KOPS - The Institutional Repository of the University of Konstanz

Phylogenetic, spatial and environmental components of extinction risk in carnivores

Phylogenetic, spatial and environmental components of extinction risk in carnivores

Cite This

Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

SAFI, Kamran, Nathalie PETTORELLI, 2010. Phylogenetic, spatial and environmental components of extinction risk in carnivores. In: Global Ecology and Biogeography. Wiley-Blackwell. 19(3), pp. 352-362. ISSN 0960-7447. eISSN 1466-8238. Available under: doi: 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00523.x

@article{Safi2010Phylo-51672, title={Phylogenetic, spatial and environmental components of extinction risk in carnivores}, year={2010}, doi={10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00523.x}, number={3}, volume={19}, issn={0960-7447}, journal={Global Ecology and Biogeography}, pages={352--362}, author={Safi, Kamran and Pettorelli, Nathalie} }

2020-11-05T13:49:26Z Pettorelli, Nathalie Safi, Kamran Aim<br />Extinction risk is non‐randomly distributed across phylogeny and space and is influenced by environmental conditions. We quantified the relative contribution of these factors to extinction risk to unveil the underlying macroecological processes and derive predictive models.<br /><br />Location<br />Global.<br /><br />Methods<br />Based on the IUCN global assessments, we divided 192 carnivore species into two dichotomous classes representing different levels of extinction risk. We used spatial proximity, phylogenetic relationship and environmental variables together with phylogenetic eigenvector regression and spatial eigenvector filters to model and predict threat status.<br /><br />Results<br />Our full models explained between 57% and 96% of the variance in extinction risk. Phylogeny and spatial proximity roughly explained between 21% and 70% of the total variation in all analyses, while the explanatory power of environmental conditions was relatively weaker (up to 15%). Phylogeny and spatial proximity contributed equally to the explained variance in the lower threat level, while spatial proximity was the most important factor in the models of the higher threat level. Prediction of threat status achieved 97% correct assignments.<br /><br />Main conclusions<br />Our approach differs fundamentally from current studies of extinction risk because it does not necessarily rely on life‐history information. We clearly show that instead of treating phylogenetic inertia and spatial signal as statistical nuisances, space and phylogeny should be viewed as very useful in explaining a wide range of phenomena in comparative studies. eng Phylogenetic, spatial and environmental components of extinction risk in carnivores 2010 Pettorelli, Nathalie Safi, Kamran 2020-11-05T13:49:26Z terms-of-use

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Search KOPS


Browse

My Account