Datensatz:

International bureaucrats in the UN Security Council debates : A speaker-topic network analysis

Lade...
Vorschaubild

Datum der Erstveröffentlichung

2021

Autor:innen

Patz, Ronny
Schönfeld, Mirco
van Meegdenburg, Hilde

Andere Beitragende

Repositorium der Erstveröffentlichung

figshare Academic Research System

Version des Datensatzes

Link zur Lizenz

Angaben zur Forschungsförderung

Projekt

Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Bewerten Sie die FAIRness der Forschungsdaten

Gesperrt bis

Titel in einer weiteren Sprache

Publikationsstatus
Published

Zusammenfassung

Intergovernmental deliberations in the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) are typically considered the realm of sovereign nation states. We challenge this position by studying the role of the UN Secretariat in UNSC debates, focusing on the debates on Afghanistan (1995–2017). We combine natural language processing with a network theoretical perspective to observe speaker position, topic introduction, and topic evolution and we complement this analysis with an illustrative case study. The quantitative analysis shows that UN officials take an overall impartial position but that they do, at times, introduce and promote their own topics putting them in the position to shape the debate. The qualitative case study selects one ‘bureaucratic topic’ to confirm bureaucratic agency. Combined, our methods allow to study the role of speakers in a debate and show that the UN bureaucracy acted as an autonomous speechmaker even in a venue were bureaucratic agency seems unlikely – the UNSC.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache

Fachgebiet (DDC)
320 Politik

Schlagwörter

Natural language processing, Speaker-topic network, Topic modelling, International public administration, Afghanistan

Zugehörige Publikationen in KOPS

Publikation
Zeitschriftenartikel
International bureaucrats in the UN Security Council debates : A speaker-topic network analysis
(2023) Eckhard, Steffen; Patz, Ronny; Schönfeld, Mirco; van Meegdenburg, Hilde
Erschienen in: Journal of European Public Policy. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. 2023, 30(2), S. 214-233. ISSN 1350-1763. eISSN 1466-4429. Verfügbar unter: doi: 10.1080/13501763.2021.1998194
Link zu zugehöriger Publikation
Link zu zugehörigem Datensatz

Zitieren

ISO 690ECKHARD, Steffen, Ronny PATZ, Mirco SCHÖNFELD, Hilde VAN MEEGDENBURG, 2021. International bureaucrats in the UN Security Council debates : A speaker-topic network analysis
BibTex
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/72344">
    <dcterms:title>International bureaucrats in the UN Security Council debates : A speaker-topic network analysis</dcterms:title>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/72344"/>
    <dcterms:issued>2021</dcterms:issued>
    <dc:rights>Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International</dc:rights>
    <dc:creator>Eckhard, Steffen</dc:creator>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2025-02-14T12:10:49Z</dc:date>
    <dc:contributor>Patz, Ronny</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Eckhard, Steffen</dc:contributor>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2025-02-14T12:10:49Z</dcterms:available>
    <dc:creator>Schönfeld, Mirco</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Schönfeld, Mirco</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:abstract>Intergovernmental deliberations in the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) are typically considered the realm of sovereign nation states. We challenge this position by studying the role of the UN Secretariat in UNSC debates, focusing on the debates on Afghanistan (1995–2017). We combine natural language processing with a network theoretical perspective to observe speaker position, topic introduction, and topic evolution and we complement this analysis with an illustrative case study. The quantitative analysis shows that UN officials take an overall impartial position but that they do, at times, introduce and promote their own topics putting them in the position to shape the debate. The qualitative case study selects one ‘bureaucratic topic’ to confirm bureaucratic agency. Combined, our methods allow to study the role of speakers in a debate and show that the UN bureaucracy acted as an autonomous speechmaker even in a venue were bureaucratic agency seems unlikely – the UNSC.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode"/>
    <dc:creator>Patz, Ronny</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>van Meegdenburg, Hilde</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>van Meegdenburg, Hilde</dc:creator>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/71935"/>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/71935"/>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dcterms:created rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-11-12T06:00:17.000Z</dcterms:created>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
URL (Link zu den Daten)

Prüfdatum der URL

Kommentar zur Publikation

Universitätsbibliographie
Diese Publikation teilen