The European Company : Original expectations and deficiencies of implementation

Keller, Berndt; Rosenbohm, Sophie

The European Company : Original expectations and deficiencies of implementation

Dateien

Keller_2-17gi06b12osmn0.pdf(118.15 KB)

Datum

2020

Autor:innen

Keller, Berndt

Rosenbohm, Sophie

Publikationstyp

Zeitschriftenartikel

Publikationsstatus

Published

Erschienen in

European Journal of Industrial Relations ; 26 (2020), 1. - S. 23-39. - Sage. - ISSN 0959-6801. - eISSN 1461-7129

Zusammenfassung

We address the failures of the implementation of the European Company Directive and their far-reaching consequences, and discuss options for necessary amendments and improvements. We present empirical data on the characteristics of European companies and their distribution across EU Member States, and discuss major unexpected results of transposition and implementation as well as many evident problems. We then develop options for amendments, including definition of structural changes, mandatory introduction of employee involvement and extension of the ‘before and after’ principle. Finally, we analyse the history of the review process and explain why amendments have not and will most likely not be introduced despite obvious failures and deficiencies.

Fachgebiet (DDC)

320 Politik

Schlagwörter

Employee involvement, EU company law, European Company, European industrial relations, Europeanization, Societas Europaea (SE)

Zitieren

ISO 690

KELLER, Berndt, Sophie ROSENBOHM, 2020. The European Company : Original expectations and deficiencies of implementation. In: European Journal of Industrial Relations. Sage. 26(1), pp. 23-39. ISSN 0959-6801. eISSN 1461-7129. Available under: doi: 10.1177/0959680118825057

BibTex

@article{Keller2020-03Europ-49390,
  year={2020},
  doi={10.1177/0959680118825057},
  title={The European Company : Original expectations and deficiencies of implementation},
  number={1},
  volume={26},
  issn={0959-6801},
  journal={European Journal of Industrial Relations},
  pages={23--39},
  author={Keller, Berndt and Rosenbohm, Sophie}
}

RDF

<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/49390">
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/49390"/>
    <dc:creator>Rosenbohm, Sophie</dc:creator>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2020-05-05T13:28:30Z</dc:date>
    <dc:contributor>Keller, Berndt</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/49390/1/Keller_2-17gi06b12osmn0.pdf"/>
    <dcterms:title>The European Company : Original expectations and deficiencies of implementation</dcterms:title>
    <dc:contributor>Rosenbohm, Sophie</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2020-05-05T13:28:30Z</dcterms:available>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
    <dcterms:issued>2020-03</dcterms:issued>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">We address the failures of the implementation of the European Company Directive and their far-reaching consequences, and discuss options for necessary amendments and improvements. We present empirical data on the characteristics of European companies and their distribution across EU Member States, and discuss major unexpected results of transposition and implementation as well as many evident problems. We then develop options for amendments, including definition of structural changes, mandatory introduction of employee involvement and extension of the ‘before and after’ principle. Finally, we analyse the history of the review process and explain why amendments have not and will most likely not be introduced despite obvious failures and deficiencies.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/49390/1/Keller_2-17gi06b12osmn0.pdf"/>
    <dc:creator>Keller, Berndt</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Universitätsbibliographie

Ja

Begutachtet

Ja