Love is blind : Partisanship and perception of negative campaign messages in a multiparty system

dc.contributor.authorHaselmayer, Martin
dc.contributor.authorHirsch, Lisa
dc.contributor.authorJenny, Marcelo
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-08T11:46:47Z
dc.date.available2021-09-08T11:46:47Z
dc.date.issued2020-08-25eng
dc.description.abstractWe study how partisanship influences the perception of directed campaign statements of varying polarity and sentiment strength. Using a crowdsourced survey experiment with German participants, we find asymmetrical perceptual biases. Partisan respondents perceive negative campaigning from or about a party they favour, as less negative than non-partisans. The discounting effect applies particularly for voters with stronger preferences and for messages that are more strongly negative. Partisan preferences only weakly influence the perception of neutral or positive campaign statements. The discounting biases found for negative statements point at limits of negative campaigning effects in electoral contests. Different effects for weakly and strongly worded messages substantiate concerns that dichotomous approaches to negative campaigning could miss important variation in party communication and its effects.eng
dc.description.versionpublishedeng
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/2474736X.2020.1806002eng
dc.identifier.ppn1769696318
dc.identifier.urihttps://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/54831
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectNegative campaigning, party competition, partisanship, perceptual bias, survey experimenteng
dc.subject.ddc320eng
dc.titleLove is blind : Partisanship and perception of negative campaign messages in a multiparty systemeng
dc.typeJOURNAL_ARTICLEeng
dspace.entity.typePublication
kops.citation.bibtex
@article{Haselmayer2020-08-25blind-54831,
  year={2020},
  doi={10.1080/2474736X.2020.1806002},
  title={Love is blind : Partisanship and perception of negative campaign messages in a multiparty system},
  number={1},
  volume={2},
  journal={Political Research Exchange (PRX)},
  author={Haselmayer, Martin and Hirsch, Lisa and Jenny, Marcelo},
  note={Article Number: 1806002}
}
kops.citation.iso690HASELMAYER, Martin, Lisa HIRSCH, Marcelo JENNY, 2020. Love is blind : Partisanship and perception of negative campaign messages in a multiparty system. In: Political Research Exchange (PRX). Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. 2020, 2(1), 1806002. eISSN 2474-736X. Available under: doi: 10.1080/2474736X.2020.1806002deu
kops.citation.iso690HASELMAYER, Martin, Lisa HIRSCH, Marcelo JENNY, 2020. Love is blind : Partisanship and perception of negative campaign messages in a multiparty system. In: Political Research Exchange (PRX). Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. 2020, 2(1), 1806002. eISSN 2474-736X. Available under: doi: 10.1080/2474736X.2020.1806002eng
kops.citation.rdf
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/54831">
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
    <dc:creator>Haselmayer, Martin</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Hirsch, Lisa</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Jenny, Marcelo</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Jenny, Marcelo</dc:contributor>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/54831/3/Haselmayer_2-1p8debiz8l1dd2.pdf"/>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/54831/3/Haselmayer_2-1p8debiz8l1dd2.pdf"/>
    <dcterms:title>Love is blind : Partisanship and perception of negative campaign messages in a multiparty system</dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"/>
    <dc:rights>Attribution 4.0 International</dc:rights>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-09-08T11:46:47Z</dc:date>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-09-08T11:46:47Z</dcterms:available>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
    <dc:contributor>Haselmayer, Martin</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Hirsch, Lisa</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:issued>2020-08-25</dcterms:issued>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/54831"/>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">We study how partisanship influences the perception of directed campaign statements of varying polarity and sentiment strength. Using a crowdsourced survey experiment with German participants, we find asymmetrical perceptual biases. Partisan respondents perceive negative campaigning from or about a party they favour, as less negative than non-partisans. The discounting effect applies particularly for voters with stronger preferences and for messages that are more strongly negative. Partisan preferences only weakly influence the perception of neutral or positive campaign statements. The discounting biases found for negative statements point at limits of negative campaigning effects in electoral contests. Different effects for weakly and strongly worded messages substantiate concerns that dichotomous approaches to negative campaigning could miss important variation in party communication and its effects.</dcterms:abstract>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
kops.description.openAccessopenaccessgoldeng
kops.flag.isPeerReviewedunknowneng
kops.flag.knbibliographyfalse
kops.identifier.nbnurn:nbn:de:bsz:352-2-1p8debiz8l1dd2
kops.sourcefieldPolitical Research Exchange (PRX). Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. 2020, <b>2</b>(1), 1806002. eISSN 2474-736X. Available under: doi: 10.1080/2474736X.2020.1806002deu
kops.sourcefield.plainPolitical Research Exchange (PRX). Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. 2020, 2(1), 1806002. eISSN 2474-736X. Available under: doi: 10.1080/2474736X.2020.1806002deu
kops.sourcefield.plainPolitical Research Exchange (PRX). Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. 2020, 2(1), 1806002. eISSN 2474-736X. Available under: doi: 10.1080/2474736X.2020.1806002eng
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationf6db05f5-0a4a-489b-aea2-e757d735fb5b
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryf6db05f5-0a4a-489b-aea2-e757d735fb5b
source.bibliographicInfo.articleNumber1806002eng
source.bibliographicInfo.issue1eng
source.bibliographicInfo.volume2eng
source.identifier.eissn2474-736Xeng
source.periodicalTitlePolitical Research Exchange (PRX)eng
source.publisherRoutledge, Taylor & Francis Groupeng

Dateien

Originalbündel

Gerade angezeigt 1 - 1 von 1
Vorschaubild nicht verfügbar
Name:
Haselmayer_2-1p8debiz8l1dd2.pdf
Größe:
2.34 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Beschreibung:
Haselmayer_2-1p8debiz8l1dd2.pdf
Haselmayer_2-1p8debiz8l1dd2.pdfGröße: 2.34 MBDownloads: 334

Lizenzbündel

Gerade angezeigt 1 - 1 von 1
Vorschaubild nicht verfügbar
Name:
license.txt
Größe:
3.96 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Beschreibung:
license.txt
license.txtGröße: 3.96 KBDownloads: 0