Adaptation of the Systematic Review Framework to the Assessment of Toxicological Test Methods : Challenges and Lessons Learned with the Zebrafish Embryotoxicity Test
Dateien
Datum
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
URI (zitierfähiger Link)
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Link zur Lizenz
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Publikationsstatus
Erschienen in
Zusammenfassung
Systematic review methodology is a means of addressing specific questions through structured, consistent, and transparent examinations of the relevant scientific evidence. This methodology has been used to advantage in clinical medicine, and is being adapted for use in other disciplines. While some applications to toxicology have been explored, especially for hazard identification, the present preparatory study is, to our knowledge, the first attempt to adapt it to the assessment of toxicological test methods. As our test case, we chose the zebrafish embryotoxicity test (ZET) for developmental toxicity and its mammalian counterpart, the standard mammalian prenatal development toxicity study, focusing the review on how well the ZET predicts the presence or absence of chemical-induced pre-natal developmental toxicity observed in mammalian studies. An interdisciplinary team prepared a systematic review protocol and adjusted it throughout this piloting phase, where needed. The final protocol was registered and will guide the main study (systematic review), which will execute the protocol to comprehensively answer the review question. The goal of this preparatory study was to translate systematic review methodology to the assessment of toxicological test method performance. Consequently, it focused on the methodological issues encountered, whereas the main study will report substantive findings. These relate to numerous systematic review steps, but primarily to searching and selecting the evidence. Applying the lessons learned to these challenges can improve not only our main study, but may also be helpful to others seeking to use systematic review methodology to compare toxicological test methods. We conclude with a series of recommendations that, if adopted, would help improve the quality of the published literature, and make conducting systematic reviews of toxicological studies faster and easier over time.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
Zitieren
ISO 690
STEPHENS, Martin L., Sevcan Gül AKGÜN-ÖLMEZ, Sebastian HOFFMANN, Rob DE VRIES, Burkhard FLICK, Thomas HARTUNG, Manoj LALU, Alexandra MAERTENS, Hilda WITTERS, Katya TSAIOUN, 2019. Adaptation of the Systematic Review Framework to the Assessment of Toxicological Test Methods : Challenges and Lessons Learned with the Zebrafish Embryotoxicity Test. In: Toxicological Sciences. Oxford University Press (OUP). 2019, 171(1), pp. 56-68. ISSN 1096-6080. eISSN 1096-0929. Available under: doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfz128BibTex
@article{Stephens2019Adapt-50547, year={2019}, doi={10.1093/toxsci/kfz128}, title={Adaptation of the Systematic Review Framework to the Assessment of Toxicological Test Methods : Challenges and Lessons Learned with the Zebrafish Embryotoxicity Test}, number={1}, volume={171}, issn={1096-6080}, journal={Toxicological Sciences}, pages={56--68}, author={Stephens, Martin L. and Akgün-Ölmez, Sevcan Gül and Hoffmann, Sebastian and De Vries, Rob and Flick, Burkhard and Hartung, Thomas and Lalu, Manoj and Maertens, Alexandra and Witters, Hilda and Tsaioun, Katya} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/50547"> <dc:contributor>Witters, Hilda</dc:contributor> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dc:creator>De Vries, Rob</dc:creator> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dc:creator>Witters, Hilda</dc:creator> <dc:contributor>Akgün-Ölmez, Sevcan Gül</dc:contributor> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Systematic review methodology is a means of addressing specific questions through structured, consistent, and transparent examinations of the relevant scientific evidence. This methodology has been used to advantage in clinical medicine, and is being adapted for use in other disciplines. While some applications to toxicology have been explored, especially for hazard identification, the present preparatory study is, to our knowledge, the first attempt to adapt it to the assessment of toxicological test methods. As our test case, we chose the zebrafish embryotoxicity test (ZET) for developmental toxicity and its mammalian counterpart, the standard mammalian prenatal development toxicity study, focusing the review on how well the ZET predicts the presence or absence of chemical-induced pre-natal developmental toxicity observed in mammalian studies. An interdisciplinary team prepared a systematic review protocol and adjusted it throughout this piloting phase, where needed. The final protocol was registered and will guide the main study (systematic review), which will execute the protocol to comprehensively answer the review question. The goal of this preparatory study was to translate systematic review methodology to the assessment of toxicological test method performance. Consequently, it focused on the methodological issues encountered, whereas the main study will report substantive findings. These relate to numerous systematic review steps, but primarily to searching and selecting the evidence. Applying the lessons learned to these challenges can improve not only our main study, but may also be helpful to others seeking to use systematic review methodology to compare toxicological test methods. We conclude with a series of recommendations that, if adopted, would help improve the quality of the published literature, and make conducting systematic reviews of toxicological studies faster and easier over time.</dcterms:abstract> <dc:creator>Akgün-Ölmez, Sevcan Gül</dc:creator> <dc:creator>Tsaioun, Katya</dc:creator> <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/50547/1/Stephens_2-1qts1ns6vdazs2.pdf"/> <dc:contributor>Hoffmann, Sebastian</dc:contributor> <dc:contributor>De Vries, Rob</dc:contributor> <dc:creator>Maertens, Alexandra</dc:creator> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/"/> <dc:contributor>Hartung, Thomas</dc:contributor> <dcterms:issued>2019</dcterms:issued> <dc:creator>Flick, Burkhard</dc:creator> <dc:contributor>Flick, Burkhard</dc:contributor> <dc:creator>Hoffmann, Sebastian</dc:creator> <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/50547/1/Stephens_2-1qts1ns6vdazs2.pdf"/> <dc:creator>Stephens, Martin L.</dc:creator> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2020-08-20T13:43:00Z</dcterms:available> <dc:rights>Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International</dc:rights> <dc:contributor>Tsaioun, Katya</dc:contributor> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2020-08-20T13:43:00Z</dc:date> <dc:contributor>Maertens, Alexandra</dc:contributor> <dc:creator>Lalu, Manoj</dc:creator> <dc:creator>Hartung, Thomas</dc:creator> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/50547"/> <dc:contributor>Lalu, Manoj</dc:contributor> <dc:contributor>Stephens, Martin L.</dc:contributor> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/28"/> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/28"/> <dcterms:title>Adaptation of the Systematic Review Framework to the Assessment of Toxicological Test Methods : Challenges and Lessons Learned with the Zebrafish Embryotoxicity Test</dcterms:title> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>