KOPS - The Institutional Repository of the University of Konstanz

Asking Sensitive Questions : An Evaluation of the Randomized Response Technique Versus Direct Questioning Using Individual Validation Data

Asking Sensitive Questions : An Evaluation of the Randomized Response Technique Versus Direct Questioning Using Individual Validation Data

Cite This

Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

WOLTER, Felix, Peter PREISENDÖRFER, 2013. Asking Sensitive Questions : An Evaluation of the Randomized Response Technique Versus Direct Questioning Using Individual Validation Data. In: Sociological Methods & Research. 42(3), pp. 321-353. ISSN 0049-1241. eISSN 1552-8294. Available under: doi: 10.1177/0049124113500474

@article{Wolter2013-09-23Askin-47567, title={Asking Sensitive Questions : An Evaluation of the Randomized Response Technique Versus Direct Questioning Using Individual Validation Data}, year={2013}, doi={10.1177/0049124113500474}, number={3}, volume={42}, issn={0049-1241}, journal={Sociological Methods & Research}, pages={321--353}, author={Wolter, Felix and Preisendörfer, Peter} }

<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/47567"> <dc:creator>Wolter, Felix</dc:creator> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2019-11-19T11:43:13Z</dcterms:available> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/34"/> <dc:contributor>Preisendörfer, Peter</dc:contributor> <dcterms:title>Asking Sensitive Questions : An Evaluation of the Randomized Response Technique Versus Direct Questioning Using Individual Validation Data</dcterms:title> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2019-11-19T11:43:13Z</dc:date> <dcterms:issued>2013-09-23</dcterms:issued> <dc:contributor>Wolter, Felix</dc:contributor> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/47567"/> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">This article is an empirical contribution to the evaluation of the randomized response technique (RRT), a prominent procedure to elicit more valid responses to sensitive questions in surveys. Based on individual validation data, we focus on two questions: First, does the RRT lead to higher prevalence estimates of sensitive behavior than direct questioning (DQ)? Second, are there differences in the effects of determinants of misreporting according to question mode? The data come from 552 face-to-face interviews with subjects who had been convicted by a court for minor criminal offences in a metropolitan area in Germany. For the first question, the answer is negative. For the second, it is positive, that is, effects of individual and situational determinants of misreporting differ between the two question modes. The effect of need for social approval, for example, tends to be stronger in RRT than in DQ mode. Interviewer experience turns out to be positively related to answer validity in DQ and negatively in RRT mode. Our findings support a skeptical position toward RRT, shed new light on long-standing debates within survey methodology, and stimulate theoretical reasoning about response behavior in surveys.</dcterms:abstract> <dc:creator>Preisendörfer, Peter</dc:creator> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/jspui"/> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/34"/> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Search KOPS


Browse

My Account