Bias in polar questions : Evidence from English and German production experiments

dc.contributor.authorDomaneschi, Filippo
dc.contributor.authorRomero, Maribel
dc.contributor.authorBraun, Bettina
dc.date.accessioned2018-04-24T13:28:42Z
dc.date.available2018-04-24T13:28:42Z
dc.date.issued2017-03-29eng
dc.description.abstractDifferent polar question forms (e.g., Do you / Do you not / Don’t you / Really? Do you... have a car?) are not equally appropriate in all situations. The present experiments investigate which combinations of original speaker belief and contextual evidence influence the choice of question type in English and German. Our results show that both kinds of bias interact: in both languages, positive polar questions are typically selected when there is no original speaker belief and positive or non-informative contextual evidence; low negation questions (Do you not...?) are most frequently chosen when no original belief meets negative contextual evidence; high negation questions (Don’t you...?) are prompted when positive original speaker belief is followed by negative or non-informative contextual evidence; positive questions with really are produced most frequently when a negative original bias is combined with positive contextual evidence. In string-identical forms, there are prosodic differences across crucial conditions.eng
dc.description.versionpublishedeng
dc.identifier.doi10.5334/gjgl.27eng
dc.identifier.ppn502333669
dc.identifier.urihttps://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/42160
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectpolar question; bias; negation; experimental pragmatics; prosodyeng
dc.subject.ddc400eng
dc.titleBias in polar questions : Evidence from English and German production experimentseng
dc.typeJOURNAL_ARTICLEeng
dspace.entity.typePublication
kops.citation.bibtex
@article{Domaneschi2017-03-29polar-42160,
  year={2017},
  doi={10.5334/gjgl.27},
  title={Bias in polar questions : Evidence from English and German production experiments},
  number={1},
  volume={2},
  journal={Glossa : A Journal of General Linguistics},
  author={Domaneschi, Filippo and Romero, Maribel and Braun, Bettina},
  note={Article Number: 26}
}
kops.citation.iso690DOMANESCHI, Filippo, Maribel ROMERO, Bettina BRAUN, 2017. Bias in polar questions : Evidence from English and German production experiments. In: Glossa : A Journal of General Linguistics. 2017, 2(1), 26. eISSN 2397-1835. Available under: doi: 10.5334/gjgl.27deu
kops.citation.iso690DOMANESCHI, Filippo, Maribel ROMERO, Bettina BRAUN, 2017. Bias in polar questions : Evidence from English and German production experiments. In: Glossa : A Journal of General Linguistics. 2017, 2(1), 26. eISSN 2397-1835. Available under: doi: 10.5334/gjgl.27eng
kops.citation.rdf
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42160">
    <dc:rights>Attribution 4.0 International</dc:rights>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2018-04-24T13:28:42Z</dc:date>
    <dc:contributor>Romero, Maribel</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Braun, Bettina</dc:creator>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/42160"/>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dc:creator>Domaneschi, Filippo</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Different polar question forms (e.g., Do you / Do you not / Don’t you / Really? Do you... have a car?) are not equally appropriate in all situations. The present experiments investigate which combinations of original speaker belief and contextual evidence influence the choice of question type in English and German. Our results show that both kinds of bias interact: in both languages, positive polar questions are typically selected when there is no original speaker belief and positive or non-informative contextual evidence; low negation questions (Do you not...?) are most frequently chosen when no original belief meets negative contextual evidence; high negation questions (Don’t you...?) are prompted when positive original speaker belief is followed by negative or non-informative contextual evidence; positive questions with really are produced most frequently when a negative original bias is combined with positive contextual evidence. In string-identical forms, there are prosodic differences across crucial conditions.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dcterms:issued>2017-03-29</dcterms:issued>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/45"/>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"/>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2018-04-24T13:28:42Z</dcterms:available>
    <dc:contributor>Domaneschi, Filippo</dc:contributor>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/45"/>
    <dcterms:title>Bias in polar questions : Evidence from English and German production experiments</dcterms:title>
    <dc:contributor>Braun, Bettina</dc:contributor>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/42160/1/Domaneschi_2-rup5xw50w2z25.pdf"/>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/42160/1/Domaneschi_2-rup5xw50w2z25.pdf"/>
    <dc:creator>Romero, Maribel</dc:creator>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
kops.description.openAccessopenaccessgoldeng
kops.flag.knbibliographytrue
kops.identifier.nbnurn:nbn:de:bsz:352-2-rup5xw50w2z25
kops.sourcefieldGlossa : A Journal of General Linguistics. 2017, <b>2</b>(1), 26. eISSN 2397-1835. Available under: doi: 10.5334/gjgl.27deu
kops.sourcefield.plainGlossa : A Journal of General Linguistics. 2017, 2(1), 26. eISSN 2397-1835. Available under: doi: 10.5334/gjgl.27deu
kops.sourcefield.plainGlossa : A Journal of General Linguistics. 2017, 2(1), 26. eISSN 2397-1835. Available under: doi: 10.5334/gjgl.27eng
relation.isAuthorOfPublication440da23c-5629-4ee2-b247-d2a90ed0c009
relation.isAuthorOfPublication0de0f7e4-e09d-4afb-ac8a-06ed6f3a05a4
relation.isAuthorOfPublicatione372682d-f849-4a24-954c-77ea5327008c
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery440da23c-5629-4ee2-b247-d2a90ed0c009
source.bibliographicInfo.articleNumber26eng
source.bibliographicInfo.issue1eng
source.bibliographicInfo.volume2eng
source.identifier.eissn2397-1835eng
source.periodicalTitleGlossa : A Journal of General Linguisticseng

Dateien

Originalbündel

Gerade angezeigt 1 - 1 von 1
Vorschaubild nicht verfügbar
Name:
Domaneschi_2-rup5xw50w2z25.pdf
Größe:
1.46 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Beschreibung:
Domaneschi_2-rup5xw50w2z25.pdf
Domaneschi_2-rup5xw50w2z25.pdfGröße: 1.46 MBDownloads: 1076

Lizenzbündel

Gerade angezeigt 1 - 1 von 1
Vorschaubild nicht verfügbar
Name:
license.txt
Größe:
3.88 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Beschreibung:
license.txt
license.txtGröße: 3.88 KBDownloads: 0