How differentiated integration shapes the constraining dissensus

Malang, Thomas; Schraff, Dominik

How differentiated integration shapes the constraining dissensus

Dateien

Zu diesem Dokument gibt es keine Dateien.

Datum

2024

Autor:innen

Malang, Thomas

Schraff, Dominik

DOI (zitierfähiger Link)

https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2023.2229377

Angaben zur Forschungsförderung

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG): 447624982

Sammlungen

Politik- und Verwaltungswissenschaft

Publikationstyp

Zeitschriftenartikel

Publikationsstatus

Published

Erschienen in

Journal of European Public Policy. Taylor & Francis. 2024, 31(9), S. 2878-2906. ISSN 1350-1763. eISSN 1466-4429. Verfügbar unter: doi: 10.1080/13501763.2023.2229377

Zusammenfassung

If European Union (EU) member states realise differentiations in EU Treaties, what effect do we see on public and political support for future integration? We argue on the basis of a two-tier integration theory and postfunctionalism that differentiations of member states do lead to a preference for slower future integration by its citizens and parties. Once citizens and parties are used to opting out, they demand more of the same in the future. We test our arguments with time-series cross-sectional data for 1994–2018 on all voluntary primary law opt-outs in the EU. Our panel matching estimates demonstrate that opt-outs decrease integration support. After a differentiation, parties become more Eurosceptic on average and publics express a lower preference for future integration. This suggests that differentiated integration is not a cure against Euroscepticism that leads to a unified EU in the future but rather reinforces two-tier integration.

Fachgebiet (DDC)

320 Politik

Schlagwörter

Differentiation, EU integration, postfunctionalism, responsiveness, panel data, public opinion

Zitieren

ISO 690

MALANG, Thomas, Dominik SCHRAFF, 2024. How differentiated integration shapes the constraining dissensus. In: Journal of European Public Policy. Taylor & Francis. 2024, 31(9), S. 2878-2906. ISSN 1350-1763. eISSN 1466-4429. Verfügbar unter: doi: 10.1080/13501763.2023.2229377

BibTex

@article{Malang2024-09diffe-67305,
  year={2024},
  doi={10.1080/13501763.2023.2229377},
  title={How differentiated integration shapes the constraining dissensus},
  number={9},
  volume={31},
  issn={1350-1763},
  journal={Journal of European Public Policy},
  pages={2878--2906},
  author={Malang, Thomas and Schraff, Dominik}
}

RDF

<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/67305">
    <dcterms:abstract>If European Union (EU) member states realise differentiations in EU Treaties, what effect do we see on public and political support for future integration? We argue on the basis of a two-tier integration theory and postfunctionalism that differentiations of member states do lead to a preference for slower future integration by its citizens and parties. Once citizens and parties are used to opting out, they demand more of the same in the future. We test our arguments with time-series cross-sectional data for 1994–2018 on all voluntary primary law opt-outs in the EU. Our panel matching estimates demonstrate that opt-outs decrease integration support. After a differentiation, parties become more Eurosceptic on average and publics express a lower preference for future integration. This suggests that differentiated integration is not a cure against Euroscepticism that leads to a unified EU in the future but rather reinforces two-tier integration.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dc:contributor>Schraff, Dominik</dc:contributor>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/67305"/>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2023-07-05T08:21:27Z</dc:date>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2023-07-05T08:21:27Z</dcterms:available>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dcterms:title>How differentiated integration shapes the constraining dissensus</dcterms:title>
    <dc:contributor>Malang, Thomas</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Schraff, Dominik</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
    <dc:creator>Malang, Thomas</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:issued>2024-09</dcterms:issued>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Universitätsbibliographie

Ja

Begutachtet

Ja