Do Teachers Consider Advice? : On the Acceptance of Computerized Expert Models

Kaufmann, Esther; Budescu, David V.

Do Teachers Consider Advice? : On the Acceptance of Computerized Expert Models

Dateien

Zu diesem Dokument gibt es keine Dateien.

Datum

2020

Autor:innen

Kaufmann, Esther

Budescu, David V.

DOI (zitierfähiger Link)

https://doi.org/10.1111/jedm.12251

Sammlungen

Psychologie

Publikationstyp

Zeitschriftenartikel

Publikationsstatus

Published

Erschienen in

Journal of Educational Measurement. Wiley-Blackwell - SSH. 2020, 57(2), pp. 311-342. ISSN 0022-0655. eISSN 1745-3984. Available under: doi: 10.1111/jedm.12251

Zusammenfassung

The literature suggests that simple expert (mathematical) models can improve the quality of decisions, but people are not always eager to accept and endorse such models. We ran three online experiments to test the receptiveness to advice from computerized expert models. Middle- and high-school teachers (N = 435) evaluated student profiles that varied in several personal and task relevant factors. They were offered (Studies I and II), or could ask for (Study III), advice from either expert models or human advisors. Overall, teachers requested and followed advice of expert models less frequently than advice from humans. Task-relevant factors (task difficulty) seem to be more salient than personal factors for teachers’ willingness to receive advice.

Fachgebiet (DDC)

150 Psychologie

Zitieren

ISO 690

KAUFMANN, Esther, David V. BUDESCU, 2020. Do Teachers Consider Advice? : On the Acceptance of Computerized Expert Models. In: Journal of Educational Measurement. Wiley-Blackwell - SSH. 2020, 57(2), pp. 311-342. ISSN 0022-0655. eISSN 1745-3984. Available under: doi: 10.1111/jedm.12251

BibTex

@article{Kaufmann2020Teach-55541,
  year={2020},
  doi={10.1111/jedm.12251},
  title={Do Teachers Consider Advice? : On the Acceptance of Computerized Expert Models},
  number={2},
  volume={57},
  issn={0022-0655},
  journal={Journal of Educational Measurement},
  pages={311--342},
  author={Kaufmann, Esther and Budescu, David V.}
}

RDF

<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/55541">
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-11-15T14:14:37Z</dcterms:available>
    <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/55541"/>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
    <dc:creator>Kaufmann, Esther</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Kaufmann, Esther</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Budescu, David V.</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Budescu, David V.</dc:contributor>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dcterms:title>Do Teachers Consider Advice? : On the Acceptance of Computerized Expert Models</dcterms:title>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-11-15T14:14:37Z</dc:date>
    <dcterms:issued>2020</dcterms:issued>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">The literature suggests that simple expert (mathematical) models can improve the quality of decisions, but people are not always eager to accept and endorse such models. We ran three online experiments to test the receptiveness to advice from computerized expert models. Middle- and high-school teachers (N = 435) evaluated student profiles that varied in several personal and task relevant factors. They were offered (Studies I and II), or could ask for (Study III), advice from either expert models or human advisors. Overall, teachers requested and followed advice of expert models less frequently than advice from humans. Task-relevant factors (task difficulty) seem to be more salient than personal factors for teachers’ willingness to receive advice.</dcterms:abstract>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Universitätsbibliographie

Ja

Begutachtet

Ja