Exploring the Structure of Teachers' Emotional Labor in the Classroom : A Multitrait-Multimethod Analysis

dc.contributor.authorWang, Hui
dc.contributor.authorHall, Nathan C.
dc.contributor.authorChiu, Ming Ming
dc.contributor.authorGötz, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorGogol, Katarzyna
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-01T11:38:22Z
dc.date.available2020-07-01T11:38:22Z
dc.date.issued2020-09
dc.description.abstractThis study tests whether teachers’ emotional labor in classroom settings is optimally conceptualized according to the type of emotional labor strategy involved (genuinely expressing, hiding, and faking emotions), the specific type of emotion being performed in class (e.g., enjoyment vs. pride vs. anxiety), or both strategy type and emotion type. Multitrait–multimethod analyses of 1,086 Canadian teachers’ survey responses showed teachers’ responses to emotional labor items to be most reliably differentiated according to both specific types of emotional labor strategies as well as the valence of the emotion being performed. Findings were largely consistent with common “display rules” encouraging expression of positive emotions and hiding of negative emotions by teachers in classroom settings. Results further showed teachers’ emotional labor strategies for negative emotions to be particularly contingent on the specific discrete emotion involved, highlighting the complexity of expressing negative emotions as a behavior management strategy.eng
dc.description.versionpublishedde
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/emip.12353eng
dc.identifier.urihttps://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/50086
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.subject.ddc370eng
dc.titleExploring the Structure of Teachers' Emotional Labor in the Classroom : A Multitrait-Multimethod Analysiseng
dc.typeJOURNAL_ARTICLEde
dspace.entity.typePublication
kops.citation.bibtex
@article{Wang2020-09Explo-50086,
  year={2020},
  doi={10.1111/emip.12353},
  title={Exploring the Structure of Teachers' Emotional Labor in the Classroom : A Multitrait-Multimethod Analysis},
  number={3},
  volume={39},
  issn={0731-1745},
  journal={Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice},
  pages={122--134},
  author={Wang, Hui and Hall, Nathan C. and Chiu, Ming Ming and Götz, Thomas and Gogol, Katarzyna}
}
kops.citation.iso690WANG, Hui, Nathan C. HALL, Ming Ming CHIU, Thomas GÖTZ, Katarzyna GOGOL, 2020. Exploring the Structure of Teachers' Emotional Labor in the Classroom : A Multitrait-Multimethod Analysis. In: Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice. Wiley. 2020, 39(3), pp. 122-134. ISSN 0731-1745. eISSN 1745-3992. Available under: doi: 10.1111/emip.12353deu
kops.citation.iso690WANG, Hui, Nathan C. HALL, Ming Ming CHIU, Thomas GÖTZ, Katarzyna GOGOL, 2020. Exploring the Structure of Teachers' Emotional Labor in the Classroom : A Multitrait-Multimethod Analysis. In: Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice. Wiley. 2020, 39(3), pp. 122-134. ISSN 0731-1745. eISSN 1745-3992. Available under: doi: 10.1111/emip.12353eng
kops.citation.rdf
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/50086">
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">This study tests whether teachers’ emotional labor in classroom settings is optimally conceptualized according to the type of emotional labor strategy involved (genuinely expressing, hiding, and faking emotions), the specific type of emotion being performed in class (e.g., enjoyment vs. pride vs. anxiety), or both strategy type and emotion type. Multitrait–multimethod analyses of 1,086 Canadian teachers’ survey responses showed teachers’ responses to emotional labor items to be most reliably differentiated according to both specific types of emotional labor strategies as well as the valence of the emotion being performed. Findings were largely consistent with common “display rules” encouraging expression of positive emotions and hiding of negative emotions by teachers in classroom settings. Results further showed teachers’ emotional labor strategies for negative emotions to be particularly contingent on the specific discrete emotion involved, highlighting the complexity of expressing negative emotions as a behavior management strategy.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/31"/>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2020-07-01T11:38:22Z</dc:date>
    <dcterms:title>Exploring the Structure of Teachers' Emotional Labor in the Classroom : A Multitrait-Multimethod Analysis</dcterms:title>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/50086"/>
    <dc:contributor>Chiu, Ming Ming</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Gogol, Katarzyna</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Götz, Thomas</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:issued>2020-09</dcterms:issued>
    <dc:creator>Hall, Nathan C.</dc:creator>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dc:creator>Wang, Hui</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/31"/>
    <dc:creator>Gogol, Katarzyna</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Hall, Nathan C.</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Götz, Thomas</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Chiu, Ming Ming</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Wang, Hui</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2020-07-01T11:38:22Z</dcterms:available>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
kops.flag.isPeerReviewedunknowneng
kops.flag.knbibliographytrue
kops.sourcefieldEducational Measurement: Issues and Practice. Wiley. 2020, <b>39</b>(3), pp. 122-134. ISSN 0731-1745. eISSN 1745-3992. Available under: doi: 10.1111/emip.12353deu
kops.sourcefield.plainEducational Measurement: Issues and Practice. Wiley. 2020, 39(3), pp. 122-134. ISSN 0731-1745. eISSN 1745-3992. Available under: doi: 10.1111/emip.12353deu
kops.sourcefield.plainEducational Measurement: Issues and Practice. Wiley. 2020, 39(3), pp. 122-134. ISSN 0731-1745. eISSN 1745-3992. Available under: doi: 10.1111/emip.12353eng
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationa074ce8c-d9d1-440a-8642-1bcc7871d6bc
relation.isAuthorOfPublication559d937a-bb08-4f18-9189-62936b7abde3
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoverya074ce8c-d9d1-440a-8642-1bcc7871d6bc
source.bibliographicInfo.fromPage122
source.bibliographicInfo.issue3
source.bibliographicInfo.toPage134
source.bibliographicInfo.volume39
source.identifier.eissn1745-3992eng
source.identifier.issn0731-1745eng
source.periodicalTitleEducational Measurement: Issues and Practiceeng
source.publisherWileyeng

Dateien