The Necessity of Discretion : A Behavioral Evaluation of Bottom-Up Implementation Theory
The Necessity of Discretion : A Behavioral Evaluation of Bottom-Up Implementation Theory
Date
2018
Authors
Editors
Journal ISSN
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliographical data
Publisher
Series
URI (citable link)
DOI (citable link)
International patent number
Link to the license
EU project number
Project
Open Access publication
Collections
Title in another language
Publication type
Journal article
Publication status
Published
Published in
Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory ; 28 (2018), 4. - pp. 583-601. - Oxford University Press. - ISSN 1053-1858. - eISSN 1477-9803
Abstract
The topic of discretion continues to be hotly debated in policy design and policy implementation. In top-down theories, discretion at the frontline is often seen as a control problem: discretion should be avoided as it can mean that the policy is not implemented as intended. Conversely, bottom-up theories state that discretion can help policy implementers tailor a policy to specific circumstances. However, there has been little systematic research into how the experience of having discretion motivates frontline workers to implement a policy. We conceptualize and evaluate this relationship by combining public administration and motivation literature, using datasets in healthcare and education and large-N set-theoretic configurational analysis. Results robustly show that experiencing discretion is a quasi-necessary condition and, hence, a prerequisite for high implementation willingness. This finding is more in line with bottom-up than with top-down theories. Policy implementers crucially need the freedom to adapt the program to local conditions for being motivated to implement a policy. The evidence encourages scholars and practitioners to move from the question whether frontline workers should be granted discretion to how to best make use of frontline workers’ discretion instead.
Summary in another language
Subject (DDC)
320 Politics
Keywords
Conference
Review
undefined / . - undefined, undefined. - (undefined; undefined)
Cite This
ISO 690
THOMANN, Eva, Nadine VAN ENGEN, Lars TUMMERS, 2018. The Necessity of Discretion : A Behavioral Evaluation of Bottom-Up Implementation Theory. In: Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. Oxford University Press. 28(4), pp. 583-601. ISSN 1053-1858. eISSN 1477-9803. Available under: doi: 10.1093/jopart/muy024BibTex
@article{Thomann2018-10Neces-52367, year={2018}, doi={10.1093/jopart/muy024}, title={The Necessity of Discretion : A Behavioral Evaluation of Bottom-Up Implementation Theory}, number={4}, volume={28}, issn={1053-1858}, journal={Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory}, pages={583--601}, author={Thomann, Eva and van Engen, Nadine and Tummers, Lars} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/52367"> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/"/> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">The topic of discretion continues to be hotly debated in policy design and policy implementation. In top-down theories, discretion at the frontline is often seen as a control problem: discretion should be avoided as it can mean that the policy is not implemented as intended. Conversely, bottom-up theories state that discretion can help policy implementers tailor a policy to specific circumstances. However, there has been little systematic research into how the experience of having discretion motivates frontline workers to implement a policy. We conceptualize and evaluate this relationship by combining public administration and motivation literature, using datasets in healthcare and education and large-N set-theoretic configurational analysis. Results robustly show that experiencing discretion is a quasi-necessary condition and, hence, a prerequisite for high implementation willingness. This finding is more in line with bottom-up than with top-down theories. Policy implementers crucially need the freedom to adapt the program to local conditions for being motivated to implement a policy. The evidence encourages scholars and practitioners to move from the question whether frontline workers should be granted discretion to how to best make use of frontline workers’ discretion instead.</dcterms:abstract> <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/52367/1/Thomann_2-16mdpwsp7ig531.pdf"/> <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/52367/1/Thomann_2-16mdpwsp7ig531.pdf"/> <dc:creator>van Engen, Nadine</dc:creator> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-01-12T14:38:30Z</dc:date> <dc:contributor>Tummers, Lars</dc:contributor> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <dcterms:issued>2018-10</dcterms:issued> <dcterms:title>The Necessity of Discretion : A Behavioral Evaluation of Bottom-Up Implementation Theory</dcterms:title> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/52367"/> <dc:rights>Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International</dc:rights> <dc:creator>Thomann, Eva</dc:creator> <dc:creator>Tummers, Lars</dc:creator> <dc:contributor>van Engen, Nadine</dc:contributor> <dc:contributor>Thomann, Eva</dc:contributor> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-01-12T14:38:30Z</dcterms:available> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>
Internal note
xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter
Examination date of dissertation
Method of financing
Comment on publication
Alliance license
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
International Co-Authors
Bibliography of Konstanz
No
Refereed
Unknown