Against Michael Hand’s 'Against Autonomy as An Educational Aim'
Lade...
Dateien
Zu diesem Dokument gibt es keine Dateien.
Datum
2020
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published
Erschienen in
Oxford Review of Education. Routledge, Taylor & Francis. 2020, 46(6), pp. 661-671. ISSN 0305-4985. eISSN 1465-3915. Available under: doi: 10.1080/03054985.2020.1759520
Zusammenfassung
Michael Hand argues in his article ‘Against autonomy as an educational aim’ that the project of erecting autonomy as an educational aim is wrongheaded. I argue that his argument fails. I discuss two lines of his argument that deal with different senses of autonomy. The first line of argument trades on an ambiguity. As soon as we disambiguate, we can see that this argument is not cogent. The second misconstrues the point of the concept of autonomy Hand discusses in this line of argument.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
100 Philosophie
Schlagwörter
Autonomy; educational aim; Michael Hand; ambiguity; second-order desires; Harry Frankfurt
Konferenz
Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined
Zitieren
ISO 690
WENDELBORN, Christian, 2020. Against Michael Hand’s 'Against Autonomy as An Educational Aim'. In: Oxford Review of Education. Routledge, Taylor & Francis. 2020, 46(6), pp. 661-671. ISSN 0305-4985. eISSN 1465-3915. Available under: doi: 10.1080/03054985.2020.1759520BibTex
@article{Wendelborn2020-05-24Again-50557, year={2020}, doi={10.1080/03054985.2020.1759520}, title={Against Michael Hand’s 'Against Autonomy as An Educational Aim'}, number={6}, volume={46}, issn={0305-4985}, journal={Oxford Review of Education}, pages={661--671}, author={Wendelborn, Christian} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/50557"> <dc:contributor>Wendelborn, Christian</dc:contributor> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2020-08-24T13:13:06Z</dcterms:available> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Michael Hand argues in his article ‘Against autonomy as an educational aim’ that the project of erecting autonomy as an educational aim is wrongheaded. I argue that his argument fails. I discuss two lines of his argument that deal with different senses of autonomy. The first line of argument trades on an ambiguity. As soon as we disambiguate, we can see that this argument is not cogent. The second misconstrues the point of the concept of autonomy Hand discusses in this line of argument.</dcterms:abstract> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/50557"/> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/> <dcterms:title>Against Michael Hand’s 'Against Autonomy as An Educational Aim'</dcterms:title> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2020-08-24T13:13:06Z</dc:date> <dc:creator>Wendelborn, Christian</dc:creator> <dcterms:issued>2020-05-24</dcterms:issued> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>
Interner Vermerk
xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter
Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation
Finanzierungsart
Kommentar zur Publikation
Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Ja
Begutachtet
Ja