Food for Thought : Green Toxicology

dc.contributor.authorMaertens, Alexandra
dc.contributor.authorAnastas, Nicholas
dc.contributor.authorSpencer, Pamela J.
dc.contributor.authorStephnes, Martin
dc.contributor.authorGoldberg, Alan
dc.contributor.authorHartung, Thomas
dc.date.accessioned2015-03-04T11:02:40Z
dc.date.available2015-03-04T11:02:40Z
dc.date.issued2014eng
dc.description.abstractHistorically, early identification and characterization of adverse effects of industrial chemicals was difficult because conventional toxicological test methods did not meet R&D needs for rapid, relatively inexpensive methods amenable to small amounts of test material. The pharmaceutical industry now front-loads toxicity testing, using in silico, in vitro, and less demanding animal tests at earlier stages of product development to identify and anticipate undesirable toxicological effects and optimize product development. The Green Chemistry movement embraces similar ideas for development of less toxic products, safer processes, and less waste and exposure. Further, the concept of benign design suggests ways to consider possible toxicities before the actual synthesis and to apply some structure/activity rules (SAR) and in silico methods. This requires not only scientific development but also a change in corporate culture in which synthetic chemists work with toxicologists. An emerging discipline called Green Toxicology (Anastas, 2012) provides a framework for integrating the principles of toxicology into the enterprise of designing safer chemicals, thereby minimizing potential toxicity as early in production as possible. Green Toxicology’s novel utility lies in driving innovation by moving safety considerations to the earliest stage in a chemical’s lifecycle, i.e., to molecular design. In principle, this field is no different than other subdisciplines of toxicology that endeavor to focus on a specific area – for example, clinical, environmental or forensic toxicology. We use the same principles and tools to evaluate an existing substance or to design a new one. The unique emphasis is in using 21st century toxicology tools as a preventative strategy to “design out” undesired human health and environmental effects, thereby increasing the likelihood of launching a successful, sustainable product. Starting with the formation of a steering group and a series of workshops, the Green Toxicology concept is currently spreading internationally and is being refined via an iterative process.eng
dc.description.versionpublished
dc.identifier.doi10.14573/altex.1406181eng
dc.identifier.ppn433123249
dc.identifier.urihttp://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/30152
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectGreen Toxicology, benign design, design out, product developmenteng
dc.subject.ddc570eng
dc.titleFood for Thought : Green Toxicologyeng
dc.typeJOURNAL_ARTICLEeng
dspace.entity.typePublication
kops.citation.bibtex
@article{Maertens2014Thoug-30152,
  year={2014},
  doi={10.14573/altex.1406181},
  title={Food for Thought : Green Toxicology},
  number={3},
  volume={31},
  issn={1868-596X},
  journal={Alternatives to Animal Experimentation : ALTEX},
  pages={243--249},
  author={Maertens, Alexandra and Anastas, Nicholas and Spencer, Pamela J. and Stephnes, Martin and Goldberg, Alan and Hartung, Thomas}
}
kops.citation.iso690MAERTENS, Alexandra, Nicholas ANASTAS, Pamela J. SPENCER, Martin STEPHNES, Alan GOLDBERG, Thomas HARTUNG, 2014. Food for Thought : Green Toxicology. In: Alternatives to Animal Experimentation : ALTEX. 2014, 31(3), pp. 243-249. ISSN 1868-596X. eISSN 1868-8551. Available under: doi: 10.14573/altex.1406181deu
kops.citation.iso690MAERTENS, Alexandra, Nicholas ANASTAS, Pamela J. SPENCER, Martin STEPHNES, Alan GOLDBERG, Thomas HARTUNG, 2014. Food for Thought : Green Toxicology. In: Alternatives to Animal Experimentation : ALTEX. 2014, 31(3), pp. 243-249. ISSN 1868-596X. eISSN 1868-8551. Available under: doi: 10.14573/altex.1406181eng
kops.citation.rdf
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/30152">
    <dc:creator>Goldberg, Alan</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2015-03-04T11:02:40Z</dcterms:available>
    <dc:contributor>Spencer, Pamela J.</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Hartung, Thomas</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Historically, early identification and characterization of adverse effects of industrial chemicals was difficult because conventional toxicological test methods did not meet R&amp;D needs for rapid, relatively inexpensive methods amenable to small amounts of test material. The pharmaceutical industry now front-loads toxicity testing, using in silico, in vitro, and less demanding animal tests at earlier stages of product development to identify and anticipate undesirable toxicological effects and optimize product development. The Green Chemistry movement embraces similar ideas for development of less toxic products, safer processes, and less waste and exposure. Further, the concept of benign design suggests ways to consider possible toxicities before the actual synthesis and to apply some structure/activity rules (SAR) and in silico methods. This requires not only scientific development but also a change in corporate culture in which synthetic chemists work with toxicologists. An emerging discipline called Green Toxicology (Anastas, 2012) provides a framework for integrating the principles of toxicology into the enterprise of designing safer chemicals, thereby minimizing potential toxicity as early in production as possible. Green Toxicology’s novel utility lies in driving innovation by moving safety considerations to the earliest stage in a chemical’s lifecycle, i.e., to molecular design. In principle, this field is no different than other subdisciplines of toxicology that endeavor to focus on a specific area – for example, clinical, environmental or forensic toxicology. We use the same principles and tools to evaluate an existing substance or to design a new one. The unique emphasis is in using 21st century toxicology tools as a preventative strategy to “design out” undesired human health and environmental effects, thereby increasing the likelihood of launching a successful, sustainable product. Starting with the formation of a steering group and a series of workshops, the Green Toxicology concept is currently spreading internationally and is being refined via an iterative process.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dc:contributor>Goldberg, Alan</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/30152/1/Maertens_0-265779.pdf"/>
    <dc:contributor>Maertens, Alexandra</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:issued>2014</dcterms:issued>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/28"/>
    <dc:creator>Anastas, Nicholas</dc:creator>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dc:creator>Spencer, Pamela J.</dc:creator>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/30152"/>
    <dc:creator>Stephnes, Martin</dc:creator>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2015-03-04T11:02:40Z</dc:date>
    <dc:contributor>Anastas, Nicholas</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Hartung, Thomas</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Maertens, Alexandra</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Stephnes, Martin</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/28"/>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/30152/1/Maertens_0-265779.pdf"/>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"/>
    <dcterms:title>Food for Thought : Green Toxicology</dcterms:title>
    <dc:rights>Attribution 4.0 International</dc:rights>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
kops.description.openAccessopenaccessgold
kops.description.openAccessopenaccessgold
kops.flag.knbibliographyfalse
kops.identifier.nbnurn:nbn:de:bsz:352-0-265779
kops.sourcefieldAlternatives to Animal Experimentation : ALTEX. 2014, <b>31</b>(3), pp. 243-249. ISSN 1868-596X. eISSN 1868-8551. Available under: doi: 10.14573/altex.1406181deu
kops.sourcefield.plainAlternatives to Animal Experimentation : ALTEX. 2014, 31(3), pp. 243-249. ISSN 1868-596X. eISSN 1868-8551. Available under: doi: 10.14573/altex.1406181deu
kops.sourcefield.plainAlternatives to Animal Experimentation : ALTEX. 2014, 31(3), pp. 243-249. ISSN 1868-596X. eISSN 1868-8551. Available under: doi: 10.14573/altex.1406181eng
relation.isAuthorOfPublication36e501e4-b8aa-46a8-9514-4a52792e3f9a
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery36e501e4-b8aa-46a8-9514-4a52792e3f9a
source.bibliographicInfo.fromPage243eng
source.bibliographicInfo.issue3eng
source.bibliographicInfo.toPage249eng
source.bibliographicInfo.volume31eng
source.identifier.eissn1868-8551eng
source.identifier.issn1868-596Xeng
source.periodicalTitleAlternatives to Animal Experimentation : ALTEXeng
temp.internal.duplicates<p>Keine Dubletten gefunden. Letzte Überprüfung: 08.12.2014 16:27:46</p>deu

Dateien

Originalbündel

Gerade angezeigt 1 - 1 von 1
Vorschaubild nicht verfügbar
Name:
Maertens_0-265779.pdf
Größe:
690.74 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Beschreibung:
Maertens_0-265779.pdf
Maertens_0-265779.pdfGröße: 690.74 KBDownloads: 554