Formal Representations of Suspended Judgment

Kurzanzeige
dc.contributor.authorZolfagharian, Ali
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-01T09:02:50Z
dc.date.available2020-10-01T09:02:50Z
dc.date.issued2020eng
dc.description.abstractThis work investigates various theories in Formal Epistemology in order to observe their capacity of distinguishing suspended judgment from ignorance. Besides, it suggests how every theory in formal epistemology could be changed and improved to represent suspended judgment properly. After an inquiry about the nature of suspended judgment and introducing its characteristics, I observe and suggest some improvement in various theories in formal epistemology namely AGM belief revision, Indeterministic belief revision, Bayesian Epistemology, Dempster Shafer theory of evidence, and Ranking Theory. The text also suggests a new theory, the Acceptance Revision, which can properly represent all doxastic attitudes namely belief, disbelief, suspended judgment and ignorance.eng
dc.description.versionpublishedeng
dc.identifier.ppn1734272139
dc.identifier.urihttps://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/51150
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.rightsterms-of-use
dc.rights.urihttps://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectRanking Theory, Endorsement Revision, Acceptance Revision, Formal Epistemology, Suspended Judgment, doxastic attitudes, Belief Revision, Bayesian Probability, Dempster Shafer Theory of Evidence, Knowledgeeng
dc.subject.ddc100eng
dc.titleFormal Representations of Suspended Judgmenteng
dc.typeDOCTORAL_THESISeng
dspace.entity.typePublication
kops.citation.bibtex
@phdthesis{Zolfagharian2020Forma-51150,
  year={2020},
  title={Formal Representations of Suspended Judgment},
  author={Zolfagharian, Ali},
  address={Konstanz},
  school={Universität Konstanz}
}
kops.citation.iso690ZOLFAGHARIAN, Ali, 2020. Formal Representations of Suspended Judgment [Dissertation]. Konstanz: University of Konstanzdeu
kops.citation.iso690ZOLFAGHARIAN, Ali, 2020. Formal Representations of Suspended Judgment [Dissertation]. Konstanz: University of Konstanzeng
kops.citation.rdf
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/51150">
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/>
    <dcterms:issued>2020</dcterms:issued>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/51150/3/Zolfagharian_2-gpnx2i068ae09.pdf"/>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/51150/3/Zolfagharian_2-gpnx2i068ae09.pdf"/>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">This work investigates various theories in Formal Epistemology in order to observe their capacity of distinguishing suspended judgment from ignorance. Besides, it suggests how every theory in formal epistemology could be changed and improved to represent suspended judgment properly. After an inquiry about the nature of suspended judgment and introducing its characteristics, I observe and suggest some improvement in various theories in formal epistemology namely AGM belief revision, Indeterministic belief revision, Bayesian Epistemology, Dempster Shafer theory of evidence, and Ranking Theory. The text also suggests a new theory, the Acceptance Revision, which can properly represent all doxastic attitudes namely belief, disbelief, suspended judgment and ignorance.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2020-10-01T09:02:50Z</dc:date>
    <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2020-10-01T09:02:50Z</dcterms:available>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/51150"/>
    <dcterms:title>Formal Representations of Suspended Judgment</dcterms:title>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dc:creator>Zolfagharian, Ali</dc:creator>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dc:contributor>Zolfagharian, Ali</dc:contributor>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
kops.date.examination2020-04-23eng
kops.date.yearDegreeGranted2020eng
kops.description.openAccessopenaccessgreen
kops.flag.knbibliographytrue
kops.identifier.nbnurn:nbn:de:bsz:352-2-gpnx2i068ae09
relation.isAuthorOfPublication1bd97459-71f4-43c5-ad65-ea9d7ef6918f
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery1bd97459-71f4-43c5-ad65-ea9d7ef6918f

Dateien

Originalbündel

Gerade angezeigt 1 - 1 von 1
Vorschaubild nicht verfügbar
Name:
Zolfagharian_2-gpnx2i068ae09.pdf
Größe:
2.33 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Beschreibung:
Zolfagharian_2-gpnx2i068ae09.pdf
Zolfagharian_2-gpnx2i068ae09.pdfGröße: 2.33 MBDownloads: 1603

Lizenzbündel

Gerade angezeigt 1 - 1 von 1
Vorschaubild nicht verfügbar
Name:
license.txt
Größe:
3.96 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Beschreibung:
license.txt
license.txtGröße: 3.96 KBDownloads: 0

Sammlungen

Philosophie: Publikationen