Publikation:

Indirect Reciprocity and Strategic Reputation Building in an Experimental Helping Game

Lade...
Vorschaubild

Dateien

Engelmann_2-5542tt2vtb936.pdf
Engelmann_2-5542tt2vtb936.pdfGröße: 447.63 KBDownloads: ?

Datum

2009

Autor:innen

Engelmann, Dirk

Herausgeber:innen

Kontakt

ISSN der Zeitschrift

Electronic ISSN

ISBN

Bibliografische Daten

Verlag

Schriftenreihe

Auflagebezeichnung

ArXiv-ID

Internationale Patentnummer

Angaben zur Forschungsförderung

Projekt

Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Open Access Green
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz

Gesperrt bis

Titel in einer weiteren Sprache

Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published

Erschienen in

Games and Economic Behavior. Elsevier. 2009, 67(2), pp. 399-407. ISSN 0899-8256. eISSN 1090-2473. Available under: doi: 10.1016/j.geb.2008.12.006

Zusammenfassung

We study indirect reciprocity and strategic reputation building in an experimental helping game. At any time only half of the subjects can build a reputation. This allows us to study both pure indirect reciprocity that is not contaminated by strategic reputation building and the impact of incentives for strategic reputation building on the helping rate. We find that pure indirect reciprocity exists, but also that the helping decisions are substantially affected by strategic considerations. Finally, we find that strategic do better than non-strategic players and non-reciprocal do better than reciprocal players, casting doubt on previously proposed evolutionary explanations for indirect reciprocity.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache

Fachgebiet (DDC)
004 Informatik

Schlagwörter

Indirect reciprocity, Reputation, Experimental economics

Konferenz

Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined

Forschungsvorhaben

Organisationseinheiten

Zeitschriftenheft

Zugehörige Datensätze in KOPS

Zitieren

ISO 690ENGELMANN, Dirk, Urs FISCHBACHER, 2009. Indirect Reciprocity and Strategic Reputation Building in an Experimental Helping Game. In: Games and Economic Behavior. Elsevier. 2009, 67(2), pp. 399-407. ISSN 0899-8256. eISSN 1090-2473. Available under: doi: 10.1016/j.geb.2008.12.006
BibTex
@article{Engelmann2009Indir-11986.2,
  year={2009},
  doi={10.1016/j.geb.2008.12.006},
  title={Indirect Reciprocity and Strategic Reputation Building in an Experimental Helping Game},
  number={2},
  volume={67},
  issn={0899-8256},
  journal={Games and Economic Behavior},
  pages={399--407},
  author={Engelmann, Dirk and Fischbacher, Urs}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/11986.2">
    <dc:contributor>Fischbacher, Urs</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/46"/>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dc:creator>Engelmann, Dirk</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2022-07-26T09:37:29Z</dc:date>
    <dc:creator>Fischbacher, Urs</dc:creator>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">We study indirect reciprocity and strategic reputation building in an experimental helping game. At any time only half of the subjects can build a reputation. This allows us to study both pure indirect reciprocity that is not contaminated by strategic reputation building and the impact of incentives for strategic reputation building on the helping rate. We find that pure indirect reciprocity exists, but also that the helping decisions are substantially affected by strategic considerations. Finally, we find that strategic do better than non-strategic players and non-reciprocal do better than reciprocal players, casting doubt on previously proposed evolutionary explanations for indirect reciprocity.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/11986.2/1/Engelmann_2-5542tt2vtb936.pdf"/>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/11986.2"/>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/46"/>
    <dcterms:issued>2009</dcterms:issued>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/11986.2/1/Engelmann_2-5542tt2vtb936.pdf"/>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2022-07-26T09:37:29Z</dcterms:available>
    <dc:contributor>Engelmann, Dirk</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
    <dcterms:title>Indirect Reciprocity and Strategic Reputation Building in an Experimental Helping Game</dcterms:title>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Interner Vermerk

xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter

Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.

Prüfdatum der URL

Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation

Finanzierungsart

Kommentar zur Publikation

Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Ja
Begutachtet
Ja
Diese Publikation teilen

Versionsgeschichte

Gerade angezeigt 1 - 2 von 2
VersionDatumZusammenfassung
2*
2022-07-26 09:31:16
2011-03-25 09:41:34
* Ausgewählte Version