Strategies of intention formation are reflected in continuous MEG activity

dc.contributor.authorAchtziger, Anja
dc.contributor.authorFehr, Thorstendeu
dc.contributor.authorOettingen, Gabrieledeu
dc.contributor.authorGollwitzer, Peter M.
dc.contributor.authorRockstroh, Brigitte
dc.date.accessioned2011-03-25T09:16:26Zdeu
dc.date.available2011-03-25T09:16:26Zdeu
dc.date.issued2008deu
dc.description.abstractSelf-regulation of intention formation is pivotal for achieving behavior change. Fantasy realization theory (Oettingen, 2000) assumes that mentally contrasting a desired positive future with present negative reality turns high expectations of success into strong intentions to realize the desired future, while indulging in the positive future fails to do so. The present study tests the theory s process assumption that mental contrasting is a cognitively demanding, purposeful problem-solving strategy involving working and episodic memory, whereas indulging is a mindless daydreaming strategy involving the free flow of thought, by investigating the neural correlates of the two strategies via continuous magnetoencephalographic (MEG) activity. We observed greater activity during mental contrasting (but not indulging) compared to resting in prefrontal, frontal, parietal, and temporal areas, indicating that mental contrasting involves strong intention formation, working memory, and episodic memory. In addition, heightened activity of occipital areas was observed during mental contrasting compared to resting and indulging, suggesting that mental contrasting, more than indulging and resting, entails purposefully creating mental images. Taken together, these findings indicate that mental contrasting is indeed a purposeful problemsolving strategy based on past performance history, whereas indulging is a purposeless daydreaming strategy that is oblivious to past experiences.eng
dc.description.versionpublished
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfdeu
dc.identifier.ppn310471001deu
dc.identifier.urihttp://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/10372
dc.language.isoengdeu
dc.legacy.dateIssued2009deu
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.0 Generic
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/
dc.subject.ddc150deu
dc.titleStrategies of intention formation are reflected in continuous MEG activityeng
dc.typePREPRINTdeu
dspace.entity.typePublication
kops.citation.bibtex
@unpublished{Achtziger2008Strat-10372,
  year={2008},
  title={Strategies of intention formation are reflected in continuous MEG activity},
  author={Achtziger, Anja and Fehr, Thorsten and Oettingen, Gabriele and Gollwitzer, Peter M. and Rockstroh, Brigitte},
  note={Published version in: Social Neuroscience 4 (2008), 1, pp. 11-27}
}
kops.citation.iso690ACHTZIGER, Anja, Thorsten FEHR, Gabriele OETTINGEN, Peter M. GOLLWITZER, Brigitte ROCKSTROH, 2008. Strategies of intention formation are reflected in continuous MEG activitydeu
kops.citation.iso690ACHTZIGER, Anja, Thorsten FEHR, Gabriele OETTINGEN, Peter M. GOLLWITZER, Brigitte ROCKSTROH, 2008. Strategies of intention formation are reflected in continuous MEG activityeng
kops.citation.rdf
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/10372">
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Self-regulation of intention formation is pivotal for achieving behavior change. Fantasy realization theory (Oettingen, 2000) assumes that mentally contrasting a desired positive future with present negative reality turns high expectations of success into strong intentions to realize the desired future, while indulging in the positive future fails to do so. The present study tests the theory s process assumption that mental contrasting is a cognitively demanding, purposeful problem-solving strategy involving working and episodic memory, whereas indulging is a mindless daydreaming strategy involving the free flow of thought, by investigating the neural correlates of the two strategies via continuous magnetoencephalographic (MEG) activity. We observed greater activity during mental contrasting (but not indulging) compared to resting in prefrontal, frontal, parietal, and temporal areas, indicating that mental contrasting involves strong intention formation, working memory, and episodic memory. In addition, heightened activity of occipital areas was observed during mental contrasting compared to resting and indulging, suggesting that mental contrasting, more than indulging and resting, entails purposefully creating mental images. Taken together, these findings indicate that mental contrasting is indeed a purposeful problemsolving strategy based on past performance history, whereas indulging is a purposeless daydreaming strategy that is oblivious to past experiences.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dc:contributor>Gollwitzer, Peter M.</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
    <dcterms:issued>2008</dcterms:issued>
    <dc:contributor>Rockstroh, Brigitte</dc:contributor>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/10372"/>
    <dc:contributor>Oettingen, Gabriele</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:title>Strategies of intention formation are reflected in continuous MEG activity</dcterms:title>
    <dc:contributor>Achtziger, Anja</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-03-25T09:16:26Z</dcterms:available>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/10372/1/Strategies_of_intention_formation.pdf"/>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/10372/1/Strategies_of_intention_formation.pdf"/>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-03-25T09:16:26Z</dc:date>
    <dc:creator>Oettingen, Gabriele</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/"/>
    <dc:creator>Fehr, Thorsten</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Fehr, Thorsten</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Gollwitzer, Peter M.</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Achtziger, Anja</dc:creator>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dc:creator>Rockstroh, Brigitte</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights>Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.0 Generic</dc:rights>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
kops.description.commentPublished version in: Social Neuroscience 4 (2008), 1, pp. 11-27eng
kops.description.openAccessopenaccessgreen
kops.flag.knbibliographytrue
kops.identifier.nbnurn:nbn:de:bsz:352-opus-63965deu
kops.opus.id6396deu
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationc34e861d-f502-4d23-8813-90d3ffbe1b6c
relation.isAuthorOfPublication2a3a6017-dc91-4f0c-b127-17991d6a4ee5
relation.isAuthorOfPublication76946d64-aa0b-4380-88ac-3f8d9e64fb0e
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryc34e861d-f502-4d23-8813-90d3ffbe1b6c

Dateien

Originalbündel

Gerade angezeigt 1 - 1 von 1
Vorschaubild nicht verfügbar
Name:
Strategies_of_intention_formation.pdf
Größe:
595.82 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Strategies_of_intention_formation.pdf
Strategies_of_intention_formation.pdfGröße: 595.82 KBDownloads: 1175