability of traditional versus geometric morphometric methods in discriminating between closely related bat species – in this case European horseshoe bats (Rhinolophidae, Chiroptera) – based on morphology of the wing, body and tail. In addition to comparing morphometric methods, we used geometric morphometrics to detect interspecies differences as shape changes. Geometric morphometrics yielded improved species discrimination relative to traditional methods. The predicted shape for the variation along the between group principal components revealed that the largest differences between species lay in the extent to which the wing reaches in the direction of the head. This strong trend in interspecific shape variation is associated with size, which we interpret as an evolutionary allometry pattern.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
Zitieren
ISO 690
SCHMIEDER, Daniela A., Hugo A. BENÎTEZ, Ivailo M. BORISSOV, Carmelo FRUCIANO, 2015. Bat Species Comparisons Based on External Morphology : A Test of Traditional versus Geometric Morphometric Approaches. In: PLoS ONE. 2015, 10(5), e0127043. eISSN 1932-6203. Available under: doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127043BibTex
@article{Schmieder2015Speci-31231, year={2015}, doi={10.1371/journal.pone.0127043}, title={Bat Species Comparisons Based on External Morphology : A Test of Traditional versus Geometric Morphometric Approaches}, number={5}, volume={10}, journal={PLoS ONE}, author={Schmieder, Daniela A. and Benîtez, Hugo A. and Borissov, Ivailo M. and Fruciano, Carmelo}, note={Article Number: e0127043} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/31231"> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2015-06-22T09:33:13Z</dc:date> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <dc:creator>Fruciano, Carmelo</dc:creator> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/31231"/> <dcterms:title>Bat Species Comparisons Based on External Morphology : A Test of Traditional versus Geometric Morphometric Approaches</dcterms:title> <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/31231/3/Schmieder_0-293912.pdf"/> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dc:rights>Attribution 4.0 International</dc:rights> <dc:contributor>Borissov, Ivailo M.</dc:contributor> <dc:contributor>Fruciano, Carmelo</dc:contributor> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"/> <dc:contributor>Schmieder, Daniela A.</dc:contributor> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2015-06-22T09:33:13Z</dcterms:available> <dc:creator>Borissov, Ivailo M.</dc:creator> <dcterms:issued>2015</dcterms:issued> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/28"/> <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/31231/3/Schmieder_0-293912.pdf"/> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">External morphology is commonly used to identify bats as well as to investigate flight and foraging behavior, typically relying on simple length and area measures or ratios. However, geometric morphometrics is increasingly used in the biological sciences to analyse variation in shape and discriminate among species and populations. Here we compare the ability of traditional versus geometric morphometric methods in discriminating between closely related bat species – in this case European horseshoe bats (Rhinolophidae, Chiroptera) – based on morphology of the wing, body and tail. In addition to comparing morphometric methods, we used geometric morphometrics to detect interspecies differences as shape changes. Geometric morphometrics yielded improved species discrimination relative to traditional methods. The predicted shape for the variation along the between group principal components revealed that the largest differences between species lay in the extent to which the wing reaches in the direction of the head. This strong trend in interspecific shape variation is associated with size, which we interpret as an evolutionary allometry pattern.</dcterms:abstract> <dc:contributor>Benîtez, Hugo A.</dc:contributor> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/28"/> <dc:creator>Benîtez, Hugo A.</dc:creator> <dc:creator>Schmieder, Daniela A.</dc:creator> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>