Publikation:

Strategies of intention formation are reflected in continuous MEG activity

Lade...
Vorschaubild

Dateien

Strategies_of_intention_formation.pdf
Strategies_of_intention_formation.pdfGröße: 595.82 KBDownloads: 1119

Datum

2008

Autor:innen

Herausgeber:innen

Kontakt

ISSN der Zeitschrift

Electronic ISSN

ISBN

Bibliografische Daten

Verlag

Schriftenreihe

Auflagebezeichnung

DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
ArXiv-ID

Internationale Patentnummer

Angaben zur Forschungsförderung

Projekt

Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Open Access Green
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz

Gesperrt bis

Titel in einer weiteren Sprache

Publikationstyp
Preprint
Publikationsstatus
Published

Erschienen in

Zusammenfassung

Self-regulation of intention formation is pivotal for achieving behavior change. Fantasy realization theory (Oettingen, 2000) assumes that mentally contrasting a desired positive future with present negative reality turns high expectations of success into strong intentions to realize the desired future, while indulging in the positive future fails to do so. The present study tests the theory s process assumption that mental contrasting is a cognitively demanding, purposeful problem-solving strategy involving working and episodic memory, whereas indulging is a mindless daydreaming strategy involving the free flow of thought, by investigating the neural correlates of the two strategies via continuous magnetoencephalographic (MEG) activity. We observed greater activity during mental contrasting (but not indulging) compared to resting in prefrontal, frontal, parietal, and temporal areas, indicating that mental contrasting involves strong intention formation, working memory, and episodic memory. In addition, heightened activity of occipital areas was observed during mental contrasting compared to resting and indulging, suggesting that mental contrasting, more than indulging and resting, entails purposefully creating mental images. Taken together, these findings indicate that mental contrasting is indeed a purposeful problemsolving strategy based on past performance history, whereas indulging is a purposeless daydreaming strategy that is oblivious to past experiences.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache

Fachgebiet (DDC)
150 Psychologie

Schlagwörter

Konferenz

Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined

Forschungsvorhaben

Organisationseinheiten

Zeitschriftenheft

Zugehörige Datensätze in KOPS

Zitieren

ISO 690ACHTZIGER, Anja, Thorsten FEHR, Gabriele OETTINGEN, Peter M. GOLLWITZER, Brigitte ROCKSTROH, 2008. Strategies of intention formation are reflected in continuous MEG activity
BibTex
@unpublished{Achtziger2008Strat-10372,
  year={2008},
  title={Strategies of intention formation are reflected in continuous MEG activity},
  author={Achtziger, Anja and Fehr, Thorsten and Oettingen, Gabriele and Gollwitzer, Peter M. and Rockstroh, Brigitte},
  note={Published version in: Social Neuroscience 4 (2008), 1, pp. 11-27}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/10372">
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Self-regulation of intention formation is pivotal for achieving behavior change. Fantasy realization theory (Oettingen, 2000) assumes that mentally contrasting a desired positive future with present negative reality turns high expectations of success into strong intentions to realize the desired future, while indulging in the positive future fails to do so. The present study tests the theory s process assumption that mental contrasting is a cognitively demanding, purposeful problem-solving strategy involving working and episodic memory, whereas indulging is a mindless daydreaming strategy involving the free flow of thought, by investigating the neural correlates of the two strategies via continuous magnetoencephalographic (MEG) activity. We observed greater activity during mental contrasting (but not indulging) compared to resting in prefrontal, frontal, parietal, and temporal areas, indicating that mental contrasting involves strong intention formation, working memory, and episodic memory. In addition, heightened activity of occipital areas was observed during mental contrasting compared to resting and indulging, suggesting that mental contrasting, more than indulging and resting, entails purposefully creating mental images. Taken together, these findings indicate that mental contrasting is indeed a purposeful problemsolving strategy based on past performance history, whereas indulging is a purposeless daydreaming strategy that is oblivious to past experiences.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dc:contributor>Gollwitzer, Peter M.</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
    <dcterms:issued>2008</dcterms:issued>
    <dc:contributor>Rockstroh, Brigitte</dc:contributor>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/10372"/>
    <dc:contributor>Oettingen, Gabriele</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:title>Strategies of intention formation are reflected in continuous MEG activity</dcterms:title>
    <dc:contributor>Achtziger, Anja</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-03-25T09:16:26Z</dcterms:available>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/10372/1/Strategies_of_intention_formation.pdf"/>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/10372/1/Strategies_of_intention_formation.pdf"/>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-03-25T09:16:26Z</dc:date>
    <dc:creator>Oettingen, Gabriele</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/"/>
    <dc:creator>Fehr, Thorsten</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Fehr, Thorsten</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Gollwitzer, Peter M.</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Achtziger, Anja</dc:creator>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dc:creator>Rockstroh, Brigitte</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights>Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.0 Generic</dc:rights>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Interner Vermerk

xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter

Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.

Prüfdatum der URL

Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation

Finanzierungsart

Kommentar zur Publikation

Published version in: Social Neuroscience 4 (2008), 1, pp. 11-27
Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Ja
Begutachtet
Diese Publikation teilen