Publikation: Pro-drop in interrogatives across older Germanic and Romance languages
Dateien
Datum
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
URI (zitierfähiger Link)
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Link zur Lizenz
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Publikationsstatus
Erschienen in
Zusammenfassung
This chapter investigates the mechanisms of null subject licensing in direct interrogatives, an environment which is generally neglected in investigation into null subjects, using data from a range of early Romance and Germanic languages considered to be asymmetric pro-drop languages, i.e. languages in which null subjects are favoured in main clauses. We find that there is subtle variation between the languages in question, but that two factors in particular – interrogative type and person – are crucial in conditioning this variation, and we sketch analyses based on the differential availability of Agree relations with left-peripheral elements. Therefore, null subjects in main interrogative clauses are licensed in two slightly different manners in the two language families – a fact which we show follows from differences in the structure of their left periphery and in agreement morphology.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
Zitieren
ISO 690
COGNOLA, Federica, George WALKDEN, 2021. Pro-drop in interrogatives across older Germanic and Romance languages. In: WOLFE, Sam, Hrsg., Christine MEKLENBORG, Hrsg.. Continuity and Variation in Germanic and Romance. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021, S. 97-136. ISBN 978-0-19-884116-6. Verfügbar unter: doi: 10.1093/oso/9780198841166.003.0005BibTex
@incollection{Cognola2021Prodr-58698, year={2021}, doi={10.1093/oso/9780198841166.003.0005}, title={Pro-drop in interrogatives across older Germanic and Romance languages}, isbn={978-0-19-884116-6}, publisher={Oxford University Press}, address={Oxford}, booktitle={Continuity and Variation in Germanic and Romance}, pages={97--136}, editor={Wolfe, Sam and Meklenborg, Christine}, author={Cognola, Federica and Walkden, George} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/58698"> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/> <dc:creator>Walkden, George</dc:creator> <dc:contributor>Cognola, Federica</dc:contributor> <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/58698/1/Cognola_2-5ji2f78tqvws2.pdf"/> <dc:contributor>Walkden, George</dc:contributor> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/45"/> <dc:creator>Cognola, Federica</dc:creator> <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights> <dcterms:title>Pro-drop in interrogatives across older Germanic and Romance languages</dcterms:title> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <dcterms:issued>2021</dcterms:issued> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2022-09-28T12:55:32Z</dc:date> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">This chapter investigates the mechanisms of null subject licensing in direct interrogatives, an environment which is generally neglected in investigation into null subjects, using data from a range of early Romance and Germanic languages considered to be asymmetric pro-drop languages, i.e. languages in which null subjects are favoured in main clauses. We find that there is subtle variation between the languages in question, but that two factors in particular – interrogative type and person – are crucial in conditioning this variation, and we sketch analyses based on the differential availability of Agree relations with left-peripheral elements. Therefore, null subjects in main interrogative clauses are licensed in two slightly different manners in the two language families – a fact which we show follows from differences in the structure of their left periphery and in agreement morphology.</dcterms:abstract> <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/58698/1/Cognola_2-5ji2f78tqvws2.pdf"/> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/58698"/> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2022-09-28T12:55:32Z</dcterms:available> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/45"/> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>