Disrupting Diagnostic Reasoning : Do Interruptions, Instructions, and Experience Affect the Diagnostic Accuracy and Response Time of Residents and Emergency Physicians?
Dateien
Datum
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Publikationsstatus
Erschienen in
Zusammenfassung
Purpose: Others have suggested that increased time pressure, sometimes caused by interruptions, may result in increased diagnostic errors. The authors previously found, however, that increased time pressure alone does not result in increased errors, but they did not test the effect of interruptions. It is unclear whether experience modulates the combined effects of time pressure and interruptions. This study investigated whether increased time pressure, interruptions, and experience level affect diagnostic accuracy and response time.
Method: In October 2012, 152 residents were recruited at five Medical Council of Canada Qualifying Examination Part II test sites. Forty-six emergency physicians were recruited from one Canadian and one U.S. academic health center. Participants diagnosed 20 written general medicine cases. They were randomly assigned to receive fast (time pressure) or slow condition instructions. Visual and auditory case interruptions were manipulated as a within-subject factor.
Results: Diagnostic accuracy was not affected by interruptions or time pressure but was related to experience level: Emergency physicians were more accurate (71%) than residents (43%) (F = 234.0, P < .0001) and responded more quickly (54 seconds) than residents (65 seconds) (F = 9.0, P < .005). Response time was shorter for participants in the fast condition (55 seconds) than in the slow condition (73 seconds) (F = 22.2, P < .0001). Interruptions added about 8 seconds to response time.
Conclusions: Experienced emergency physicians were both faster and more accurate than residents. Instructions to proceed quickly and interruptions had a small effect on response time but no effect on accuracy.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
Zitieren
ISO 690
MONTEIRO, Sandra D., Jonathan David SHERBINO, Jonathan Seth ILGEN, Kelly L. DORE, Timothy J. WOOD, Meredith E. YOUNG, Glen BANDIERA, Danielle BLOUIN, Wolfgang GAISSMAIER, Geoffrey R. NORMAN, Elizabeth HOWEY, 2015. Disrupting Diagnostic Reasoning : Do Interruptions, Instructions, and Experience Affect the Diagnostic Accuracy and Response Time of Residents and Emergency Physicians?. In: Academic Medicine. 2015, 90(4), pp. 511-517. ISSN 0022-2577. eISSN 1938-808X. Available under: doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000614BibTex
@article{Monteiro2015Disru-31299, year={2015}, doi={10.1097/ACM.0000000000000614}, title={Disrupting Diagnostic Reasoning : Do Interruptions, Instructions, and Experience Affect the Diagnostic Accuracy and Response Time of Residents and Emergency Physicians?}, number={4}, volume={90}, issn={0022-2577}, journal={Academic Medicine}, pages={511--517}, author={Monteiro, Sandra D. and Sherbino, Jonathan David and Ilgen, Jonathan Seth and Dore, Kelly L. and Wood, Timothy J. and Young, Meredith E. and Bandiera, Glen and Blouin, Danielle and Gaissmaier, Wolfgang and Norman, Geoffrey R. and Howey, Elizabeth} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/31299"> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dc:creator>Norman, Geoffrey R.</dc:creator> <dc:contributor>Norman, Geoffrey R.</dc:contributor> <dc:creator>Wood, Timothy J.</dc:creator> <dc:creator>Sherbino, Jonathan David</dc:creator> <dc:contributor>Sherbino, Jonathan David</dc:contributor> <dc:creator>Bandiera, Glen</dc:creator> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2015-06-26T07:57:19Z</dcterms:available> <dc:creator>Howey, Elizabeth</dc:creator> <dc:creator>Monteiro, Sandra D.</dc:creator> <dcterms:issued>2015</dcterms:issued> <dc:contributor>Ilgen, Jonathan Seth</dc:contributor> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/31299"/> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dc:creator>Young, Meredith E.</dc:creator> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2015-06-26T07:57:19Z</dc:date> <dc:contributor>Gaissmaier, Wolfgang</dc:contributor> <dc:contributor>Dore, Kelly L.</dc:contributor> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Purpose: Others have suggested that increased time pressure, sometimes caused by interruptions, may result in increased diagnostic errors. The authors previously found, however, that increased time pressure alone does not result in increased errors, but they did not test the effect of interruptions. It is unclear whether experience modulates the combined effects of time pressure and interruptions. This study investigated whether increased time pressure, interruptions, and experience level affect diagnostic accuracy and response time.<br /><br />Method: In October 2012, 152 residents were recruited at five Medical Council of Canada Qualifying Examination Part II test sites. Forty-six emergency physicians were recruited from one Canadian and one U.S. academic health center. Participants diagnosed 20 written general medicine cases. They were randomly assigned to receive fast (time pressure) or slow condition instructions. Visual and auditory case interruptions were manipulated as a within-subject factor.<br /><br />Results: Diagnostic accuracy was not affected by interruptions or time pressure but was related to experience level: Emergency physicians were more accurate (71%) than residents (43%) (F = 234.0, P < .0001) and responded more quickly (54 seconds) than residents (65 seconds) (F = 9.0, P < .005). Response time was shorter for participants in the fast condition (55 seconds) than in the slow condition (73 seconds) (F = 22.2, P < .0001). Interruptions added about 8 seconds to response time.<br /><br />Conclusions: Experienced emergency physicians were both faster and more accurate than residents. Instructions to proceed quickly and interruptions had a small effect on response time but no effect on accuracy.</dcterms:abstract> <dcterms:title>Disrupting Diagnostic Reasoning : Do Interruptions, Instructions, and Experience Affect the Diagnostic Accuracy and Response Time of Residents and Emergency Physicians?</dcterms:title> <dc:creator>Ilgen, Jonathan Seth</dc:creator> <dc:contributor>Young, Meredith E.</dc:contributor> <dc:contributor>Howey, Elizabeth</dc:contributor> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <dc:contributor>Wood, Timothy J.</dc:contributor> <dc:contributor>Bandiera, Glen</dc:contributor> <dc:contributor>Blouin, Danielle</dc:contributor> <dc:creator>Blouin, Danielle</dc:creator> <dc:creator>Gaissmaier, Wolfgang</dc:creator> <dc:contributor>Monteiro, Sandra D.</dc:contributor> <dc:creator>Dore, Kelly L.</dc:creator> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>