Monstrous A Priori


Dateien zu dieser Ressource

Dateien Größe Format Anzeige

Zu diesem Dokument gibt es keine Dateien.

KUPFFER, Manfred, 2004. Monstrous A Priori. GAP.5 : Philosophie und/als Wissenschaft ; fünfter Internationaler Kongress der Gesellschaft für Analytische Philosophie. Bielefeld, 22. Sep 2003 - 26. Sep 2003. In: BLUHM, Roland, ed., Christian NIMTZ, ed.. Ausgewählte Beiträge zu den Sektionen der GAP.5 : fünfter Internationaler Kongress der Gesellschaft für Analytische Philosophie. Paderborn:Mentis, pp. 309-319. ISBN 3-89785-242-X

@inproceedings{Kupffer2004Monst-34118, title={Monstrous A Priori}, url={}, year={2004}, isbn={3-89785-242-X}, address={Paderborn}, publisher={Mentis}, booktitle={Ausgewählte Beiträge zu den Sektionen der GAP.5 : fünfter Internationaler Kongress der Gesellschaft für Analytische Philosophie}, pages={309--319}, editor={Bluhm, Roland and Nimtz, Christian}, author={Kupffer, Manfred} }

<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="" xmlns:dc="" xmlns:rdf="" xmlns:bibo="" xmlns:dspace="" xmlns:foaf="" xmlns:void="" xmlns:xsd="" > <rdf:Description rdf:about=""> <bibo:uri rdf:resource=""/> <dcterms:title>Monstrous A Priori</dcterms:title> <dcterms:issued>2004</dcterms:issued> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="">2016-05-27T08:36:30Z</dcterms:available> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">This paper is devoted to the search for an argument for the existence of a posteriori identities. I will try to improve on existing predecessors and defend the result against Scott Soames' critique in his recent book "Beyond Rigidity". First I will inspect Kripke's original argument as well as Soames' reconstruction. This reconstruction, while closely related, is shown to differ from Kripke's original in important respects. I will then ask whether either the original or Soames reconstruction may be considered as satisfactory arguments for the existence of aposteriori identities. I will show that this is not the case. These arguments use objectionable notions of apriority, but this problem can be remedied. The result will still be open to Soames main criticism against Kripkean arguments, namely that they are committed to principles of disquotation, principles of a kind that Kripke himself has later shown to be objectionable. Therefore, I will also sketch a defense of principles of disquotation.</dcterms:abstract> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource=""/> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource=""/> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/jspui"/> <dc:creator>Kupffer, Manfred</dc:creator> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource=""/> <dc:date rdf:datatype="">2016-05-27T08:36:30Z</dc:date> <dc:contributor>Kupffer, Manfred</dc:contributor> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource=""/> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>

Das Dokument erscheint in:

KOPS Suche


Mein Benutzerkonto