Food for Thought : Green Toxicology
Dateien
Datum
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
URI (zitierfähiger Link)
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Link zur Lizenz
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Publikationsstatus
Erschienen in
Zusammenfassung
Historically, early identification and characterization of adverse effects of industrial chemicals was difficult because conventional toxicological test methods did not meet R&D needs for rapid, relatively inexpensive methods amenable to small amounts of test material. The pharmaceutical industry now front-loads toxicity testing, using in silico, in vitro, and less demanding animal tests at earlier stages of product development to identify and anticipate undesirable toxicological effects and optimize product development. The Green Chemistry movement embraces similar ideas for development of less toxic products, safer processes, and less waste and exposure. Further, the concept of benign design suggests ways to consider possible toxicities before the actual synthesis and to apply some structure/activity rules (SAR) and in silico methods. This requires not only scientific development but also a change in corporate culture in which synthetic chemists work with toxicologists. An emerging discipline called Green Toxicology (Anastas, 2012) provides a framework for integrating the principles of toxicology into the enterprise of designing safer chemicals, thereby minimizing potential toxicity as early in production as possible. Green Toxicology’s novel utility lies in driving innovation by moving safety considerations to the earliest stage in a chemical’s lifecycle, i.e., to molecular design. In principle, this field is no different than other subdisciplines of toxicology that endeavor to focus on a specific area – for example, clinical, environmental or forensic toxicology. We use the same principles and tools to evaluate an existing substance or to design a new one. The unique emphasis is in using 21st century toxicology tools as a preventative strategy to “design out” undesired human health and environmental effects, thereby increasing the likelihood of launching a successful, sustainable product. Starting with the formation of a steering group and a series of workshops, the Green Toxicology concept is currently spreading internationally and is being refined via an iterative process.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
Zitieren
ISO 690
MAERTENS, Alexandra, Nicholas ANASTAS, Pamela J. SPENCER, Martin STEPHNES, Alan GOLDBERG, Thomas HARTUNG, 2014. Food for Thought : Green Toxicology. In: Alternatives to Animal Experimentation : ALTEX. 2014, 31(3), pp. 243-249. ISSN 1868-596X. eISSN 1868-8551. Available under: doi: 10.14573/altex.1406181BibTex
@article{Maertens2014Thoug-30152, year={2014}, doi={10.14573/altex.1406181}, title={Food for Thought : Green Toxicology}, number={3}, volume={31}, issn={1868-596X}, journal={Alternatives to Animal Experimentation : ALTEX}, pages={243--249}, author={Maertens, Alexandra and Anastas, Nicholas and Spencer, Pamela J. and Stephnes, Martin and Goldberg, Alan and Hartung, Thomas} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/30152"> <dc:creator>Goldberg, Alan</dc:creator> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2015-03-04T11:02:40Z</dcterms:available> <dc:contributor>Spencer, Pamela J.</dc:contributor> <dc:creator>Hartung, Thomas</dc:creator> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Historically, early identification and characterization of adverse effects of industrial chemicals was difficult because conventional toxicological test methods did not meet R&D needs for rapid, relatively inexpensive methods amenable to small amounts of test material. The pharmaceutical industry now front-loads toxicity testing, using in silico, in vitro, and less demanding animal tests at earlier stages of product development to identify and anticipate undesirable toxicological effects and optimize product development. The Green Chemistry movement embraces similar ideas for development of less toxic products, safer processes, and less waste and exposure. Further, the concept of benign design suggests ways to consider possible toxicities before the actual synthesis and to apply some structure/activity rules (SAR) and in silico methods. This requires not only scientific development but also a change in corporate culture in which synthetic chemists work with toxicologists. An emerging discipline called Green Toxicology (Anastas, 2012) provides a framework for integrating the principles of toxicology into the enterprise of designing safer chemicals, thereby minimizing potential toxicity as early in production as possible. Green Toxicology’s novel utility lies in driving innovation by moving safety considerations to the earliest stage in a chemical’s lifecycle, i.e., to molecular design. In principle, this field is no different than other subdisciplines of toxicology that endeavor to focus on a specific area – for example, clinical, environmental or forensic toxicology. We use the same principles and tools to evaluate an existing substance or to design a new one. The unique emphasis is in using 21st century toxicology tools as a preventative strategy to “design out” undesired human health and environmental effects, thereby increasing the likelihood of launching a successful, sustainable product. Starting with the formation of a steering group and a series of workshops, the Green Toxicology concept is currently spreading internationally and is being refined via an iterative process.</dcterms:abstract> <dc:contributor>Goldberg, Alan</dc:contributor> <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/30152/1/Maertens_0-265779.pdf"/> <dc:contributor>Maertens, Alexandra</dc:contributor> <dcterms:issued>2014</dcterms:issued> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/28"/> <dc:creator>Anastas, Nicholas</dc:creator> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dc:creator>Spencer, Pamela J.</dc:creator> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/30152"/> <dc:creator>Stephnes, Martin</dc:creator> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2015-03-04T11:02:40Z</dc:date> <dc:contributor>Anastas, Nicholas</dc:contributor> <dc:contributor>Hartung, Thomas</dc:contributor> <dc:creator>Maertens, Alexandra</dc:creator> <dc:contributor>Stephnes, Martin</dc:contributor> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/28"/> <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/30152/1/Maertens_0-265779.pdf"/> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"/> <dcterms:title>Food for Thought : Green Toxicology</dcterms:title> <dc:rights>Attribution 4.0 International</dc:rights> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>