Guidelines for Effective Usage of Text Highlighting Techniques


Dateien zu dieser Ressource

Dateien Größe Format Anzeige

Zu diesem Dokument gibt es keine Dateien.

STROBELT, Hendrik, Daniela OELKE, Bum Chul KWON, Tobias SCHRECK, Hanspeter PFISTER, 2016. Guidelines for Effective Usage of Text Highlighting Techniques. In: IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics. 22(1), pp. 489-498. ISSN 1077-2626. eISSN 1941-0506

@article{Strobelt2016Guide-32657, title={Guidelines for Effective Usage of Text Highlighting Techniques}, year={2016}, doi={10.1109/TVCG.2015.2467759}, number={1}, volume={22}, issn={1077-2626}, journal={IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics}, pages={489--498}, author={Strobelt, Hendrik and Oelke, Daniela and Kwon, Bum Chul and Schreck, Tobias and Pfister, Hanspeter} }

<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="" xmlns:bibo="" xmlns:dc="" xmlns:dcterms="" xmlns:xsd="" > <rdf:Description rdf:about=""> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="">2016-01-20T14:22:39Z</dcterms:available> <dcterms:title>Guidelines for Effective Usage of Text Highlighting Techniques</dcterms:title> <dc:creator>Strobelt, Hendrik</dc:creator> <dc:contributor>Schreck, Tobias</dc:contributor> <dc:contributor>Pfister, Hanspeter</dc:contributor> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Semi-automatic text analysis involves manual inspection of text. Often, different text annotations (like part-of-speech or named entities) are indicated by using distinctive text highlighting techniques. In typesetting there exist well-known formatting conventions, such as bold typeface, italics, or background coloring, that are useful for highlighting certain parts of a given text. Also, many advanced techniques for visualization and highlighting of text exist; yet, standard typesetting is common, and the effects of standard typesetting on the perception of text are not fully understood. As such, we surveyed and tested the effectiveness of common text highlighting techniques, both individually and in combination, to discover how to maximize pop-out effects while minimizing visual interference between techniques. To validate our findings, we conducted a series of crowdsourced experiments to determine: i) a ranking of nine commonly-used text highlighting techniques; ii) the degree of visual interference between pairs of text highlighting techniques; iii) the effectiveness of techniques for visual conjunctive search. Our results show that increasing font size works best as a single highlighting technique, and that there are significant visual interferences between some pairs of highlighting techniques. We discuss the pros and cons of different combinations as a design guideline to choose text highlighting techniques for text viewers.</dcterms:abstract> <bibo:uri rdf:resource=""/> <dc:contributor>Oelke, Daniela</dc:contributor> <dc:contributor>Strobelt, Hendrik</dc:contributor> <dc:creator>Pfister, Hanspeter</dc:creator> <dc:creator>Kwon, Bum Chul</dc:creator> <dc:creator>Oelke, Daniela</dc:creator> <dcterms:issued>2016</dcterms:issued> <dc:creator>Schreck, Tobias</dc:creator> <dc:contributor>Kwon, Bum Chul</dc:contributor> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dc:date rdf:datatype="">2016-01-20T14:22:39Z</dc:date> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>

Das Dokument erscheint in:

KOPS Suche


Mein Benutzerkonto