KOPS - The Institutional Repository of the University of Konstanz

A Bird’s Eye View on ECJ Judgments on Immigration, Asylum and Border Control Cases

Aufgrund von Vorbereitungen auf eine neue Version von KOPS, können kommenden Montag und Dienstag keine Publikationen eingereicht werden. (Due to preparations for a new version of KOPS, no publications can be submitted next Monday and Tuesday.)

A Bird’s Eye View on ECJ Judgments on Immigration, Asylum and Border Control Cases

Cite This

Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

THYM, Daniel, 2019. A Bird’s Eye View on ECJ Judgments on Immigration, Asylum and Border Control Cases. In: European Journal of Migration and Law. 21(2), pp. 166-193. ISSN 1388-364X. eISSN 1571-8166. Available under: doi: 10.1163/15718166-12340046

@article{Thym2019-05-07Birds-46059, title={A Bird’s Eye View on ECJ Judgments on Immigration, Asylum and Border Control Cases}, year={2019}, doi={10.1163/15718166-12340046}, number={2}, volume={21}, issn={1388-364X}, journal={European Journal of Migration and Law}, pages={166--193}, author={Thym, Daniel} }

<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/46059"> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/44"/> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dc:contributor>Thym, Daniel</dc:contributor> <dc:creator>Thym, Daniel</dc:creator> <dcterms:title>A Bird’s Eye View on ECJ Judgments on Immigration, Asylum and Border Control Cases</dcterms:title> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2019-06-19T12:49:44Z</dcterms:available> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Many experts of EU migration law deal with ECJ judgments on a regular basis, but they rarely reflect on how individual rulings on diverse themes such as asylum, family reunification or return relate to each other. This article fills that gap and presents a horizontal analysis of 155 judgments combining quantitative and qualitative findings. Our statistical survey shows that selected themes and references from certain countries dominate the ECJ’s activities. In qualitative terms, the article considers three overarching themes: the concept of public policy; the practice of statutory interpretation, including in light of objectives: the principle of proportionality and interaction with domestic courts. Our study shows that the search for cross-sectoral coherence defines much of the case law, although success of this venture is compromised by enduring inconsistencies, which complicate the emergence of a reliable and predictable judicial approach towards the interpretation of secondary legislation on migration.</dcterms:abstract> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2019-06-19T12:49:44Z</dc:date> <dcterms:issued>2019-05-07</dcterms:issued> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/46059"/> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/jspui"/> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/44"/> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Search KOPS


Browse

My Account