Reasons Pro et Contra as a Debiasing Technique in Legal Contexts

Cite This

Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

ZENKER, Frank, Christian DAHLMAN, Rasmus BÅÅTH, Farhan SARWAR, 2018. Reasons Pro et Contra as a Debiasing Technique in Legal Contexts. In: Psychological Reports. 121(3), pp. 511-526. ISSN 0033-2941. eISSN 1558-691X. Available under: doi: 10.1177/0033294117729807

@article{Zenker2018-06Reaso-42458, title={Reasons Pro et Contra as a Debiasing Technique in Legal Contexts}, year={2018}, doi={10.1177/0033294117729807}, number={3}, volume={121}, issn={0033-2941}, journal={Psychological Reports}, pages={511--526}, author={Zenker, Frank and Dahlman, Christian and Bååth, Rasmus and Sarwar, Farhan} }

<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="" xmlns:dc="" xmlns:rdf="" xmlns:bibo="" xmlns:dspace="" xmlns:foaf="" xmlns:void="" xmlns:xsd="" > <rdf:Description rdf:about=""> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource=""/> <dc:creator>Dahlman, Christian</dc:creator> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="">2018-05-30T07:12:02Z</dcterms:available> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <bibo:uri rdf:resource=""/> <dc:contributor>Dahlman, Christian</dc:contributor> <dc:contributor>Sarwar, Farhan</dc:contributor> <dcterms:issued>2018-06</dcterms:issued> <dc:contributor>Bååth, Rasmus</dc:contributor> <dc:creator>Zenker, Frank</dc:creator> <dc:creator>Bååth, Rasmus</dc:creator> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Although legal contexts are subject to biased reasoning and decision making, to identify and test debiasing techniques has largely remained an open task. We report on experimentally deploying the technique “giving reasons pro et contra” with professional (N = 239) and lay judges (N = 372) at Swedish municipal courts. Using a mock legal scenario, participants assessed the relevance of an eyewitness’s previous conviction for his credibility. On average, both groups displayed low degrees of bias. We observed a small positive debiasing effect only for professional judges. Strong evidence was obtained for a relation between profession and relevance-assessment: Lay judges seemed to assign a greater importance to the prior conviction than professional judges did. We discuss challenges for future research, calling other research groups to contribute additional samples.</dcterms:abstract> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource=""/> <dcterms:title>Reasons Pro et Contra as a Debiasing Technique in Legal Contexts</dcterms:title> <dc:date rdf:datatype="">2018-05-30T07:12:02Z</dc:date> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/jspui"/> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dc:contributor>Zenker, Frank</dc:contributor> <dc:creator>Sarwar, Farhan</dc:creator> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Search KOPS


My Account