Ambivalent Freedom : Kant and the Problem of Willkür

No Thumbnail Available
Files
There are no files associated with this item.
Date
2021
Editors
Contact
Journal ISSN
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliographical data
Publisher
Series
URI (citable link)
ArXiv-ID
International patent number
Link to the license
EU project number
Project
Open Access publication
Collections
Restricted until
Title in another language
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Publication type
Contribution to a collection
Publication status
Published
Published in
Free Will : Historical and Analytic Perspectives / Hausmann, Marco; Noller, Jörg (ed.). - Cham : Palgrave Macmillan, 2021. - pp. 251-266. - ISBN 978-3-030-61135-4
Abstract
In this chapter, I will address the philosophical ambivalence of the concept of Willkür in and after Kant. The aim of my chapter is to defend it against the charge of irrationality and mere chance, and to rehabilitate it from a historical and analytic point of view. I will analyze Kant’s use of the word “Willkür” (power of choice), and chronologically follow the semantic and systematic changes in his philosophical work. Finally, I address recent attempts to revitalize the concept of Willkür in the analytic debate by referring to the work of Harry Frankfurt and Robert Kane. I shall argue that we need to distinguish between two kinds of libera arbitria. Whereas the liberum arbitrium indifferentiae can be interpreted in terms of the pejorative sense of “Willkür”—as mere chance—the liberum arbitrium voluntatis equals a reflective kind of Willkür—literal Will-kür (“choice”)—which involves freedom of the will.
Summary in another language
Subject (DDC)
100 Philosophy
Keywords
Willkür, Kant, Choice, Harry Frankfurt, Robert Kane, Liberum arbitrium
Conference
Review
undefined / . - undefined, undefined. - (undefined; undefined)
Cite This
ISO 690NOLLER, Jörg, 2021. Ambivalent Freedom : Kant and the Problem of Willkür. In: HAUSMANN, Marco, ed., Jörg NOLLER, ed.. Free Will : Historical and Analytic Perspectives. Cham:Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 251-266. ISBN 978-3-030-61135-4. Available under: doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-61136-1_11
BibTex
@incollection{Noller2021Ambiv-58252,
  year={2021},
  doi={10.1007/978-3-030-61136-1_11},
  title={Ambivalent Freedom : Kant and the Problem of Willkür},
  isbn={978-3-030-61135-4},
  publisher={Palgrave Macmillan},
  address={Cham},
  booktitle={Free Will : Historical and Analytic Perspectives},
  pages={251--266},
  editor={Hausmann, Marco and Noller, Jörg},
  author={Noller, Jörg}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/58252">
    <dcterms:issued>2021</dcterms:issued>
    <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="deu">In this chapter, I will address the philosophical ambivalence of the concept of Willkür in and after Kant. The aim of my chapter is to defend it against the charge of irrationality and mere chance, and to rehabilitate it from a historical and analytic point of view. I will analyze Kant’s use of the word “Willkür” (power of choice), and chronologically follow the semantic and systematic changes in his philosophical work. Finally, I address recent attempts to revitalize the concept of Willkür in the analytic debate by referring to the work of Harry Frankfurt and Robert Kane. I shall argue that we need to distinguish between two kinds of libera arbitria. Whereas the liberum arbitrium indifferentiae can be interpreted in terms of the pejorative sense of “Willkür”—as mere chance—the liberum arbitrium voluntatis equals a reflective kind of Willkür—literal Will-kür (“choice”)—which involves freedom of the will.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dcterms:title>Ambivalent Freedom : Kant and the Problem of Willkür</dcterms:title>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/58252"/>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
    <dc:contributor>Noller, Jörg</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Noller, Jörg</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2022-08-09T12:00:31Z</dcterms:available>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/>
    <dc:language>deu</dc:language>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2022-08-09T12:00:31Z</dc:date>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
Internal note
xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter
Contact
URL of original publication
Test date of URL
Examination date of dissertation
Method of financing
Comment on publication
Alliance license
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
International Co-Authors
Bibliography of Konstanz
No
Refereed