Implementing ECtHR Judgments in So-Called "Multipolar Fundamental Rights Situations"

Breuer, Marten

Implementing ECtHR Judgments in So-Called "Multipolar Fundamental Rights Situations"

Dateien

Breuer_2-1tnff6k5w7c5m5.pdfGröße: 373.94 KBDownloads: 30

Datum

2017

Autor:innen

Breuer, Marten

URI (zitierfähiger Link)

http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:352-2-1tnff6k5w7c5m5

Open Access-Veröffentlichung

Open Access Green

Sammlungen

Rechtswissenschaft

Publikationstyp

Zeitschriftenartikel

Publikationsstatus

Published

Erschienen in

Journal of Siberian Federal University : Humanities & Social Sciences. 2017, 10(6), pp. 851-858. ISSN 1997-1370. eISSN 2313-6014

Zusammenfassung

The implementation of ECtHR judgments may be particularly difficult in cases where the concerns of two or more private litigants must be weighed against each other. The Strasbourg proceedings are unilateral in that only one of them (the party having lost the case at the national level) will be directly represented. If the ECtHR finds in favour of this party, implementing the judgment might raise fundamental rights concerns of the party previously having won the case before German courts. The article analyses the approach taken by the German Federal Constitutional Court, in particular in its famous Görgülü decision. It also evaluates the relevance of the “multipolar fundamental rights” argument in the jurisprudence of German courts.

Fachgebiet (DDC)

340 Recht

Zitieren

ISO 690

BREUER, Marten, 2017. Implementing ECtHR Judgments in So-Called "Multipolar Fundamental Rights Situations". In: Journal of Siberian Federal University : Humanities & Social Sciences. 2017, 10(6), pp. 851-858. ISSN 1997-1370. eISSN 2313-6014

BibTex

@article{Breuer2017Imple-39937,
  year={2017},
  title={Implementing ECtHR Judgments in So-Called "Multipolar Fundamental Rights Situations"},
  url={http://elib.sfu-kras.ru/handle/2311/33309},
  number={6},
  volume={10},
  issn={1997-1370},
  journal={Journal of Siberian Federal University : Humanities & Social Sciences},
  pages={851--858},
  author={Breuer, Marten}
}

RDF

<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/39937">
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2017-08-23T10:58:42Z</dc:date>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">The implementation of ECtHR judgments may be particularly difficult in cases where the concerns of two or more private litigants must be weighed against each other. The Strasbourg proceedings are unilateral in that only one of them (the party having lost the case at the national level) will be directly represented. If the ECtHR finds in favour of this party, implementing the judgment might raise fundamental rights concerns of the party previously having won the case before German courts. The article analyses the approach taken by the German Federal Constitutional Court, in particular in its famous Görgülü decision. It also evaluates the relevance of the “multipolar fundamental rights” argument in the jurisprudence of German courts.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2017-08-23T10:58:42Z</dcterms:available>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dc:creator>Breuer, Marten</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Breuer, Marten</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/39937/1/Breuer_2-1tnff6k5w7c5m5.pdf"/>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/39937/1/Breuer_2-1tnff6k5w7c5m5.pdf"/>
    <dcterms:issued>2017</dcterms:issued>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/44"/>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/39937"/>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/44"/>
    <dcterms:title>Implementing ECtHR Judgments in So-Called "Multipolar Fundamental Rights Situations"</dcterms:title>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

URL der Originalveröffentl.

http://elib.sfu-kras.ru/handle/2311/33309

Prüfdatum der URL

2017-08-23

Universitätsbibliographie

Ja