KOPS - The Institutional Repository of the University of Konstanz

Implementing ECtHR Judgments in So-Called "Multipolar Fundamental Rights Situations"

Aufgrund von Vorbereitungen auf eine neue Version von KOPS, können kommenden Montag und Dienstag keine Publikationen eingereicht werden. (Due to preparations for a new version of KOPS, no publications can be submitted next Monday and Tuesday.)

Implementing ECtHR Judgments in So-Called "Multipolar Fundamental Rights Situations"

Cite This

Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

BREUER, Marten, 2017. Implementing ECtHR Judgments in So-Called "Multipolar Fundamental Rights Situations". In: Journal of Siberian Federal University : Humanities & Social Sciences. 10(6), pp. 851-858. ISSN 1997-1370. eISSN 2313-6014

@article{Breuer2017Imple-39937, title={Implementing ECtHR Judgments in So-Called "Multipolar Fundamental Rights Situations"}, url={http://elib.sfu-kras.ru/handle/2311/33309}, year={2017}, number={6}, volume={10}, issn={1997-1370}, journal={Journal of Siberian Federal University : Humanities & Social Sciences}, pages={851--858}, author={Breuer, Marten} }

<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/39937"> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">The implementation of ECtHR judgments may be particularly difficult in cases where the concerns of two or more private litigants must be weighed against each other. The Strasbourg proceedings are unilateral in that only one of them (the party having lost the case at the national level) will be directly represented. If the ECtHR finds in favour of this party, implementing the judgment might raise fundamental rights concerns of the party previously having won the case before German courts. The article analyses the approach taken by the German Federal Constitutional Court, in particular in its famous Görgülü decision. It also evaluates the relevance of the “multipolar fundamental rights” argument in the jurisprudence of German courts.</dcterms:abstract> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/44"/> <dc:contributor>Breuer, Marten</dc:contributor> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2017-08-23T10:58:42Z</dc:date> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/44"/> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/jspui"/> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/39937"/> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2017-08-23T10:58:42Z</dcterms:available> <dcterms:title>Implementing ECtHR Judgments in So-Called "Multipolar Fundamental Rights Situations"</dcterms:title> <dcterms:issued>2017</dcterms:issued> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dc:creator>Breuer, Marten</dc:creator> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Search KOPS


Browse

My Account