Exploring the Structure of Teachers' Emotional Labor in the Classroom : A Multitrait-Multimethod Analysis
| dc.contributor.author | Wang, Hui | |
| dc.contributor.author | Hall, Nathan C. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Chiu, Ming Ming | |
| dc.contributor.author | Götz, Thomas | |
| dc.contributor.author | Gogol, Katarzyna | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2020-07-01T11:38:22Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2020-07-01T11:38:22Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2020-09 | |
| dc.description.abstract | This study tests whether teachers’ emotional labor in classroom settings is optimally conceptualized according to the type of emotional labor strategy involved (genuinely expressing, hiding, and faking emotions), the specific type of emotion being performed in class (e.g., enjoyment vs. pride vs. anxiety), or both strategy type and emotion type. Multitrait–multimethod analyses of 1,086 Canadian teachers’ survey responses showed teachers’ responses to emotional labor items to be most reliably differentiated according to both specific types of emotional labor strategies as well as the valence of the emotion being performed. Findings were largely consistent with common “display rules” encouraging expression of positive emotions and hiding of negative emotions by teachers in classroom settings. Results further showed teachers’ emotional labor strategies for negative emotions to be particularly contingent on the specific discrete emotion involved, highlighting the complexity of expressing negative emotions as a behavior management strategy. | eng |
| dc.description.version | published | de |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/emip.12353 | eng |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/50086 | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | eng |
| dc.subject.ddc | 370 | eng |
| dc.title | Exploring the Structure of Teachers' Emotional Labor in the Classroom : A Multitrait-Multimethod Analysis | eng |
| dc.type | JOURNAL_ARTICLE | de |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| kops.citation.bibtex | @article{Wang2020-09Explo-50086,
year={2020},
doi={10.1111/emip.12353},
title={Exploring the Structure of Teachers' Emotional Labor in the Classroom : A Multitrait-Multimethod Analysis},
number={3},
volume={39},
issn={0731-1745},
journal={Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice},
pages={122--134},
author={Wang, Hui and Hall, Nathan C. and Chiu, Ming Ming and Götz, Thomas and Gogol, Katarzyna}
} | |
| kops.citation.iso690 | WANG, Hui, Nathan C. HALL, Ming Ming CHIU, Thomas GÖTZ, Katarzyna GOGOL, 2020. Exploring the Structure of Teachers' Emotional Labor in the Classroom : A Multitrait-Multimethod Analysis. In: Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice. Wiley. 2020, 39(3), pp. 122-134. ISSN 0731-1745. eISSN 1745-3992. Available under: doi: 10.1111/emip.12353 | deu |
| kops.citation.iso690 | WANG, Hui, Nathan C. HALL, Ming Ming CHIU, Thomas GÖTZ, Katarzyna GOGOL, 2020. Exploring the Structure of Teachers' Emotional Labor in the Classroom : A Multitrait-Multimethod Analysis. In: Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice. Wiley. 2020, 39(3), pp. 122-134. ISSN 0731-1745. eISSN 1745-3992. Available under: doi: 10.1111/emip.12353 | eng |
| kops.citation.rdf | <rdf:RDF
xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" >
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/50086">
<dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">This study tests whether teachers’ emotional labor in classroom settings is optimally conceptualized according to the type of emotional labor strategy involved (genuinely expressing, hiding, and faking emotions), the specific type of emotion being performed in class (e.g., enjoyment vs. pride vs. anxiety), or both strategy type and emotion type. Multitrait–multimethod analyses of 1,086 Canadian teachers’ survey responses showed teachers’ responses to emotional labor items to be most reliably differentiated according to both specific types of emotional labor strategies as well as the valence of the emotion being performed. Findings were largely consistent with common “display rules” encouraging expression of positive emotions and hiding of negative emotions by teachers in classroom settings. Results further showed teachers’ emotional labor strategies for negative emotions to be particularly contingent on the specific discrete emotion involved, highlighting the complexity of expressing negative emotions as a behavior management strategy.</dcterms:abstract>
<dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/31"/>
<dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2020-07-01T11:38:22Z</dc:date>
<dcterms:title>Exploring the Structure of Teachers' Emotional Labor in the Classroom : A Multitrait-Multimethod Analysis</dcterms:title>
<foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
<void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
<bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/50086"/>
<dc:contributor>Chiu, Ming Ming</dc:contributor>
<dc:contributor>Gogol, Katarzyna</dc:contributor>
<dc:creator>Götz, Thomas</dc:creator>
<dcterms:issued>2020-09</dcterms:issued>
<dc:creator>Hall, Nathan C.</dc:creator>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dc:creator>Wang, Hui</dc:creator>
<dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/31"/>
<dc:creator>Gogol, Katarzyna</dc:creator>
<dc:contributor>Hall, Nathan C.</dc:contributor>
<dc:contributor>Götz, Thomas</dc:contributor>
<dc:creator>Chiu, Ming Ming</dc:creator>
<dc:contributor>Wang, Hui</dc:contributor>
<dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2020-07-01T11:38:22Z</dcterms:available>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF> | |
| kops.flag.isPeerReviewed | unknown | eng |
| kops.flag.knbibliography | true | |
| kops.sourcefield | Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice. Wiley. 2020, <b>39</b>(3), pp. 122-134. ISSN 0731-1745. eISSN 1745-3992. Available under: doi: 10.1111/emip.12353 | deu |
| kops.sourcefield.plain | Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice. Wiley. 2020, 39(3), pp. 122-134. ISSN 0731-1745. eISSN 1745-3992. Available under: doi: 10.1111/emip.12353 | deu |
| kops.sourcefield.plain | Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice. Wiley. 2020, 39(3), pp. 122-134. ISSN 0731-1745. eISSN 1745-3992. Available under: doi: 10.1111/emip.12353 | eng |
| relation.isAuthorOfPublication | a074ce8c-d9d1-440a-8642-1bcc7871d6bc | |
| relation.isAuthorOfPublication | 559d937a-bb08-4f18-9189-62936b7abde3 | |
| relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | a074ce8c-d9d1-440a-8642-1bcc7871d6bc | |
| source.bibliographicInfo.fromPage | 122 | |
| source.bibliographicInfo.issue | 3 | |
| source.bibliographicInfo.toPage | 134 | |
| source.bibliographicInfo.volume | 39 | |
| source.identifier.eissn | 1745-3992 | eng |
| source.identifier.issn | 0731-1745 | eng |
| source.periodicalTitle | Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice | eng |
| source.publisher | Wiley | eng |