Publikation: Separation versus Fusion - or : How to Accommodate National Autonomy and the Charter? ; Diverging Visions of the German Constitutional Court and the European Court of Justice
Lade...
Dateien
Datum
2013
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
URI (zitierfähiger Link)
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Link zur Lizenz
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Open Access Green
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published
Erschienen in
European Constitutional Law Review. 2013, 9(03), pp. 391-419. ISSN 1574-0196. eISSN 1744-5515. Available under: doi: 10.1017/S1574019612001228
Zusammenfassung
German Federal Constitutional Court's dialogue with the European Court of Justice – Background, trigger, contents and context of the FCC's reaction to the Åkerberg Fransson judgment – The FCC's Counter-Terrorism Database judgment – Constitutional control standards – theoretical repercussions of the judicial dispute – Underlying conceptual differences – The ‘fusion thesis’ versus the ‘separation thesis’ – Pragmatic approximation of divergent positions
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
340 Recht
Schlagwörter
Charter EU
Konferenz
Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined
Zitieren
ISO 690
THYM, Daniel, 2013. Separation versus Fusion - or : How to Accommodate National Autonomy and the Charter? ; Diverging Visions of the German Constitutional Court and the European Court of Justice. In: European Constitutional Law Review. 2013, 9(03), pp. 391-419. ISSN 1574-0196. eISSN 1744-5515. Available under: doi: 10.1017/S1574019612001228BibTex
@article{Thym2013Separ-27199,
year={2013},
doi={10.1017/S1574019612001228},
title={Separation versus Fusion - or : How to Accommodate National Autonomy and the Charter? ; Diverging Visions of the German Constitutional Court and the European Court of Justice},
number={03},
volume={9},
issn={1574-0196},
journal={European Constitutional Law Review},
pages={391--419},
author={Thym, Daniel}
}RDF
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" >
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/27199">
<dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/44"/>
<dcterms:issued>2013</dcterms:issued>
<foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
<dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/44"/>
<dc:contributor>Thym, Daniel</dc:contributor>
<dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2014-03-25T08:38:20Z</dcterms:available>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/30"/>
<void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
<dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2014-03-25T08:38:20Z</dc:date>
<dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
<dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/27199/2/Thym_271995.pdf"/>
<dcterms:title>Separation versus Fusion - or : How to Accommodate National Autonomy and the Charter? ; Diverging Visions of the German Constitutional Court and the European Court of Justice</dcterms:title>
<bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/27199"/>
<dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
<dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/30"/>
<dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/27199/2/Thym_271995.pdf"/>
<dc:creator>Thym, Daniel</dc:creator>
<dcterms:bibliographicCitation>European Constitutional Law Review ; 9 (2013), 3. - S. 391-419</dcterms:bibliographicCitation>
<dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">German Federal Constitutional Court's dialogue with the European Court of Justice – Background, trigger, contents and context of the FCC's reaction to the Åkerberg Fransson judgment – The FCC's Counter-Terrorism Database judgment – Constitutional control standards – theoretical repercussions of the judicial dispute – Underlying conceptual differences – The ‘fusion thesis’ versus the ‘separation thesis’ – Pragmatic approximation of divergent positions</dcterms:abstract>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>Interner Vermerk
xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter
Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation
Finanzierungsart
Kommentar zur Publikation
Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Ja
