Publikation:

Implementing ECtHR Judgments in So-Called "Multipolar Fundamental Rights Situations"

Lade...
Vorschaubild

Dateien

Breuer_2-1tnff6k5w7c5m5.pdf
Breuer_2-1tnff6k5w7c5m5.pdfGröße: 373.94 KBDownloads: 46

Datum

2017

Autor:innen

Herausgeber:innen

Kontakt

ISSN der Zeitschrift

Electronic ISSN

ISBN

Bibliografische Daten

Verlag

Schriftenreihe

Auflagebezeichnung

DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
ArXiv-ID

Internationale Patentnummer

Link zur Lizenz
oops

Angaben zur Forschungsförderung

Projekt

Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Open Access Green
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz

Gesperrt bis

Titel in einer weiteren Sprache

Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published

Erschienen in

Journal of Siberian Federal University : Humanities & Social Sciences. 2017, 10(6), pp. 851-858. ISSN 1997-1370. eISSN 2313-6014

Zusammenfassung

The implementation of ECtHR judgments may be particularly difficult in cases where the concerns of two or more private litigants must be weighed against each other. The Strasbourg proceedings are unilateral in that only one of them (the party having lost the case at the national level) will be directly represented. If the ECtHR finds in favour of this party, implementing the judgment might raise fundamental rights concerns of the party previously having won the case before German courts. The article analyses the approach taken by the German Federal Constitutional Court, in particular in its famous Görgülü decision. It also evaluates the relevance of the “multipolar fundamental rights” argument in the jurisprudence of German courts.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache

Fachgebiet (DDC)
340 Recht

Schlagwörter

Konferenz

Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined

Forschungsvorhaben

Organisationseinheiten

Zeitschriftenheft

Zugehörige Datensätze in KOPS

Zitieren

ISO 690BREUER, Marten, 2017. Implementing ECtHR Judgments in So-Called "Multipolar Fundamental Rights Situations". In: Journal of Siberian Federal University : Humanities & Social Sciences. 2017, 10(6), pp. 851-858. ISSN 1997-1370. eISSN 2313-6014
BibTex
@article{Breuer2017Imple-39937,
  year={2017},
  title={Implementing ECtHR Judgments in So-Called "Multipolar Fundamental Rights Situations"},
  url={http://elib.sfu-kras.ru/handle/2311/33309},
  number={6},
  volume={10},
  issn={1997-1370},
  journal={Journal of Siberian Federal University : Humanities & Social Sciences},
  pages={851--858},
  author={Breuer, Marten}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/39937">
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2017-08-23T10:58:42Z</dc:date>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">The implementation of ECtHR judgments may be particularly difficult in cases where the concerns of two or more private litigants must be weighed against each other. The Strasbourg proceedings are unilateral in that only one of them (the party having lost the case at the national level) will be directly represented. If the ECtHR finds in favour of this party, implementing the judgment might raise fundamental rights concerns of the party previously having won the case before German courts. The article analyses the approach taken by the German Federal Constitutional Court, in particular in its famous Görgülü decision. It also evaluates the relevance of the “multipolar fundamental rights” argument in the jurisprudence of German courts.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2017-08-23T10:58:42Z</dcterms:available>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dc:creator>Breuer, Marten</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Breuer, Marten</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/39937/1/Breuer_2-1tnff6k5w7c5m5.pdf"/>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/39937/1/Breuer_2-1tnff6k5w7c5m5.pdf"/>
    <dcterms:issued>2017</dcterms:issued>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/44"/>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/39937"/>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/44"/>
    <dcterms:title>Implementing ECtHR Judgments in So-Called "Multipolar Fundamental Rights Situations"</dcterms:title>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Interner Vermerk

xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter

Kontakt

Prüfdatum der URL

2017-08-23

Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation

Finanzierungsart

Kommentar zur Publikation

Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Ja
Begutachtet
Diese Publikation teilen