Aufgrund von Vorbereitungen auf eine neue Version von KOPS, können kommenden Montag und Dienstag keine Publikationen eingereicht werden. (Due to preparations for a new version of KOPS, no publications can be submitted next Monday and Tuesday.)
Type of Publication: | Journal article |
Publication status: | Published |
URI (citable link): | http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:352-2-1wh36el1fn06y0 |
Author: | Häusele, Benedikt; Gindele, Maxim B.; Cölfen, Helmut |
Year of publication: | 2021 |
Published in: | Journal of Chromatography A ; 1635 (2021). - 461631. - Elsevier. - ISSN 0021-9673. - eISSN 1873-3778 |
Pubmed ID: | 33260023 |
DOI (citable link): | https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2020.461631 |
Summary: |
Asymmetrical flow field-flow fractionation is a versatile chromatographic fractionation method. In combination with at least one detection technique it is used for size-based separation of colloids, biomolecules and polymers. Although often used as pure separation method, a well-elaborated theory is available that allows precise quantification of the translational diffusion coefficient D. Still, current literature suggests different ways to transform this theory into applicable experimental procedures and no “gold standard” for correct data processing exists. While some sources report a direct way to extract diffusion information from the fractogram, others suggest the necessity of an external calibration measurement to obtain the channel width w. In this work, we compare the different approaches and calibration algorithms based on original and literature data using our own open-source AF4 evaluation software. Based on the results, we conclude that available AF4 setups do not fulfill the requirements for absolute measurements of D. We show that the best way to conduct is to consider the area of the channel and D of the calibrant while neglecting the small peak which occurs in the void peak region.
|
Subject (DDC): | 540 Chemistry |
Keywords: | Asymmetrical flow field-flow fractionation, channel width determination, size determination, calibration |
Link to License: | In Copyright |
Bibliography of Konstanz: | Yes |
Refereed: | Yes |
HÄUSELE, Benedikt, Maxim B. GINDELE, Helmut CÖLFEN, 2021. Revision of the calibration experiment in asymmetrical flow field-flow fractionation. In: Journal of Chromatography A. Elsevier. 1635, 461631. ISSN 0021-9673. eISSN 1873-3778. Available under: doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2020.461631
@article{Hausele2021-01-04Revis-51738, title={Revision of the calibration experiment in asymmetrical flow field-flow fractionation}, year={2021}, doi={10.1016/j.chroma.2020.461631}, volume={1635}, issn={0021-9673}, journal={Journal of Chromatography A}, author={Häusele, Benedikt and Gindele, Maxim B. and Cölfen, Helmut}, note={Article Number: 461631} }
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/51738"> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Asymmetrical flow field-flow fractionation is a versatile chromatographic fractionation method. In combination with at least one detection technique it is used for size-based separation of colloids, biomolecules and polymers. Although often used as pure separation method, a well-elaborated theory is available that allows precise quantification of the translational diffusion coefficient D. Still, current literature suggests different ways to transform this theory into applicable experimental procedures and no “gold standard” for correct data processing exists. While some sources report a direct way to extract diffusion information from the fractogram, others suggest the necessity of an external calibration measurement to obtain the channel width w. In this work, we compare the different approaches and calibration algorithms based on original and literature data using our own open-source AF4 evaluation software. Based on the results, we conclude that available AF4 setups do not fulfill the requirements for absolute measurements of D. We show that the best way to conduct is to consider the area of the channel and D of the calibrant while neglecting the small peak which occurs in the void peak region.</dcterms:abstract> <dcterms:issued>2021-01-04</dcterms:issued> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/51738"/> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/29"/> <dc:creator>Häusele, Benedikt</dc:creator> <dc:contributor>Gindele, Maxim B.</dc:contributor> <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2020-11-11T10:00:46Z</dcterms:available> <dc:creator>Gindele, Maxim B.</dc:creator> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2020-11-11T10:00:46Z</dc:date> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/29"/> <dcterms:title>Revision of the calibration experiment in asymmetrical flow field-flow fractionation</dcterms:title> <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/51738/1/Haeusele_2-1wh36el1fn06y0.pdf"/> <dc:contributor>Cölfen, Helmut</dc:contributor> <dc:creator>Cölfen, Helmut</dc:creator> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/jspui"/> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dc:contributor>Häusele, Benedikt</dc:contributor> <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/51738/1/Haeusele_2-1wh36el1fn06y0.pdf"/> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>
Haeusele_2-1wh36el1fn06y0.pdf | 4 |