The impact of revised DSM-5 criteria on the relative distribution and inter-rater reliability of eating disorder diagnoses in a residential treatment setting
The impact of revised DSM-5 criteria on the relative distribution and inter-rater reliability of eating disorder diagnoses in a residential treatment setting
No Thumbnail Available
Files
There are no files associated with this item.
Date
2015
Authors
Thomas, Jennifer J.
Eddy, Kamryn T.
Murray, Helen B.
Tromp, Marilou D. P.
Stone, Melissa T.
Levendusky, Philip G.
Becker, Anne E.
Editors
Journal ISSN
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliographical data
Publisher
Series
DOI (citable link)
International patent number
Link to the license
EU project number
Project
Open Access publication
Collections
Title in another language
Publication type
Journal article
Publication status
Published
Published in
Psychiatry Research ; 229 (2015), 1-2. - pp. 517-523. - Elsevier. - ISSN 0165-1781. - eISSN 1872-7123
Abstract
This study evaluated the relative distribution and inter-rater reliability of revised DSM-5 criteria for eating disorders in a residential treatment program. Consecutive adolescent and young adult females (N=150) admitted to a residential eating disorder treatment facility were assigned both DSM-IV and DSM-5 diagnoses by a clinician (n=14) via routine clinical interview and a research assessor (n=4) via structured interview. We compared the frequency of diagnostic assignments under each taxonomy and by type of assessor. We evaluated concordance between clinician and researcher assignment through inter-rater reliability kappa and percent agreement. Significantly fewer patients received either clinician or researcher diagnoses of a residual eating disorder under DSM-5 (clinician-12.0%; researcher-31.3%) versus DSM-IV (clinician-28.7%; researcher-59.3%), with the majority of reassigned DSM-IV residual cases reclassified as DSM-5 anorexia nervosa. Researcher and clinician diagnoses showed moderate inter-rater reliability under DSM-IV (κ=.48) and DSM-5 (κ=.57), though agreement for specific DSM-5 other specified feeding or eating disorder (OSFED) presentations was poor (κ=.05). DSM-5 revisions were associated with significantly less frequent residual eating disorder diagnoses, but not with reduced inter-rater reliability. Findings support specific dimensions of clinical utility for revised DSM-5 criteria for eating disorders.
Summary in another language
Subject (DDC)
150 Psychology
Keywords
DSM-5, Eating disorder, Diagnostic reliability, Other specified feeding or eating disorder (OSFED), Eating disorder not otherwise specified (EDNOS)
Conference
Review
undefined / . - undefined, undefined. - (undefined; undefined)
Cite This
ISO 690
THOMAS, Jennifer J., Kamryn T. EDDY, Helen B. MURRAY, Marilou D. P. TROMP, Andrea S. HARTMANN, Melissa T. STONE, Philip G. LEVENDUSKY, Anne E. BECKER, 2015. The impact of revised DSM-5 criteria on the relative distribution and inter-rater reliability of eating disorder diagnoses in a residential treatment setting. In: Psychiatry Research. Elsevier. 229(1-2), pp. 517-523. ISSN 0165-1781. eISSN 1872-7123. Available under: doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2015.06.017BibTex
@article{Thomas2015-09-30impac-55306, year={2015}, doi={10.1016/j.psychres.2015.06.017}, title={The impact of revised DSM-5 criteria on the relative distribution and inter-rater reliability of eating disorder diagnoses in a residential treatment setting}, number={1-2}, volume={229}, issn={0165-1781}, journal={Psychiatry Research}, pages={517--523}, author={Thomas, Jennifer J. and Eddy, Kamryn T. and Murray, Helen B. and Tromp, Marilou D. P. and Hartmann, Andrea S. and Stone, Melissa T. and Levendusky, Philip G. and Becker, Anne E.} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/55306"> <dc:creator>Tromp, Marilou D. P.</dc:creator> <dc:creator>Hartmann, Andrea S.</dc:creator> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">This study evaluated the relative distribution and inter-rater reliability of revised DSM-5 criteria for eating disorders in a residential treatment program. Consecutive adolescent and young adult females (N=150) admitted to a residential eating disorder treatment facility were assigned both DSM-IV and DSM-5 diagnoses by a clinician (n=14) via routine clinical interview and a research assessor (n=4) via structured interview. We compared the frequency of diagnostic assignments under each taxonomy and by type of assessor. We evaluated concordance between clinician and researcher assignment through inter-rater reliability kappa and percent agreement. Significantly fewer patients received either clinician or researcher diagnoses of a residual eating disorder under DSM-5 (clinician-12.0%; researcher-31.3%) versus DSM-IV (clinician-28.7%; researcher-59.3%), with the majority of reassigned DSM-IV residual cases reclassified as DSM-5 anorexia nervosa. Researcher and clinician diagnoses showed moderate inter-rater reliability under DSM-IV (κ=.48) and DSM-5 (κ=.57), though agreement for specific DSM-5 other specified feeding or eating disorder (OSFED) presentations was poor (κ=.05). DSM-5 revisions were associated with significantly less frequent residual eating disorder diagnoses, but not with reduced inter-rater reliability. Findings support specific dimensions of clinical utility for revised DSM-5 criteria for eating disorders.</dcterms:abstract> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <dcterms:title>The impact of revised DSM-5 criteria on the relative distribution and inter-rater reliability of eating disorder diagnoses in a residential treatment setting</dcterms:title> <dc:creator>Murray, Helen B.</dc:creator> <dc:creator>Becker, Anne E.</dc:creator> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/> <dc:contributor>Levendusky, Philip G.</dc:contributor> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dc:contributor>Tromp, Marilou D. P.</dc:contributor> <dc:creator>Eddy, Kamryn T.</dc:creator> <dc:contributor>Becker, Anne E.</dc:contributor> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/> <dc:creator>Levendusky, Philip G.</dc:creator> <dc:contributor>Murray, Helen B.</dc:contributor> <dc:contributor>Eddy, Kamryn T.</dc:contributor> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-10-20T10:53:39Z</dc:date> <dc:contributor>Stone, Melissa T.</dc:contributor> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/> <dc:contributor>Thomas, Jennifer J.</dc:contributor> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-10-20T10:53:39Z</dcterms:available> <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights> <dc:creator>Thomas, Jennifer J.</dc:creator> <dcterms:issued>2015-09-30</dcterms:issued> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/55306"/> <dc:creator>Stone, Melissa T.</dc:creator> <dc:contributor>Hartmann, Andrea S.</dc:contributor> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>
Internal note
xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter
Examination date of dissertation
Method of financing
Comment on publication
Alliance license
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
International Co-Authors
Bibliography of Konstanz
No
Refereed
Yes