Decision processes in human performance monitoring

Zitieren

Dateien zu dieser Ressource

Prüfsumme: MD5:c3f6a346d6da9aea343cee236fb941e1

STEINHAUSER, Marco, Nick YEUNG, 2010. Decision processes in human performance monitoring. In: Journal of Neuroscience. 30(46), pp. 15643-15653. ISSN 0270-6474. eISSN 1529-2401

@article{Steinhauser2010-11-17Decis-14608, title={Decision processes in human performance monitoring}, year={2010}, doi={10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1899-10.2010}, number={46}, volume={30}, issn={0270-6474}, journal={Journal of Neuroscience}, pages={15643--15653}, author={Steinhauser, Marco and Yeung, Nick} }

<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/14608"> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-11-10T09:09:28Z</dcterms:available> <dc:creator>Yeung, Nick</dc:creator> <dc:rights>deposit-license</dc:rights> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">The ability to detect and compensate for errors is crucial in producing effective, goal-directed behavior. Human error processing is reflected in two event-related brain potential components, the error-related negativity (Ne/ERN) and error positivity (Pe), but the functional significance of both components remains unclear. Our approach was to consider error detection as a decision process involving an evaluation of available evidence that an error has occurred against an internal criterion. This framework distinguishes two fundamental stages of error detection—accumulating evidence (input), and reaching a decision (output)—that should be differentially affected by changes in internal criterion. Predictions from this model were tested in a brightness discrimination task that required human participants to signal their errors, with incentives varied to encourage participants to adopt a high or low criterion for signaling their errors. Whereas the Ne/ERN was unaffected by this manipulation, the Pe varied consistently with criterion: A higher criterion was associated with larger Pe amplitude for signaled errors, suggesting that the Pe reflects the strength of accumulated evidence. Across participants, Pe amplitude was predictive of changes in behavioral criterion as estimated through signal detection theory analysis. Within participants, Pe amplitude could be estimated robustly with multivariate machine learning techniques and used to predict error signaling behavior both at the level of error signaling frequencies and at the level of individual signaling responses. These results suggest that the Pe, rather than the Ne/ERN, is closely related to error detection, and specifically reflects the accumulated evidence that an error has been committed.</dcterms:abstract> <dc:contributor>Yeung, Nick</dc:contributor> <dcterms:bibliographicCitation>First publ. in: The Journal of Neuroscience ; 30 (2010), 46. - S. 15643-15653</dcterms:bibliographicCitation> <dcterms:title>Decision processes in human performance monitoring</dcterms:title> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="http://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:bsz:352-20140905103605204-4002607-1"/> <dc:creator>Steinhauser, Marco</dc:creator> <dc:contributor>Steinhauser, Marco</dc:contributor> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dcterms:issued>2010-11-17</dcterms:issued> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-11-10T09:09:28Z</dc:date> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/14608"/> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>

Dateiabrufe seit 01.10.2014 (Informationen über die Zugriffsstatistik)

Steinhauser_Yeung.pdf 54

Das Dokument erscheint in:

KOPS Suche


Stöbern

Mein Benutzerkonto