Community composition of bacterial biofilms on two submerged macrophytes and an artificial substrate in a pre-alpine lake

dc.contributor.authorHempel, Melaniedeu
dc.contributor.authorGrossart, Hans-Peterdeu
dc.contributor.authorGross, Elisabeth
dc.date.accessioned2011-03-24T17:46:44Zdeu
dc.date.available2011-03-24T17:46:44Zdeu
dc.date.issued2009deu
dc.description.abstractWe compared the heterotrophic community composition of bacterial biofilms on the submerged macrophytes Myriophyllum spicatum and Potamogeton perfoliatus and on an artificial surface in Lower Lake Constance (Germany) on spatial (plant age) and temporal scales using denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). M. spicatum contains polyphenolic allelochemicals that inhibit algae, cyanobacteria, and heterotrophic bacteria, and possibly influence the community composition, whereas P. perfoliatus does not. In 2005, the community composition of bacterial biofilms on apices and leaves of M. spicatum differed significantly. In 2006, the biofilm communities on the apices or leaves of M. spicatum and P. perfoliatus and the artificial surface did not differ significantly, although all except one apex sample of M. spicatum formed a distinct cluster based on DGGE banding patterns. On all surfaces, members of the Cytophaga-Flavobacter-Bacteroidetes (CFB) group (16 to 22%), Alphaproteobacteria (19%), and Betaproteobacteria (7 to 31%) were abundant; Actinobacteria and Planctomycetes occurred less frequently. Sequences of DNA fragments excised from DGGE gels were mainly affiliated with yet uncultured clones originating from various freshwater habitats. Several sequences were from bacteria capable of degrading phenolic and aromatic compounds. The chemical composition of the 2 plant species and of the different parts of M. spicatum differed up to an order of magnitude. Differences in the biofilm community composition mainly depended on environmental factors (water level, conductivity, temperature, pH) and the plant chemical composition, especially the carbon and total phenolic content.
Our results suggest that the biofilm community on M. spicatum apices is related to specific bacterial functions in this microenvironment.
eng
dc.description.versionpublished
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfdeu
dc.identifier.citationFirst publ. in: Aquatic Microbial Ecology 58 (2010), 1, pp. 79 94deu
dc.identifier.doi10.3354/ame01353
dc.identifier.ppn318130726deu
dc.identifier.urihttp://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/8824
dc.language.isoengdeu
dc.legacy.dateIssued2010deu
dc.rightsterms-of-usedeu
dc.rights.urihttps://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/deu
dc.subjectAufwuchsdeu
dc.subjectBiofilmdeu
dc.subjectBakteriendeu
dc.subjectWasserpflanzendeu
dc.subjectMyriophyllum spicatumdeu
dc.subjectPotamogeton perfoliatusdeu
dc.subjectDGGEdeu
dc.subjectFISHdeu
dc.subjectPhenolic compoundsdeu
dc.subjectBiofilmsdeu
dc.subjectMacrophytesdeu
dc.subject.ddc570deu
dc.titleCommunity composition of bacterial biofilms on two submerged macrophytes and an artificial substrate in a pre-alpine lakeeng
dc.typeJOURNAL_ARTICLEdeu
dspace.entity.typePublication
kops.citation.bibtex
@article{Hempel2009Commu-8824,
  year={2009},
  doi={10.3354/ame01353},
  title={Community composition of bacterial biofilms on two submerged macrophytes and an artificial substrate in a pre-alpine lake},
  number={1},
  volume={58},
  journal={Aquatic Microbial Ecology},
  pages={79--94},
  author={Hempel, Melanie and Grossart, Hans-Peter and Gross, Elisabeth}
}
kops.citation.iso690HEMPEL, Melanie, Hans-Peter GROSSART, Elisabeth GROSS, 2009. Community composition of bacterial biofilms on two submerged macrophytes and an artificial substrate in a pre-alpine lake. In: Aquatic Microbial Ecology. 2009, 58(1), pp. 79-94. Available under: doi: 10.3354/ame01353deu
kops.citation.iso690HEMPEL, Melanie, Hans-Peter GROSSART, Elisabeth GROSS, 2009. Community composition of bacterial biofilms on two submerged macrophytes and an artificial substrate in a pre-alpine lake. In: Aquatic Microbial Ecology. 2009, 58(1), pp. 79-94. Available under: doi: 10.3354/ame01353eng
kops.citation.rdf
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/8824">
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-03-24T17:46:44Z</dc:date>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/28"/>
    <dcterms:title>Community composition of bacterial biofilms on two submerged macrophytes and an artificial substrate in a pre-alpine lake</dcterms:title>
    <dc:creator>Gross, Elisabeth</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">We compared the heterotrophic community composition of bacterial biofilms on the submerged macrophytes Myriophyllum spicatum and Potamogeton perfoliatus and on an artificial surface in Lower Lake Constance (Germany) on spatial (plant age) and temporal scales using denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). M. spicatum contains polyphenolic allelochemicals that inhibit algae, cyanobacteria, and heterotrophic bacteria, and possibly influence the community composition, whereas P. perfoliatus does not. In 2005, the community composition of bacterial biofilms on apices and leaves of M. spicatum differed significantly. In 2006, the biofilm communities on the apices or leaves of M. spicatum and P. perfoliatus and the artificial surface did not differ significantly, although all except one apex sample of M. spicatum formed a distinct cluster based on DGGE banding patterns. On all surfaces, members of the Cytophaga-Flavobacter-Bacteroidetes (CFB) group (16 to 22%), Alphaproteobacteria (19%), and Betaproteobacteria (7 to 31%) were abundant; Actinobacteria and Planctomycetes occurred less frequently. Sequences of DNA fragments excised from DGGE gels were mainly affiliated with yet uncultured clones originating from various freshwater habitats. Several sequences were from bacteria capable of degrading phenolic and aromatic compounds. The chemical composition of the 2 plant species and of the different parts of M. spicatum differed up to an order of magnitude. Differences in the biofilm community composition mainly depended on environmental factors (water level, conductivity, temperature, pH) and the plant chemical composition, especially the carbon and total phenolic content.&lt;br /&gt;Our results suggest that the biofilm community on M. spicatum apices is related to specific bacterial functions in this microenvironment.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dc:creator>Grossart, Hans-Peter</dc:creator>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/8824/1/Hempel_etal_2009_Bacterial_biofilm_macrophytes.pdf"/>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/8824"/>
    <dc:contributor>Grossart, Hans-Peter</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Gross, Elisabeth</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Hempel, Melanie</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Hempel, Melanie</dc:contributor>
    <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dcterms:issued>2009</dcterms:issued>
    <dcterms:bibliographicCitation>First publ. in: Aquatic Microbial Ecology 58 (2010), 1, pp. 79 94</dcterms:bibliographicCitation>
    <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/28"/>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/8824/1/Hempel_etal_2009_Bacterial_biofilm_macrophytes.pdf"/>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-03-24T17:46:44Z</dcterms:available>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
kops.description.openAccessopenaccessgreen
kops.flag.knbibliographytrue
kops.identifier.nbnurn:nbn:de:bsz:352-opus-105028deu
kops.opus.id10502deu
kops.sourcefieldAquatic Microbial Ecology. 2009, <b>58</b>(1), pp. 79-94. Available under: doi: 10.3354/ame01353deu
kops.sourcefield.plainAquatic Microbial Ecology. 2009, 58(1), pp. 79-94. Available under: doi: 10.3354/ame01353deu
kops.sourcefield.plainAquatic Microbial Ecology. 2009, 58(1), pp. 79-94. Available under: doi: 10.3354/ame01353eng
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationcf35060f-a3da-4e6e-8333-c86a337736a0
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoverycf35060f-a3da-4e6e-8333-c86a337736a0
source.bibliographicInfo.fromPage79
source.bibliographicInfo.issue1
source.bibliographicInfo.toPage94
source.bibliographicInfo.volume58
source.periodicalTitleAquatic Microbial Ecology

Dateien

Originalbündel

Gerade angezeigt 1 - 1 von 1
Vorschaubild nicht verfügbar
Name:
Hempel_etal_2009_Bacterial_biofilm_macrophytes.pdf
Größe:
336.37 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Hempel_etal_2009_Bacterial_biofilm_macrophytes.pdf
Hempel_etal_2009_Bacterial_biofilm_macrophytes.pdfGröße: 336.37 KBDownloads: 529