@article{Murray2017eatin-55365,
  year={2017},
  doi={10.1002/eat.22779},
  title={Are eating disorders "all about control?" : The elusive psychopathology of nonfat phobic presentations},
  number={11},
  volume={50},
  issn={0276-3478},
  journal={International Journal of Eating Disorders},
  pages={1306--1312},
  author={Murray, Helen B. and Coniglio, Kathryn and Hartmann, Andrea S. and Becker, Anne E. and Eddy, Kamryn T. and Thomas, Jennifer J.}
}

<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/55365">
    <dc:creator>Coniglio, Kathryn</dc:creator>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/55365"/>
    <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
    <dc:creator>Eddy, Kamryn T.</dc:creator>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
    <dc:contributor>Thomas, Jennifer J.</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Hartmann, Andrea S.</dc:creator>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-10-26T08:45:45Z</dc:date>
    <dc:creator>Murray, Helen B.</dc:creator>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
    <dcterms:title>Are eating disorders "all about control?" : The elusive psychopathology of nonfat phobic presentations</dcterms:title>
    <dc:contributor>Coniglio, Kathryn</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Hartmann, Andrea S.</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Eddy, Kamryn T.</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Becker, Anne E.</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:issued>2017</dcterms:issued>
    <dc:contributor>Murray, Helen B.</dc:contributor>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dc:contributor>Becker, Anne E.</dc:contributor>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-10-26T08:45:45Z</dcterms:available>
    <dc:creator>Thomas, Jennifer J.</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Objective:&lt;br /&gt;There are a subset of individuals with eating disorders (EDs) who do not overevaluate body shape/weight (i.e., nonfat phobic ED; NFP-ED). According to the transdiagnostic cognitive–behavioral conceptualization of EDs, a need for control, in general, is hypothesized as the core psychopathology of NFP-EDs, with shape- and weight-related motivations for ED behavior merely superimposed in FP-ED presentations. This study tested the need for control as motivation for restriction in NFP-ED, using items aimed at assessing control from the Eating Disorder Examination (EDE) Restraint scale.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Method:&lt;br /&gt;Females ages 13–27 years consecutively admitted to residential treatment completed the EDE, Eating Disorder Inventory-3 Drive for Thinness subscale (EDI-DFT), and other self-report measures of psychopathology. We included patients with DSM-5 EDs, but excluded patients with avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder. Twenty participants had NFP-ED (≤14 on EDI-DFT) and 124 had fatphobic ED (FP-ED; &gt;14 on EDI-DFT).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Results:&lt;br /&gt;NFP-ED scored significantly lower than FP-ED on EDE Restraint scale shape/weight [χ2(1) = 10.73–35.62, p's &lt; .01] and on control items [χ2(1) = 10.72–20.62, p's &lt; .01], in addition to scoring lower on measures of general psychopathology and impairment.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Discussion:&lt;br /&gt;Findings suggest those with NFP-ED report lower psychopathology overall and the new EDE Restraint scale control items do not capture additional motivation for restriction beyond that captured in the original Restraint scale shape/weight items. Future research should examine whether this latter finding is due to a minimizing response style in NFP-ED, an incomplete capture of desire for control by the EDE assessment method, or indeed reflects that need for control does not motivate restriction in NFP-EDs.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>