The many faces of uniformitarianism in linguistics

Cite This

Files in this item

Checksum: MD5:d41b32859dd9df0a8dec3c5f106fbd1c

WALKDEN, George, 2019. The many faces of uniformitarianism in linguistics. In: Glossa : A Journal of General Linguistics. 4(1), 52. eISSN 2397-1835. Available under: doi: 10.5334/gjgl.888

@article{Walkden2019-05-20faces-46445, title={The many faces of uniformitarianism in linguistics}, year={2019}, doi={10.5334/gjgl.888}, number={1}, volume={4}, journal={Glossa : A Journal of General Linguistics}, author={Walkden, George}, note={Article Number: 52} }

<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/46445"> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2019-07-18T09:53:04Z</dcterms:available> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/45"/> <dcterms:title>The many faces of uniformitarianism in linguistics</dcterms:title> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/46445"/> <dc:creator>Walkden, George</dc:creator> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/jspui"/> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/45"/> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">The notion of uniformitarianism, originally borrowed into linguistics from the earth sciences, is widely considered to be a foundational principle in modern historical linguistics. However, there are almost as many interpretations of uniformitarianism as there are historical linguists who take the time to define the notion. In this paper I argue, following Gould (1965; 1987), that this confusion results from the fact that uniformitarianism as originally proposed in geology is not itself a uniform notion, and permits at least four readings. Only some of these readings involve substantive claims rather than methodological imperatives, and only some of these readings are useful for the study of language change. The weakest conclusion to be drawn is that these distinct notions need to be kept apart when invoked by historical linguists.</dcterms:abstract> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2019-07-18T09:53:04Z</dc:date> <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/46445/3/Walkden_2-1ch7qp5tya3g42.pdf"/> <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/46445/3/Walkden_2-1ch7qp5tya3g42.pdf"/> <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights> <dc:contributor>Walkden, George</dc:contributor> <dcterms:issued>2019-05-20</dcterms:issued> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>

Downloads since Jul 18, 2019 (Information about access statistics)

Walkden_2-1ch7qp5tya3g42.pdf 102

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Search KOPS


Browse

My Account