The dative-ergative connection
| Type of Publication: | Contribution to a conference collection |
| Publication status: | Published |
| Author: | Butt, Miriam |
| Year of publication: | 2006 |
| Conference: | Colloque de Syntaxe et de Sémantique à Paris = CSSP 2005 : the syntax and semantics of non-assertive sentences, Sep 29, 2005 - Oct 1, 2005, Paris, Frankreich |
| Published in: | Papers from CSSP 2005 : Travaux présentés à CSSP 2005 / Bonami, Olivier et al. (ed.). - (Empirical issues in formal syntax and semantics ; 6). - pp. 69-92. - ISSN 1769-7158 |
| URL of original publication: | http://www.cssp.cnrs.fr/eiss6/butt-eiss6.pdf, Last access on Feb 2, 2018 |
| Summary: |
The classic division between structural vs. inherent/lexical case proposed within Government-Binding (Chomsky 1981) remains a very popular one, despite evidence to the contrary that the inner workings of case systems are far more complex than this simple division would suggest and that individual case markers generally make a systematic structural and semantic contribution that interacts in a generalizable manner with the lexical semantics of a predicate
|
| Subject (DDC): | 400 Philology, Linguistics |
| Bibliography of Konstanz: | Yes |
Cite This
Files in this item
| Files | Size | Format | View |
|---|---|---|---|
|
There are no files associated with this item. |
|||
BUTT, Miriam, 2006. The dative-ergative connection. Colloque de Syntaxe et de Sémantique à Paris = CSSP 2005 : the syntax and semantics of non-assertive sentences. Paris, Frankreich, Sep 29, 2005 - Oct 1, 2005. In: BONAMI, Olivier, ed. and others. Papers from CSSP 2005 : Travaux présentés à CSSP 2005, pp. 69-92. ISSN 1769-7158
@inproceedings{Butt2006dativ-41211, title={The dative-ergative connection}, url={http://www.cssp.cnrs.fr/eiss6/butt-eiss6.pdf}, year={2006}, number={6}, issn={1769-7158}, series={Empirical issues in formal syntax and semantics}, booktitle={Papers from CSSP 2005 : Travaux présentés à CSSP 2005}, pages={69--92}, editor={Bonami, Olivier}, author={Butt, Miriam} }
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/41211"> <dc:creator>Butt, Miriam</dc:creator> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2018-02-02T10:48:39Z</dcterms:available> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2018-02-02T10:48:39Z</dc:date> <dc:contributor>Butt, Miriam</dc:contributor> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/jspui"/> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">The classic division between structural vs. inherent/lexical case proposed within Government-Binding (Chomsky 1981) remains a very popular one, despite evidence to the contrary that the inner workings of case systems are far more complex than this simple division would suggest and that individual case markers generally make a systematic structural and semantic contribution that interacts in a generalizable manner with the lexical semantics of a predicate</dcterms:abstract> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/41211"/> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/45"/> <dcterms:issued>2006</dcterms:issued> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/45"/> <dcterms:title>The dative-ergative connection</dcterms:title> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Search KOPS
Browse
My Account
