Type of Publication: | Journal article |
Publication status: | Published |
Author: | Wendelborn, Christian |
Year of publication: | 2020 |
Published in: | Oxford Review of Education ; 2020. - Routledge, Taylor & Francis. - ISSN 0305-4985. - eISSN 1465-3915 |
DOI (citable link): | https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2020.1759520 |
Summary: |
Michael Hand argues in his article ‘Against autonomy as an educational aim’ that the project of erecting autonomy as an educational aim is wrongheaded. I argue that his argument fails. I discuss two lines of his argument that deal with different senses of autonomy. The first line of argument trades on an ambiguity. As soon as we disambiguate, we can see that this argument is not cogent. The second misconstrues the point of the concept of autonomy Hand discusses in this line of argument.
|
Subject (DDC): | 100 Philosophy |
Keywords: | Autonomy; educational aim; Michael Hand; ambiguity; second-order desires; Harry Frankfurt |
Bibliography of Konstanz: | Yes |
Refereed: | Yes |
Online First: Journal articles that are published online before they appear as an actual part of a journal issue. Online first articles are published on the journal's website in the publisher's version. | |
Files | Size | Format | View |
---|---|---|---|
There are no files associated with this item. |
WENDELBORN, Christian, 2020. Against Michael Hand’s Against Autonomy as An Educational Aim. In: Oxford Review of Education. Routledge, Taylor & Francis. ISSN 0305-4985. eISSN 1465-3915. Available under: doi: 10.1080/03054985.2020.1759520
@article{Wendelborn2020-05-24Again-50557, title={Against Michael Hand’s Against Autonomy as An Educational Aim}, year={2020}, doi={10.1080/03054985.2020.1759520}, issn={0305-4985}, journal={Oxford Review of Education}, author={Wendelborn, Christian} }
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/50557"> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/50557"/> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2020-08-24T13:13:06Z</dc:date> <dcterms:title>Against Michael Hand’s Against Autonomy as An Educational Aim</dcterms:title> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/jspui"/> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Michael Hand argues in his article ‘Against autonomy as an educational aim’ that the project of erecting autonomy as an educational aim is wrongheaded. I argue that his argument fails. I discuss two lines of his argument that deal with different senses of autonomy. The first line of argument trades on an ambiguity. As soon as we disambiguate, we can see that this argument is not cogent. The second misconstrues the point of the concept of autonomy Hand discusses in this line of argument.</dcterms:abstract> <dc:contributor>Wendelborn, Christian</dc:contributor> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2020-08-24T13:13:06Z</dcterms:available> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dc:creator>Wendelborn, Christian</dc:creator> <dcterms:issued>2020-05-24</dcterms:issued> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>