Do Teachers Consider Advice? : On the Acceptance of Computerized Expert Models
Do Teachers Consider Advice? : On the Acceptance of Computerized Expert Models
No Thumbnail Available
Files
There are no files associated with this item.
Date
2020
Authors
Budescu, David V.
Editors
Journal ISSN
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliographical data
Publisher
Series
DOI (citable link)
International patent number
Link to the license
EU project number
Project
Open Access publication
Collections
Title in another language
Publication type
Journal article
Publication status
Published
Published in
Journal of Educational Measurement ; 57 (2020), 2. - pp. 311-342. - Wiley-Blackwell - SSH. - ISSN 0022-0655. - eISSN 1745-3984
Abstract
The literature suggests that simple expert (mathematical) models can improve the quality of decisions, but people are not always eager to accept and endorse such models. We ran three online experiments to test the receptiveness to advice from computerized expert models. Middle- and high-school teachers (N = 435) evaluated student profiles that varied in several personal and task relevant factors. They were offered (Studies I and II), or could ask for (Study III), advice from either expert models or human advisors. Overall, teachers requested and followed advice of expert models less frequently than advice from humans. Task-relevant factors (task difficulty) seem to be more salient than personal factors for teachers’ willingness to receive advice.
Summary in another language
Subject (DDC)
150 Psychology
Keywords
Conference
Review
undefined / . - undefined, undefined. - (undefined; undefined)
Cite This
ISO 690
KAUFMANN, Esther, David V. BUDESCU, 2020. Do Teachers Consider Advice? : On the Acceptance of Computerized Expert Models. In: Journal of Educational Measurement. Wiley-Blackwell - SSH. 57(2), pp. 311-342. ISSN 0022-0655. eISSN 1745-3984. Available under: doi: 10.1111/jedm.12251BibTex
@article{Kaufmann2020Teach-55541, year={2020}, doi={10.1111/jedm.12251}, title={Do Teachers Consider Advice? : On the Acceptance of Computerized Expert Models}, number={2}, volume={57}, issn={0022-0655}, journal={Journal of Educational Measurement}, pages={311--342}, author={Kaufmann, Esther and Budescu, David V.} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/55541"> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-11-15T14:14:37Z</dcterms:available> <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/55541"/> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/> <dc:creator>Kaufmann, Esther</dc:creator> <dc:contributor>Kaufmann, Esther</dc:contributor> <dc:creator>Budescu, David V.</dc:creator> <dc:contributor>Budescu, David V.</dc:contributor> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dcterms:title>Do Teachers Consider Advice? : On the Acceptance of Computerized Expert Models</dcterms:title> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-11-15T14:14:37Z</dc:date> <dcterms:issued>2020</dcterms:issued> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">The literature suggests that simple expert (mathematical) models can improve the quality of decisions, but people are not always eager to accept and endorse such models. We ran three online experiments to test the receptiveness to advice from computerized expert models. Middle- and high-school teachers (N = 435) evaluated student profiles that varied in several personal and task relevant factors. They were offered (Studies I and II), or could ask for (Study III), advice from either expert models or human advisors. Overall, teachers requested and followed advice of expert models less frequently than advice from humans. Task-relevant factors (task difficulty) seem to be more salient than personal factors for teachers’ willingness to receive advice.</dcterms:abstract> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>
Internal note
xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter
Examination date of dissertation
Method of financing
Comment on publication
Alliance license
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
International Co-Authors
Bibliography of Konstanz
Yes
Refereed
Yes