Against Michael Hand’s 'Against Autonomy as An Educational Aim'
| dc.contributor.author | Wendelborn, Christian | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2020-08-24T13:13:06Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2020-08-24T13:13:06Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2020-05-24 | eng |
| dc.description.abstract | Michael Hand argues in his article ‘Against autonomy as an educational aim’ that the project of erecting autonomy as an educational aim is wrongheaded. I argue that his argument fails. I discuss two lines of his argument that deal with different senses of autonomy. The first line of argument trades on an ambiguity. As soon as we disambiguate, we can see that this argument is not cogent. The second misconstrues the point of the concept of autonomy Hand discusses in this line of argument. | eng |
| dc.description.version | published | de |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/03054985.2020.1759520 | eng |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/50557 | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | eng |
| dc.subject | Autonomy; educational aim; Michael Hand; ambiguity; second-order desires; Harry Frankfurt | eng |
| dc.subject.ddc | 100 | eng |
| dc.title | Against Michael Hand’s 'Against Autonomy as An Educational Aim' | eng |
| dc.type | JOURNAL_ARTICLE | de |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| kops.citation.bibtex | @article{Wendelborn2020-05-24Again-50557,
year={2020},
doi={10.1080/03054985.2020.1759520},
title={Against Michael Hand’s 'Against Autonomy as An Educational Aim'},
number={6},
volume={46},
issn={0305-4985},
journal={Oxford Review of Education},
pages={661--671},
author={Wendelborn, Christian}
} | |
| kops.citation.iso690 | WENDELBORN, Christian, 2020. Against Michael Hand’s 'Against Autonomy as An Educational Aim'. In: Oxford Review of Education. Routledge, Taylor & Francis. 2020, 46(6), pp. 661-671. ISSN 0305-4985. eISSN 1465-3915. Available under: doi: 10.1080/03054985.2020.1759520 | deu |
| kops.citation.iso690 | WENDELBORN, Christian, 2020. Against Michael Hand’s 'Against Autonomy as An Educational Aim'. In: Oxford Review of Education. Routledge, Taylor & Francis. 2020, 46(6), pp. 661-671. ISSN 0305-4985. eISSN 1465-3915. Available under: doi: 10.1080/03054985.2020.1759520 | eng |
| kops.citation.rdf | <rdf:RDF
xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" >
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/50557">
<dc:contributor>Wendelborn, Christian</dc:contributor>
<dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2020-08-24T13:13:06Z</dcterms:available>
<dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Michael Hand argues in his article ‘Against autonomy as an educational aim’ that the project of erecting autonomy as an educational aim is wrongheaded. I argue that his argument fails. I discuss two lines of his argument that deal with different senses of autonomy. The first line of argument trades on an ambiguity. As soon as we disambiguate, we can see that this argument is not cogent. The second misconstrues the point of the concept of autonomy Hand discusses in this line of argument.</dcterms:abstract>
<bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/50557"/>
<foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
<dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/>
<dcterms:title>Against Michael Hand’s 'Against Autonomy as An Educational Aim'</dcterms:title>
<dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2020-08-24T13:13:06Z</dc:date>
<dc:creator>Wendelborn, Christian</dc:creator>
<dcterms:issued>2020-05-24</dcterms:issued>
<dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF> | |
| kops.flag.isPeerReviewed | true | eng |
| kops.flag.knbibliography | true | |
| kops.sourcefield | Oxford Review of Education. Routledge, Taylor & Francis. 2020, <b>46</b>(6), pp. 661-671. ISSN 0305-4985. eISSN 1465-3915. Available under: doi: 10.1080/03054985.2020.1759520 | deu |
| kops.sourcefield.plain | Oxford Review of Education. Routledge, Taylor & Francis. 2020, 46(6), pp. 661-671. ISSN 0305-4985. eISSN 1465-3915. Available under: doi: 10.1080/03054985.2020.1759520 | deu |
| kops.sourcefield.plain | Oxford Review of Education. Routledge, Taylor & Francis. 2020, 46(6), pp. 661-671. ISSN 0305-4985. eISSN 1465-3915. Available under: doi: 10.1080/03054985.2020.1759520 | eng |
| relation.isAuthorOfPublication | ca18e01c-869e-4149-8737-cef1d976f4a3 | |
| relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | ca18e01c-869e-4149-8737-cef1d976f4a3 | |
| source.bibliographicInfo.fromPage | 661 | |
| source.bibliographicInfo.issue | 6 | |
| source.bibliographicInfo.toPage | 671 | |
| source.bibliographicInfo.volume | 46 | |
| source.identifier.eissn | 1465-3915 | eng |
| source.identifier.issn | 0305-4985 | eng |
| source.periodicalTitle | Oxford Review of Education | eng |
| source.publisher | Routledge, Taylor & Francis | eng |