Public opinion on policy and budgetary trade-offs in European welfare states : evidence from a new comparative survey
Dateien
Datum
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
URI (zitierfähiger Link)
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Link zur Lizenz
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Publikationsstatus
Erschienen in
Zusammenfassung
In the wake of the ‘Great Recession’, welfare states have entered a new phase of austerity. Simultaneously, new social risks and the rise of the knowledge economy fuel new demands on the welfare state. We analyse how demands for social investment policies – particularly education – come into conflict with budgetary concerns, using new survey data on individual-level preferences in eight European countries. Paying particular attention to fiscal and budgetary trade-offs, we find that social investments are generally very popular, but as soon as realistic budget constraints are added, public support drops considerably. The largest drop occurs when social investments would be financed with cutbacks in social transfers rather than higher taxes or higher public debt levels. Furthermore, when studying the determinants of preferences, we find that in the era of permanent austerity distributive conflicts within welfare states exhibit a different political dynamic than conflicts about the size of the welfare state.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
Zitieren
ISO 690
BUSEMEYER, Marius R., Julian L. GARRITZMANN, 2017. Public opinion on policy and budgetary trade-offs in European welfare states : evidence from a new comparative survey. In: Journal of European Public Policy. 2017, 24(6), pp. 871-889. ISSN 0143-814X. eISSN 1469-7815. Available under: doi: 10.1080/13501763.2017.1298658BibTex
@article{Busemeyer2017Publi-38608.2, year={2017}, doi={10.1080/13501763.2017.1298658}, title={Public opinion on policy and budgetary trade-offs in European welfare states : evidence from a new comparative survey}, number={6}, volume={24}, issn={0143-814X}, journal={Journal of European Public Policy}, pages={871--889}, author={Busemeyer, Marius R. and Garritzmann, Julian L.} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/38608.2"> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">In the wake of the ‘Great Recession’, welfare states have entered a new phase of austerity. Simultaneously, new social risks and the rise of the knowledge economy fuel new demands on the welfare state. We analyse how demands for social investment policies – particularly education – come into conflict with budgetary concerns, using new survey data on individual-level preferences in eight European countries. Paying particular attention to fiscal and budgetary trade-offs, we find that social investments are generally very popular, but as soon as realistic budget constraints are added, public support drops considerably. The largest drop occurs when social investments would be financed with cutbacks in social transfers rather than higher taxes or higher public debt levels. Furthermore, when studying the determinants of preferences, we find that in the era of permanent austerity distributive conflicts within welfare states exhibit a different political dynamic than conflicts about the size of the welfare state.</dcterms:abstract> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <dc:creator>Busemeyer, Marius R.</dc:creator> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/38608.2/1/Busemeyer_2-1vvtaxto1apnu1.pdf"/> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2018-04-09T13:30:59Z</dcterms:available> <dc:creator>Garritzmann, Julian L.</dc:creator> <dcterms:title>Public opinion on policy and budgetary trade-offs in European welfare states : evidence from a new comparative survey</dcterms:title> <dc:contributor>Busemeyer, Marius R.</dc:contributor> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2018-04-09T13:30:59Z</dc:date> <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/38608.2/1/Busemeyer_2-1vvtaxto1apnu1.pdf"/> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/38608.2"/> <dcterms:issued>2017</dcterms:issued> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/> <dc:contributor>Garritzmann, Julian L.</dc:contributor> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>