Filling the prefield : Findings and challenges

dc.contributor.authorBader, Markus
dc.contributor.authorEllsiepen, Emilia
dc.contributor.authorKoukoulioti, Vasiliki
dc.contributor.authorPortele, Yvonne
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-27T11:24:30Z
dc.date.available2017-01-27T11:24:30Z
dc.date.issued2017eng
dc.description.abstractThe clause-initial position in German declarative main clauses – the so-called prefield – can be rather flexibly filled with almost any kind of constituent. In the first part of this paper, we give an overview of recent experiments that we ran to investigate the factors governing whether the subject or the object of a transitive verb is put into the prefield. The factors that we tested include the semantic roles assigned by the verb, the animacy of the arguments and the discourse status of the arguments. In agreement with findings from the prior literature, participants put the object argument into the prefield when this was favored by the manipulated factors, but they did not use object fronting for this purpose but passivization instead.
Corpus counts nevertheless show that object-initial sentences occur with some regularity, even if their frequency is low in comparison to subject-initial sentences. In the second part of this paper, we therefore make use of corpus evidence in order to explore the conditions under which object-initial sentences are produced. A conclusion emerging from our discussion is that the referential form of an object is an additional factor governing whether it is put into the prefield or not. This conclusion is supported by additional evidence from experiments obtaining acceptability judgments.
eng
dc.description.versionpublishedde
dc.identifier.ppn482830042
dc.identifier.urihttps://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/36968
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.rightsterms-of-use
dc.rights.urihttps://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectword order, German, language production, conceptual accessibility, discourse structure, referential formeng
dc.subject.ddc400eng
dc.titleFilling the prefield : Findings and challengeseng
dc.typeINPROCEEDINGSde
dspace.entity.typePublication
kops.citation.bibtex
@inproceedings{Bader2017Filli-36968,
  year={2017},
  title={Filling the prefield : Findings and challenges},
  publisher={University of Konstanz},
  address={Konstanz},
  booktitle={Two perspectives on V2 : The invited talks of the DGfS 2016 workshop “V2 in grammar and processing: Its causes and its consequences”},
  pages={27--49},
  editor={Freitag, Constantin and Bott, Oliver and Schlotterbeck, Fabian},
  author={Bader, Markus and Ellsiepen, Emilia and Koukoulioti, Vasiliki and Portele, Yvonne}
}
kops.citation.iso690BADER, Markus, Emilia ELLSIEPEN, Vasiliki KOUKOULIOTI, Yvonne PORTELE, 2017. Filling the prefield : Findings and challenges. DGfS 2016 workshop “V2 in grammar and processing: Its causes and its consequences”. Konstanz, 24. Feb. 2016 - 26. Feb. 2016. In: FREITAG, Constantin, ed., Oliver BOTT, ed., Fabian SCHLOTTERBECK, ed.. Two perspectives on V2 : The invited talks of the DGfS 2016 workshop “V2 in grammar and processing: Its causes and its consequences”. Konstanz: University of Konstanz, 2017, pp. 27-49deu
kops.citation.iso690BADER, Markus, Emilia ELLSIEPEN, Vasiliki KOUKOULIOTI, Yvonne PORTELE, 2017. Filling the prefield : Findings and challenges. DGfS 2016 workshop “V2 in grammar and processing: Its causes and its consequences”. Konstanz, Feb 24, 2016 - Feb 26, 2016. In: FREITAG, Constantin, ed., Oliver BOTT, ed., Fabian SCHLOTTERBECK, ed.. Two perspectives on V2 : The invited talks of the DGfS 2016 workshop “V2 in grammar and processing: Its causes and its consequences”. Konstanz: University of Konstanz, 2017, pp. 27-49eng
kops.citation.rdf
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/36968">
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dc:contributor>Ellsiepen, Emilia</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Portele, Yvonne</dc:contributor>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2017-01-27T11:24:30Z</dcterms:available>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
    <dc:contributor>Koukoulioti, Vasiliki</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Bader, Markus</dc:contributor>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/36968"/>
    <dcterms:issued>2017</dcterms:issued>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">The clause-initial position in German declarative main clauses – the so-called prefield – can be rather flexibly filled with almost any kind of constituent. In the first part of this paper, we give an overview of recent experiments that we ran to investigate the factors governing whether the subject or the object of a transitive verb is put into the prefield. The factors that we tested include the semantic roles assigned by the verb, the animacy of the arguments and the discourse status of the arguments. In agreement with findings from the prior literature, participants put the object argument into the prefield when this was favored by the manipulated factors, but they did not use object fronting for this purpose but passivization instead.&lt;br /&gt;Corpus counts nevertheless show that object-initial sentences occur with some regularity, even if their frequency is low in comparison to subject-initial sentences. In the second part of this paper, we therefore make use of corpus evidence in order to explore the conditions under which object-initial sentences are produced. A conclusion emerging from our discussion is that the referential form of an object is an additional factor governing whether it is put into the prefield or not. This conclusion is supported by additional evidence from experiments obtaining acceptability judgments.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dcterms:title>Filling the prefield : Findings and challenges</dcterms:title>
    <dc:creator>Koukoulioti, Vasiliki</dc:creator>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2017-01-27T11:24:30Z</dc:date>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/36968/1/Bader_0-390234.pdf"/>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/36968/1/Bader_0-390234.pdf"/>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/45"/>
    <dc:creator>Portele, Yvonne</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Ellsiepen, Emilia</dc:creator>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dc:creator>Bader, Markus</dc:creator>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/45"/>
    <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
kops.conferencefieldDGfS 2016 workshop “V2 in grammar and processing: Its causes and its consequences”, 24. Feb. 2016 - 26. Feb. 2016, Konstanzdeu
kops.date.conferenceEnd2016-02-26eng
kops.date.conferenceStart2016-02-24eng
kops.description.openAccessopenaccessgreen
kops.flag.knbibliographyfalse
kops.identifier.nbnurn:nbn:de:bsz:352-0-390234
kops.location.conferenceKonstanzeng
kops.sourcefieldFREITAG, Constantin, ed., Oliver BOTT, ed., Fabian SCHLOTTERBECK, ed.. <i>Two perspectives on V2 : The invited talks of the DGfS 2016 workshop “V2 in grammar and processing: Its causes and its consequences”</i>. Konstanz: University of Konstanz, 2017, pp. 27-49deu
kops.sourcefield.plainFREITAG, Constantin, ed., Oliver BOTT, ed., Fabian SCHLOTTERBECK, ed.. Two perspectives on V2 : The invited talks of the DGfS 2016 workshop “V2 in grammar and processing: Its causes and its consequences”. Konstanz: University of Konstanz, 2017, pp. 27-49deu
kops.sourcefield.plainFREITAG, Constantin, ed., Oliver BOTT, ed., Fabian SCHLOTTERBECK, ed.. Two perspectives on V2 : The invited talks of the DGfS 2016 workshop “V2 in grammar and processing: Its causes and its consequences”. Konstanz: University of Konstanz, 2017, pp. 27-49eng
kops.title.conferenceDGfS 2016 workshop “V2 in grammar and processing: Its causes and its consequences”eng
relation.isAuthorOfPublication0aa63101-5f7e-4ae4-8aac-689482a9fc2e
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery0aa63101-5f7e-4ae4-8aac-689482a9fc2e
source.bibliographicInfo.fromPage27eng
source.bibliographicInfo.toPage49eng
source.contributor.editorFreitag, Constantin
source.contributor.editorBott, Oliver
source.contributor.editorSchlotterbeck, Fabian
source.publisherUniversity of Konstanzeng
source.publisher.locationKonstanzeng
source.titleTwo perspectives on V2 : The invited talks of the DGfS 2016 workshop “V2 in grammar and processing: Its causes and its consequences”eng

Dateien

Originalbündel

Gerade angezeigt 1 - 1 von 1
Vorschaubild nicht verfügbar
Name:
Bader_0-390234.pdf
Größe:
701.5 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Beschreibung:
Bader_0-390234.pdf
Bader_0-390234.pdfGröße: 701.5 KBDownloads: 443