Publikation: International bureaucrats in the UN Security Council debates : A speaker-topic network analysis
Lade...
Dateien
Datum
2023
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
URI (zitierfähiger Link)
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Link zur Lizenz
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Open Access Hybrid
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published
Erschienen in
Journal of European Public Policy. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. 2023, 30(2), S. 214-233. ISSN 1350-1763. eISSN 1466-4429. Verfügbar unter: doi: 10.1080/13501763.2021.1998194
Zusammenfassung
Intergovernmental deliberations in the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) are typically considered the realm of sovereign nation states. We challenge this position by studying the role of the UN Secretariat in UNSC debates, focusing on the debates on Afghanistan (1995–2017). We combine natural language processing with a network theoretical perspective to observe speaker position, topic introduction, and topic evolution and we complement this analysis with an illustrative case study. The quantitative analysis shows that UN officials take an overall impartial position but that they do, at times, introduce and promote their own topics putting them in the position to shape the debate. The qualitative case study selects one ‘bureaucratic topic’ to confirm bureaucratic agency. Combined, our methods allow to study the role of speakers in a debate and show that the UN bureaucracy acted as an autonomous speechmaker even in a venue were bureaucratic agency seems unlikely – the UNSC.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
320 Politik
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined
Zitieren
ISO 690
ECKHARD, Steffen, Ronny PATZ, Mirco SCHÖNFELD, Hilde VAN MEEGDENBURG, 2023. International bureaucrats in the UN Security Council debates : A speaker-topic network analysis. In: Journal of European Public Policy. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. 2023, 30(2), S. 214-233. ISSN 1350-1763. eISSN 1466-4429. Verfügbar unter: doi: 10.1080/13501763.2021.1998194BibTex
@article{Eckhard2023Inter-55570,
title={International bureaucrats in the UN Security Council debates : A speaker-topic network analysis},
year={2023},
doi={10.1080/13501763.2021.1998194},
number={2},
volume={30},
issn={1350-1763},
journal={Journal of European Public Policy},
pages={214--233},
author={Eckhard, Steffen and Patz, Ronny and Schönfeld, Mirco and van Meegdenburg, Hilde}
}RDF
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" >
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/55570">
<dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-11-17T07:06:31Z</dc:date>
<bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/55570"/>
<dc:rights>Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International</dc:rights>
<dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
<dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/55570/1/Eckhard_2-z9347qf03tb34.pdf"/>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dc:creator>Eckhard, Steffen</dc:creator>
<dc:contributor>Schönfeld, Mirco</dc:contributor>
<dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/55570/1/Eckhard_2-z9347qf03tb34.pdf"/>
<dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-11-17T07:06:31Z</dcterms:available>
<dc:creator>Patz, Ronny</dc:creator>
<dc:contributor>Eckhard, Steffen</dc:contributor>
<void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
<dc:creator>Schönfeld, Mirco</dc:creator>
<foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
<dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
<dc:contributor>Patz, Ronny</dc:contributor>
<dc:creator>van Meegdenburg, Hilde</dc:creator>
<dc:contributor>van Meegdenburg, Hilde</dc:contributor>
<dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Intergovernmental deliberations in the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) are typically considered the realm of sovereign nation states. We challenge this position by studying the role of the UN Secretariat in UNSC debates, focusing on the debates on Afghanistan (1995–2017). We combine natural language processing with a network theoretical perspective to observe speaker position, topic introduction, and topic evolution and we complement this analysis with an illustrative case study. The quantitative analysis shows that UN officials take an overall impartial position but that they do, at times, introduce and promote their own topics putting them in the position to shape the debate. The qualitative case study selects one ‘bureaucratic topic’ to confirm bureaucratic agency. Combined, our methods allow to study the role of speakers in a debate and show that the UN bureaucracy acted as an autonomous speechmaker even in a venue were bureaucratic agency seems unlikely – the UNSC.</dcterms:abstract>
<dcterms:title>International bureaucrats in the UN Security Council debates : A speaker-topic network analysis</dcterms:title>
<dcterms:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/"/>
<dcterms:issued>2023</dcterms:issued>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>Interner Vermerk
xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter
Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation
Finanzierungsart
Kommentar zur Publikation
Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Ja
Begutachtet
Ja
Link zu Forschungsdaten
Beschreibung der Forschungsdaten
Related Research Data
