The dative-ergative connection

Publikationstyp: Beitrag zu einer Konferenz
Publikationsstatus: Published
Autor/innen: Butt, Miriam
Erscheinungsjahr: 2006
Konferenz: Colloque de Syntaxe et de Sémantique à Paris = CSSP 2005 : the syntax and semantics of non-assertive sentences, 29. Sep 2005 - 1. Okt 2005, Paris, Frankreich
Erschienen in: Papers from CSSP 2005 : Travaux présentés à CSSP 2005 / Bonami, Olivier et al. (Hrsg.). - (Empirical issues in formal syntax and semantics ; 6). - S. 69-92. - ISSN 1769-7158
URL der Originalveröffentlichung: http://www.cssp.cnrs.fr/eiss6/butt-eiss6.pdf, Letzter Zugriff am 2. Feb 2018
Zusammenfassung:
The classic division between structural vs. inherent/lexical case proposed within Government-Binding (Chomsky 1981) remains a very popular one, despite evidence to the contrary that the inner workings of case systems are far more complex than this simple division would suggest and that individual case markers generally make a systematic structural and semantic contribution that interacts in a generalizable manner with the lexical semantics of a predicate
Fachgebiet (DDC): 400 Sprachwissenschaft, Linguistik
Universitätsbibliographie: Ja

Zitieren

Dateien zu dieser Ressource

Dateien Größe Format Anzeige

Zu diesem Dokument gibt es keine Dateien.

BUTT, Miriam, 2006. The dative-ergative connection. Colloque de Syntaxe et de Sémantique à Paris = CSSP 2005 : the syntax and semantics of non-assertive sentences. Paris, Frankreich, 29. Sep 2005 - 1. Okt 2005. In: BONAMI, Olivier, ed. and others. Papers from CSSP 2005 : Travaux présentés à CSSP 2005. Colloque de Syntaxe et de Sémantique à Paris = CSSP 2005 : the syntax and semantics of non-assertive sentences. Paris, Frankreich, 29. Sep 2005 - 1. Okt 2005, pp. 69-92. ISSN 1769-7158

@inproceedings{Butt2006dativ-41211, title={The dative-ergative connection}, url={http://www.cssp.cnrs.fr/eiss6/butt-eiss6.pdf}, year={2006}, number={6}, issn={1769-7158}, series={Empirical issues in formal syntax and semantics}, booktitle={Papers from CSSP 2005 : Travaux présentés à CSSP 2005}, pages={69--92}, editor={Bonami, Olivier}, author={Butt, Miriam} }

<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/41211"> <dc:creator>Butt, Miriam</dc:creator> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2018-02-02T10:48:39Z</dcterms:available> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2018-02-02T10:48:39Z</dc:date> <dc:contributor>Butt, Miriam</dc:contributor> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/jspui"/> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">The classic division between structural vs. inherent/lexical case proposed within Government-Binding (Chomsky 1981) remains a very popular one, despite evidence to the contrary that the inner workings of case systems are far more complex than this simple division would suggest and that individual case markers generally make a systematic structural and semantic contribution that interacts in a generalizable manner with the lexical semantics of a predicate</dcterms:abstract> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/41211"/> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/45"/> <dcterms:issued>2006</dcterms:issued> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/45"/> <dcterms:title>The dative-ergative connection</dcterms:title> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>

Das Dokument erscheint in:

KOPS Suche


Stöbern

Mein Benutzerkonto