KOPS - Das Institutionelle Repositorium der Universität Konstanz

Modeling as a case for the empirical philosophy of science : the benefits and challenges of qualitative methods

Modeling as a case for the empirical philosophy of science : the benefits and challenges of qualitative methods

Zitieren

Dateien zu dieser Ressource

Dateien Größe Format Anzeige

Zu diesem Dokument gibt es keine Dateien.

SVETLOVA, Ekaterina, 2015. Modeling as a case for the empirical philosophy of science : the benefits and challenges of qualitative methods. In: WAGENKNECHT, Susann, ed., Nancy J. NERSESSIAN, ed., Hanne ANDERSEN, ed.. Empirical Philosophy of Science : Introducing Qualitative Methods into Philosophy of Science. Cham:Springer, pp. 65-82. ISBN 978-3-319-18600-9

@incollection{Svetlova2015Model-35772, title={Modeling as a case for the empirical philosophy of science : the benefits and challenges of qualitative methods}, year={2015}, doi={10.1007/978-3-319-18600-9_4}, number={21}, isbn={978-3-319-18600-9}, address={Cham}, publisher={Springer}, series={Studies in applied philosophy, epistemology and rational ethics}, booktitle={Empirical Philosophy of Science : Introducing Qualitative Methods into Philosophy of Science}, pages={65--82}, editor={Wagenknecht, Susann and Nersessian, Nancy J. and Andersen, Hanne}, author={Svetlova, Ekaterina} }

<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/35772"> <dcterms:issued>2015</dcterms:issued> <dcterms:title>Modeling as a case for the empirical philosophy of science : the benefits and challenges of qualitative methods</dcterms:title> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">In recent years, the emergence of a new trend in contemporary philosophy has been observed in the increasing usage of empirical research methods to conduct philosophical inquiries. Although philosophers primarily use secondary data from other disciplines or apply quantitative methods (experiments, surveys, etc.), the rise of qualitative methods (e.g., in-depth interviews, participant observations and qualitative text analysis) can also be observed. In this paper, I focus on how qualitative research methods can be applied within philosophy of science, namely within the philosophical debate on modeling. Specifically, I review my empirical investigations into the issues of model de-idealization, model justification and performativity.</dcterms:abstract> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/35772"/> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2016-10-27T15:56:19Z</dcterms:available> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2016-10-27T15:56:19Z</dc:date> <dc:creator>Svetlova, Ekaterina</dc:creator> <dc:contributor>Svetlova, Ekaterina</dc:contributor> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>

Das Dokument erscheint in:

KOPS Suche


Stöbern

Mein Benutzerkonto