On Having the Last Word : Epistemological and Normative Considerations

dc.contributor.authorWolters, Gereon
dc.date.accessioned2016-03-10T12:39:16Z
dc.date.available2016-03-10T12:39:16Z
dc.date.issued2015eng
dc.description.abstractClaims by extra-scientific, religious institutions or fundamentalist believers to having the last word in matters scientific (humanities included) have been connected in the history of science less with defending truth than rather with exerting power and authority. The condemnation of Galileo is the model case. Other examples are the Papal infallibility dogma of 1871, the case of evolutionary theory in present day Vatican statements, and, finally, in present-day fundamentalist Christian and Islamic circles. My normative plea is based on a great achievement of enlightened rational thinking: there are no last words, neither in science nor in other cognitive fields. Enlightened rejection of the last word does not, however, support "postmodern" Western relativism: there are very well second last words, based on universalizable arguments and evidence.eng
dc.description.versionpublishedeng
dc.identifier.urihttps://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/33290
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.subjectEvolutionary theory, Galileo, Papal Infallibility, Islamic fundamentalism, Christian fundamentalism, Catholic Church and Evolutioneng
dc.subject.ddc150eng
dc.titleOn Having the Last Word : Epistemological and Normative Considerationseng
dc.typeJOURNAL_ARTICLEeng
dspace.entity.typePublication
kops.citation.bibtex
@article{Wolters2015Havin-33290,
  year={2015},
  title={On Having the Last Word : Epistemological and Normative Considerations},
  volume={216},
  issn={1129-5643},
  journal={Bollettino della Società Filosofica Italiana},
  pages={69--87},
  author={Wolters, Gereon}
}
kops.citation.iso690WOLTERS, Gereon, 2015. On Having the Last Word : Epistemological and Normative Considerations. In: Bollettino della Società Filosofica Italiana. 2015, 216, pp. 69-87. ISSN 1129-5643deu
kops.citation.iso690WOLTERS, Gereon, 2015. On Having the Last Word : Epistemological and Normative Considerations. In: Bollettino della Società Filosofica Italiana. 2015, 216, pp. 69-87. ISSN 1129-5643eng
kops.citation.rdf
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/33290">
    <dcterms:title>On Having the Last Word : Epistemological and Normative Considerations</dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:issued>2015</dcterms:issued>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2016-03-10T12:39:16Z</dc:date>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/33290"/>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dc:creator>Wolters, Gereon</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Wolters, Gereon</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2016-03-10T12:39:16Z</dcterms:available>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Claims by extra-scientific, religious institutions or fundamentalist believers to having the last word in matters scientific (humanities included) have been connected in the history of science less with defending truth than rather with exerting power and authority. The condemnation of Galileo is the model case. Other examples are the Papal infallibility dogma of 1871, the case of evolutionary theory in present day Vatican statements, and, finally, in present-day fundamentalist Christian and Islamic circles. My normative plea is based on a great achievement of enlightened rational thinking: there are no last words, neither in science nor in other cognitive fields. Enlightened rejection of the last word does not, however, support "postmodern" Western relativism: there are very well second last words, based on universalizable arguments and evidence.</dcterms:abstract>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
kops.flag.knbibliographytrue
kops.sourcefieldBollettino della Società Filosofica Italiana. 2015, <b>216</b>, pp. 69-87. ISSN 1129-5643deu
kops.sourcefield.plainBollettino della Società Filosofica Italiana. 2015, 216, pp. 69-87. ISSN 1129-5643deu
kops.sourcefield.plainBollettino della Società Filosofica Italiana. 2015, 216, pp. 69-87. ISSN 1129-5643eng
relation.isAuthorOfPublicatione8f51cba-29e7-4dbf-a8d0-df4507be8c3e
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoverye8f51cba-29e7-4dbf-a8d0-df4507be8c3e
source.bibliographicInfo.fromPage69eng
source.bibliographicInfo.toPage87eng
source.bibliographicInfo.volume216eng
source.identifier.issn1129-5643eng
source.periodicalTitleBollettino della Società Filosofica Italianaeng

Dateien

Lizenzbündel

Gerade angezeigt 1 - 1 von 1
Vorschaubild nicht verfügbar
Name:
license.txt
Größe:
3.88 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Beschreibung:
license.txt
license.txtGröße: 3.88 KBDownloads: 0