Hindsight Bias in Forensic Mental Health Novices and Experts : An Exploratory Study

dc.contributor.authorWeber, Michael A.
dc.contributor.authorAlbrecht, Joëlle N.
dc.contributor.authorEndrass, Jérôme
dc.contributor.authorHumbel, Delia
dc.contributor.authorMeier, Dominique R.
dc.contributor.authorSingh, Jay P.
dc.contributor.authorGerth, Juliane
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-11T06:15:22Z
dc.date.available2024-09-11T06:15:22Z
dc.date.issued2025-10-20
dc.description.abstractDecision-making processes are vulnerable to cognitive biases like hindsight bias, with particularly fateful consequences in forensic contexts. However, while debiasing strategies have been effective in various areas, their impact in forensics is underexplored. We investigated hindsight bias and a simple awareness-based debiasing strategy in novices (n = 52) and forensic professionals (n = 49). Participants were assigned to baseline, biased, or debiased conditions and rated an offender’s risk of re-offending using case vignettes. Significant hindsight bias was found in novices, but not experts who were also more aware of biases. Debiasing proved effective in novices, indicating that raising awareness may enhance equitable forensic decision-making.
dc.description.versionpublisheddeu
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/24732850.2024.2396991
dc.identifier.ppn1937508986
dc.identifier.urihttps://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/70761
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectCognitive bias
dc.subjectdebiasing
dc.subjectrisk assessment
dc.subjectexpertise
dc.subjectrecidivism
dc.subject.ddc150
dc.titleHindsight Bias in Forensic Mental Health Novices and Experts : An Exploratory Studyeng
dc.typeJOURNAL_ARTICLE
dspace.entity.typePublication
kops.citation.bibtex
@article{Weber2025-10-20Hinds-70761,
  title={Hindsight Bias in Forensic Mental Health Novices and Experts : An Exploratory Study},
  year={2025},
  doi={10.1080/24732850.2024.2396991},
  number={5},
  volume={25},
  issn={2473-2850},
  journal={Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice},
  pages={913--929},
  author={Weber, Michael A. and Albrecht, Joëlle N. and Endrass, Jérôme and Humbel, Delia and Meier, Dominique R. and Singh, Jay P. and Gerth, Juliane}
}
kops.citation.iso690WEBER, Michael A., Joëlle N. ALBRECHT, Jérôme ENDRASS, Delia HUMBEL, Dominique R. MEIER, Jay P. SINGH, Juliane GERTH, 2025. Hindsight Bias in Forensic Mental Health Novices and Experts : An Exploratory Study. In: Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice. Taylor & Francis. 2025, 25(5), S. 913-929. ISSN 2473-2850. eISSN 2473-2842. Verfügbar unter: doi: 10.1080/24732850.2024.2396991deu
kops.citation.iso690WEBER, Michael A., Joëlle N. ALBRECHT, Jérôme ENDRASS, Delia HUMBEL, Dominique R. MEIER, Jay P. SINGH, Juliane GERTH, 2025. Hindsight Bias in Forensic Mental Health Novices and Experts : An Exploratory Study. In: Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice. Taylor & Francis. 2025, 25(5), pp. 913-929. ISSN 2473-2850. eISSN 2473-2842. Available under: doi: 10.1080/24732850.2024.2396991eng
kops.citation.rdf
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/70761">
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/70761"/>
    <dcterms:title>Hindsight Bias in Forensic Mental Health Novices and Experts : An Exploratory Study</dcterms:title>
    <dc:creator>Meier, Dominique R.</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Albrecht, Joëlle N.</dc:contributor>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2024-09-11T06:15:22Z</dc:date>
    <dc:creator>Weber, Michael A.</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Singh, Jay P.</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Meier, Dominique R.</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:issued>2025-10-20</dcterms:issued>
    <dc:creator>Endrass, Jérôme</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2024-09-11T06:15:22Z</dcterms:available>
    <dc:contributor>Gerth, Juliane</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
    <dc:contributor>Endrass, Jérôme</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Singh, Jay P.</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/70761/1/Weber_2-48zs2bjusspy7.pdf"/>
    <dc:rights>Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International</dc:rights>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dc:creator>Albrecht, Joëlle N.</dc:creator>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dc:creator>Humbel, Delia</dc:creator>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/70761/1/Weber_2-48zs2bjusspy7.pdf"/>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
    <dc:contributor>Humbel, Delia</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Weber, Michael A.</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:abstract>Decision-making processes are vulnerable to cognitive biases like hindsight bias, with particularly fateful consequences in forensic contexts. However, while debiasing strategies have been effective in various areas, their impact in forensics is underexplored. We investigated hindsight bias and a simple awareness-based debiasing strategy in novices (n = 52) and forensic professionals (n = 49). Participants were assigned to baseline, biased, or debiased conditions and rated an offender’s risk of re-offending using case vignettes. Significant hindsight bias was found in novices, but not experts who were also more aware of biases. Debiasing proved effective in novices, indicating that raising awareness may enhance equitable forensic decision-making.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dc:creator>Gerth, Juliane</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/"/>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
kops.description.openAccessopenaccesshybrid
kops.flag.isPeerReviewedunknown
kops.flag.knbibliographytrue
kops.identifier.nbnurn:nbn:de:bsz:352-2-48zs2bjusspy7
kops.sourcefieldJournal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice. Taylor & Francis. 2025, <b>25</b>(5), S. 913-929. ISSN 2473-2850. eISSN 2473-2842. Verfügbar unter: doi: 10.1080/24732850.2024.2396991deu
kops.sourcefield.plainJournal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice. Taylor & Francis. 2025, 25(5), S. 913-929. ISSN 2473-2850. eISSN 2473-2842. Verfügbar unter: doi: 10.1080/24732850.2024.2396991deu
kops.sourcefield.plainJournal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice. Taylor & Francis. 2025, 25(5), pp. 913-929. ISSN 2473-2850. eISSN 2473-2842. Available under: doi: 10.1080/24732850.2024.2396991eng
relation.isAuthorOfPublicatione3f83abc-53cd-4eb4-aad1-cb18de59ee27
relation.isAuthorOfPublication1b64684c-b06b-49be-8e2c-40eb9598ba0f
relation.isAuthorOfPublication422bdf5f-3446-4c00-beaf-ab81726c7ee1
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoverye3f83abc-53cd-4eb4-aad1-cb18de59ee27
source.bibliographicInfo.fromPage913
source.bibliographicInfo.issue5
source.bibliographicInfo.toPage929
source.bibliographicInfo.volume25
source.identifier.eissn2473-2842
source.identifier.issn2473-2850
source.periodicalTitleJournal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice
source.publisherTaylor & Francis

Dateien

Originalbündel

Gerade angezeigt 1 - 1 von 1
Vorschaubild nicht verfügbar
Name:
Weber_2-48zs2bjusspy7.pdf
Größe:
674.37 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Weber_2-48zs2bjusspy7.pdf
Weber_2-48zs2bjusspy7.pdfGröße: 674.37 KBDownloads: 114