Robust evidence for bats as reservoir hosts is lacking in most African virus studies : a review and call to optimize sampling and conserve bats

dc.contributor.authorWeber, Natalie
dc.contributor.authorNagy, Martina
dc.contributor.authorMarkotter, Wanda
dc.contributor.authorSchaer, Juliane
dc.contributor.authorPuechmaille, Sébastien J.
dc.contributor.authorSutton, Jack
dc.contributor.authorDávalos, Liliana M.
dc.contributor.authorO'Mara, M. Teague
dc.contributor.authorWikelski, Martin
dc.contributor.authorDechmann, Dina K. N.
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-20T08:33:34Z
dc.date.available2023-11-20T08:33:34Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.description.abstractAfrica experiences frequent emerging disease outbreaks among humans, with bats often proposed as zoonotic pathogen hosts. We comprehensively reviewed virus–bat findings from papers published between 1978 and 2020 to evaluate the evidence that African bats are reservoir and/or bridging hosts for viruses that cause human disease. We present data from 162 papers (of 1322) with original findings on (1) numbers and species of bats sampled across bat families and the continent, (2) how bats were selected for study inclusion, (3) if bats were terminally sampled, (4) what types of ecological data, if any, were recorded and (5) which viruses were detected and with what methodology. We propose a scheme for evaluating presumed virus–host relationships by evidence type and quality, using the contrasting available evidence for Orthoebolavirus versus Orthomarburgvirus as an example. We review the wording in abstracts and discussions of all 162 papers, identifying key framing terms, how these refer to findings, and how they might contribute to people's beliefs about bats. We discuss the impact of scientific research communication on public perception and emphasize the need for strategies that minimize human–bat conflict and support bat conservation. Finally, we make recommendations for best practices that will improve virological study metadata.
dc.description.versionpublisheddeu
dc.identifier.doi10.1098/rsbl.2023.0358
dc.identifier.ppn1871583217
dc.identifier.urihttps://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/68275
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectAfrican Chiroptera
dc.subjectvirus–host relationship
dc.subjectvirological metadata
dc.subjectframing
dc.subjectOne Health
dc.subject.ddc570
dc.titleRobust evidence for bats as reservoir hosts is lacking in most African virus studies : a review and call to optimize sampling and conserve batseng
dc.typeJOURNAL_ARTICLE
dspace.entity.typePublication
kops.citation.bibtex
@article{Weber2023Robus-68275,
  year={2023},
  doi={10.1098/rsbl.2023.0358},
  title={Robust evidence for bats as reservoir hosts is lacking in most African virus studies : a review and call to optimize sampling and conserve bats},
  number={11},
  volume={19},
  issn={1744-9561},
  journal={Biology Letters},
  author={Weber, Natalie and Nagy, Martina and Markotter, Wanda and Schaer, Juliane and Puechmaille, Sébastien J. and Sutton, Jack and Dávalos, Liliana M. and O'Mara, Michael Teague and Wikelski, Martin and Dechmann, Dina K. N.},
  note={Article Number: 20230358}
}
kops.citation.iso690WEBER, Natalie, Martina NAGY, Wanda MARKOTTER, Juliane SCHAER, Sébastien J. PUECHMAILLE, Jack SUTTON, Liliana M. DÁVALOS, Michael Teague O'MARA, Martin WIKELSKI, Dina K. N. DECHMANN, 2023. Robust evidence for bats as reservoir hosts is lacking in most African virus studies : a review and call to optimize sampling and conserve bats. In: Biology Letters. Royal Society of London. 2023, 19(11), 20230358. ISSN 1744-9561. eISSN 1744-957X. Available under: doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2023.0358deu
kops.citation.iso690WEBER, Natalie, Martina NAGY, Wanda MARKOTTER, Juliane SCHAER, Sébastien J. PUECHMAILLE, Jack SUTTON, Liliana M. DÁVALOS, Michael Teague O'MARA, Martin WIKELSKI, Dina K. N. DECHMANN, 2023. Robust evidence for bats as reservoir hosts is lacking in most African virus studies : a review and call to optimize sampling and conserve bats. In: Biology Letters. Royal Society of London. 2023, 19(11), 20230358. ISSN 1744-9561. eISSN 1744-957X. Available under: doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2023.0358eng
kops.citation.rdf
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/68275">
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dc:contributor>Nagy, Martina</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Puechmaille, Sébastien J.</dc:contributor>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/68275/1/Weber_2-kv1tzlp5g5191.pdf"/>
    <dc:contributor>Markotter, Wanda</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Weber, Natalie</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:abstract>Africa experiences frequent emerging disease outbreaks among humans, with bats often proposed as zoonotic pathogen hosts. We comprehensively reviewed virus–bat findings from papers published between 1978 and 2020 to evaluate the evidence that African bats are reservoir and/or bridging hosts for viruses that cause human disease. We present data from 162 papers (of 1322) with original findings on (1) numbers and species of bats sampled across bat families and the continent, (2) how bats were selected for study inclusion, (3) if bats were terminally sampled, (4) what types of ecological data, if any, were recorded and (5) which viruses were detected and with what methodology. We propose a scheme for evaluating presumed virus–host relationships by evidence type and quality, using the contrasting available evidence for Orthoebolavirus versus Orthomarburgvirus as an example. We review the wording in abstracts and discussions of all 162 papers, identifying key framing terms, how these refer to findings, and how they might contribute to people's beliefs about bats. We discuss the impact of scientific research communication on public perception and emphasize the need for strategies that minimize human–bat conflict and support bat conservation. Finally, we make recommendations for best practices that will improve virological study metadata.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dc:contributor>Wikelski, Martin</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Wikelski, Martin</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:issued>2023</dcterms:issued>
    <dcterms:title>Robust evidence for bats as reservoir hosts is lacking in most African virus studies : a review and call to optimize sampling and conserve bats</dcterms:title>
    <dc:creator>Dechmann, Dina K. N.</dc:creator>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2023-11-20T08:33:34Z</dc:date>
    <dc:contributor>Schaer, Juliane</dc:contributor>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/68275"/>
    <dc:creator>Dávalos, Liliana M.</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/68275/1/Weber_2-kv1tzlp5g5191.pdf"/>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/28"/>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/28"/>
    <dc:contributor>Dechmann, Dina K. N.</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Weber, Natalie</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>O'Mara, Michael Teague</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>O'Mara, Michael Teague</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Markotter, Wanda</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Schaer, Juliane</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Sutton, Jack</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Puechmaille, Sébastien J.</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Sutton, Jack</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Nagy, Martina</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Dávalos, Liliana M.</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2023-11-20T08:33:34Z</dcterms:available>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
kops.description.openAccessopenaccesshybrid
kops.flag.etalAuthortrue
kops.flag.isPeerReviewedtrue
kops.flag.knbibliographytrue
kops.identifier.nbnurn:nbn:de:bsz:352-2-kv1tzlp5g5191
kops.sourcefieldBiology Letters. Royal Society of London. 2023, <b>19</b>(11), 20230358. ISSN 1744-9561. eISSN 1744-957X. Available under: doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2023.0358deu
kops.sourcefield.plainBiology Letters. Royal Society of London. 2023, 19(11), 20230358. ISSN 1744-9561. eISSN 1744-957X. Available under: doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2023.0358deu
kops.sourcefield.plainBiology Letters. Royal Society of London. 2023, 19(11), 20230358. ISSN 1744-9561. eISSN 1744-957X. Available under: doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2023.0358eng
relation.isAuthorOfPublication788c1693-2341-445c-b6d3-907814e36314
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationf6475e1f-b263-4ee3-befb-89080e48568e
relation.isAuthorOfPublication21156df6-5e28-43f7-9cca-3e34d8d84247
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryf6475e1f-b263-4ee3-befb-89080e48568e
source.bibliographicInfo.articleNumber20230358
source.bibliographicInfo.issue11
source.bibliographicInfo.volume19
source.identifier.eissn1744-957X
source.identifier.issn1744-9561
source.periodicalTitleBiology Letters
source.publisherRoyal Society of London

Dateien

Originalbündel

Gerade angezeigt 1 - 1 von 1
Vorschaubild nicht verfügbar
Name:
Weber_2-kv1tzlp5g5191.pdf
Größe:
1.22 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Weber_2-kv1tzlp5g5191.pdf
Weber_2-kv1tzlp5g5191.pdfGröße: 1.22 MBDownloads: 127