Publikation:

Filling the prefield : Findings and challenges

Lade...
Vorschaubild

Dateien

Bader_0-390234.pdf
Bader_0-390234.pdfGröße: 701.5 KBDownloads: 383

Datum

2017

Autor:innen

Ellsiepen, Emilia
Koukoulioti, Vasiliki
Portele, Yvonne

Herausgeber:innen

Kontakt

ISSN der Zeitschrift

Electronic ISSN

ISBN

Bibliografische Daten

Verlag

Schriftenreihe

Auflagebezeichnung

DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
ArXiv-ID

Internationale Patentnummer

Angaben zur Forschungsförderung

Projekt

Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Open Access Green
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz

Gesperrt bis

Titel in einer weiteren Sprache

Publikationstyp
Beitrag zu einem Konferenzband
Publikationsstatus
Published

Erschienen in

FREITAG, Constantin, ed., Oliver BOTT, ed., Fabian SCHLOTTERBECK, ed.. Two perspectives on V2 : The invited talks of the DGfS 2016 workshop “V2 in grammar and processing: Its causes and its consequences”. Konstanz: University of Konstanz, 2017, pp. 27-49

Zusammenfassung

The clause-initial position in German declarative main clauses – the so-called prefield – can be rather flexibly filled with almost any kind of constituent. In the first part of this paper, we give an overview of recent experiments that we ran to investigate the factors governing whether the subject or the object of a transitive verb is put into the prefield. The factors that we tested include the semantic roles assigned by the verb, the animacy of the arguments and the discourse status of the arguments. In agreement with findings from the prior literature, participants put the object argument into the prefield when this was favored by the manipulated factors, but they did not use object fronting for this purpose but passivization instead.
Corpus counts nevertheless show that object-initial sentences occur with some regularity, even if their frequency is low in comparison to subject-initial sentences. In the second part of this paper, we therefore make use of corpus evidence in order to explore the conditions under which object-initial sentences are produced. A conclusion emerging from our discussion is that the referential form of an object is an additional factor governing whether it is put into the prefield or not. This conclusion is supported by additional evidence from experiments obtaining acceptability judgments.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache

Fachgebiet (DDC)
400 Sprachwissenschaft, Linguistik

Schlagwörter

word order, German, language production, conceptual accessibility, discourse structure, referential form

Konferenz

DGfS 2016 workshop “V2 in grammar and processing: Its causes and its consequences”, 24. Feb. 2016 - 26. Feb. 2016, Konstanz
Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined

Forschungsvorhaben

Organisationseinheiten

Zeitschriftenheft

Zugehörige Datensätze in KOPS

Zitieren

ISO 690BADER, Markus, Emilia ELLSIEPEN, Vasiliki KOUKOULIOTI, Yvonne PORTELE, 2017. Filling the prefield : Findings and challenges. DGfS 2016 workshop “V2 in grammar and processing: Its causes and its consequences”. Konstanz, 24. Feb. 2016 - 26. Feb. 2016. In: FREITAG, Constantin, ed., Oliver BOTT, ed., Fabian SCHLOTTERBECK, ed.. Two perspectives on V2 : The invited talks of the DGfS 2016 workshop “V2 in grammar and processing: Its causes and its consequences”. Konstanz: University of Konstanz, 2017, pp. 27-49
BibTex
@inproceedings{Bader2017Filli-36968,
  year={2017},
  title={Filling the prefield : Findings and challenges},
  publisher={University of Konstanz},
  address={Konstanz},
  booktitle={Two perspectives on V2 : The invited talks of the DGfS 2016 workshop “V2 in grammar and processing: Its causes and its consequences”},
  pages={27--49},
  editor={Freitag, Constantin and Bott, Oliver and Schlotterbeck, Fabian},
  author={Bader, Markus and Ellsiepen, Emilia and Koukoulioti, Vasiliki and Portele, Yvonne}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/36968">
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dc:contributor>Ellsiepen, Emilia</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Portele, Yvonne</dc:contributor>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2017-01-27T11:24:30Z</dcterms:available>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
    <dc:contributor>Koukoulioti, Vasiliki</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Bader, Markus</dc:contributor>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/36968"/>
    <dcterms:issued>2017</dcterms:issued>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">The clause-initial position in German declarative main clauses – the so-called prefield – can be rather flexibly filled with almost any kind of constituent. In the first part of this paper, we give an overview of recent experiments that we ran to investigate the factors governing whether the subject or the object of a transitive verb is put into the prefield. The factors that we tested include the semantic roles assigned by the verb, the animacy of the arguments and the discourse status of the arguments. In agreement with findings from the prior literature, participants put the object argument into the prefield when this was favored by the manipulated factors, but they did not use object fronting for this purpose but passivization instead.&lt;br /&gt;Corpus counts nevertheless show that object-initial sentences occur with some regularity, even if their frequency is low in comparison to subject-initial sentences. In the second part of this paper, we therefore make use of corpus evidence in order to explore the conditions under which object-initial sentences are produced. A conclusion emerging from our discussion is that the referential form of an object is an additional factor governing whether it is put into the prefield or not. This conclusion is supported by additional evidence from experiments obtaining acceptability judgments.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dcterms:title>Filling the prefield : Findings and challenges</dcterms:title>
    <dc:creator>Koukoulioti, Vasiliki</dc:creator>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2017-01-27T11:24:30Z</dc:date>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/36968/1/Bader_0-390234.pdf"/>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/36968/1/Bader_0-390234.pdf"/>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/45"/>
    <dc:creator>Portele, Yvonne</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Ellsiepen, Emilia</dc:creator>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dc:creator>Bader, Markus</dc:creator>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/45"/>
    <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Interner Vermerk

xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter

Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.

Prüfdatum der URL

Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation

Finanzierungsart

Kommentar zur Publikation

Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Nein
Begutachtet
Diese Publikation teilen