Publikation: Bias in polar questions : Evidence from English and German production experiments
Dateien
Datum
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
URI (zitierfähiger Link)
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Link zur Lizenz
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Publikationsstatus
Erschienen in
Zusammenfassung
Different polar question forms (e.g., Do you / Do you not / Don’t you / Really? Do you... have a car?) are not equally appropriate in all situations. The present experiments investigate which combinations of original speaker belief and contextual evidence influence the choice of question type in English and German. Our results show that both kinds of bias interact: in both languages, positive polar questions are typically selected when there is no original speaker belief and positive or non-informative contextual evidence; low negation questions (Do you not...?) are most frequently chosen when no original belief meets negative contextual evidence; high negation questions (Don’t you...?) are prompted when positive original speaker belief is followed by negative or non-informative contextual evidence; positive questions with really are produced most frequently when a negative original bias is combined with positive contextual evidence. In string-identical forms, there are prosodic differences across crucial conditions.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
Zitieren
ISO 690
DOMANESCHI, Filippo, Maribel ROMERO, Bettina BRAUN, 2017. Bias in polar questions : Evidence from English and German production experiments. In: Glossa : A Journal of General Linguistics. 2017, 2(1), 26. eISSN 2397-1835. Available under: doi: 10.5334/gjgl.27BibTex
@article{Domaneschi2017-03-29polar-42160, year={2017}, doi={10.5334/gjgl.27}, title={Bias in polar questions : Evidence from English and German production experiments}, number={1}, volume={2}, journal={Glossa : A Journal of General Linguistics}, author={Domaneschi, Filippo and Romero, Maribel and Braun, Bettina}, note={Article Number: 26} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42160"> <dc:rights>Attribution 4.0 International</dc:rights> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2018-04-24T13:28:42Z</dc:date> <dc:contributor>Romero, Maribel</dc:contributor> <dc:creator>Braun, Bettina</dc:creator> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/42160"/> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dc:creator>Domaneschi, Filippo</dc:creator> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Different polar question forms (e.g., Do you / Do you not / Don’t you / Really? Do you... have a car?) are not equally appropriate in all situations. The present experiments investigate which combinations of original speaker belief and contextual evidence influence the choice of question type in English and German. Our results show that both kinds of bias interact: in both languages, positive polar questions are typically selected when there is no original speaker belief and positive or non-informative contextual evidence; low negation questions (Do you not...?) are most frequently chosen when no original belief meets negative contextual evidence; high negation questions (Don’t you...?) are prompted when positive original speaker belief is followed by negative or non-informative contextual evidence; positive questions with really are produced most frequently when a negative original bias is combined with positive contextual evidence. In string-identical forms, there are prosodic differences across crucial conditions.</dcterms:abstract> <dcterms:issued>2017-03-29</dcterms:issued> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/45"/> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"/> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2018-04-24T13:28:42Z</dcterms:available> <dc:contributor>Domaneschi, Filippo</dc:contributor> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/45"/> <dcterms:title>Bias in polar questions : Evidence from English and German production experiments</dcterms:title> <dc:contributor>Braun, Bettina</dc:contributor> <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/42160/1/Domaneschi_2-rup5xw50w2z25.pdf"/> <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/42160/1/Domaneschi_2-rup5xw50w2z25.pdf"/> <dc:creator>Romero, Maribel</dc:creator> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>